Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

"illaga":3u7yjuxn" said:
The file is attached, Mr. Levent. I also had one more question. In systems with floor level, should we give our columns an upper level or tie them to the column on the upper floor? In the project, it is seen that the S35 column can be entered in the ground and mezzanine, but not in the basement.
 
"Levent Özpak":3hi5o11w" said:
"illaga":3hi5o11w" said:
The file is attached Mr. Levent. Also, I had one more question. In systems with floor level, should we give our columns an upper level or connect them to the column on the upper floor?
*In addition to what Nedim Bey said, in the project, it is seen that the S35 column can be entered in the ground and mezzanine, but not in the basement on the floor. *In case the floor is given a positive level, it would be appropriate to give an upper level to the columns and beams attached to the floor. Vertical continuity should be provided by raising the relevant columns on an upper floor. Good work
Thank you, Mr. Levent. The S35 column on the ground floor provides vertical continuity with the curtain in the basement. I think this will not cause a problem. How do you think?
 
"illaga":3b1xxahw" said:
"Levent Özpak":3b1xxahw" said:
"illaga":3b1xxahw" said:
The file is attached Mr. Levent. I also have one more question. In systems with slab elevations, to give our columns an upper level or is it connected to the column on the upper floor?
*In addition to what Nedim Bey said, it is seen in the project that the S35 column is entered in the ground and mezzanine, but not in the basement on the floor *In case of positive leveling of the floor, giving an upper level to the columns and beams connected to the floor It would be appropriate. Vertical continuity should be provided by raising the relevant columns on an upper floor. Good work
Thank you, Mr. Levent. The S35 column on the ground floor provides vertical continuity with the curtain in the basement. I think this will not cause a problem. How do you think?
Top Column object entered on the ground floor is not connected to the panel object on the lower floor.The column must also be entered on the basement floor.Deformation of the column and structure can be examined in the perspective window/3D frame mode.
 
So is there a mistake I've been taught? As I know, the column on the lower floor cannot continue as a curtain on the upper floor, but I know that the curtain on the lower floor can be designed as a column on the upper floor, my master.
 
"illaga":3tq58jjb" said:
So is there a mistake I've been taught? The column on the lower floor I know cannot continue as a curtain on the upper floor, but I know that the curtain on the lower floor can be designed as a column on the upper floor, master.
The column on the lower floor It cannot continue as a curtain on the upper floor, but the curtain on the lower floor can be designed as a column on the upper floor. ideCAD allows data entry as you typed it. In terms of program data entry rules, you must enter the column size of the column in the upper floor and the width of the curtain in the curtain. This will provide you with shower reinforcement continuity.
 
have a nice day. I am a 1 year civil engineer. and after graduating i started drawing the project directly using ide 7. visuality, ease of use, report section are all very useful. but when I analyze a project more than once, I can't get the first report. The project that does not give an error in the first analysis gives an error in the third analysis. I wonder why this is caused. I don't know how to prevent this. I am waiting for your help in this matter.. have a nice day, good work.
 
"msami":1z5vykcs" said:
good day. I'm a civil engineer for 1 year. After graduation, I started drawing projects directly using ide 7. Its visuality, ease of use, report part are all very useful. But when I analyze a project more than once, I can't get the first report I got. The project that didn't give an error in the first analysis gives an error in the 3rd analysis. I wonder why this happens. I don't know how to prevent this. I'm waiting for your help on this.. have a nice day, good work.
Could you add your project?
 
"Levent Özpak":1xrsc0bv" said:
"msami":1xrsc0bv" said:
good day. I am a 1 year civil engineer. and after graduating i started drawing the project directly using ide 7. visuality, ease of use, report section are all very useful. but when I analyze a project more than once, I can't get the first report. The project that does not give an error in the first analysis gives an error in the third analysis. I wonder why this is caused. I don't know how to prevent this. I am waiting for your help in this matter.. have a nice day, good work.
Could you add your project?
is not just for a project. It's a common problem I come across. Because of this problem, the contractors (especially civil engineers) with whom I draw projects remain hesitant. what can i do about it..
 
"msami":3dw4f7ix" said:
"Levent Özpak":3dw4f7ix" said:
"msami":3dw4f7ix" said:
good day. I am a civil engineer for 1 year. And after graduation, I started drawing the project directly using ide 7. I started. visuality, ease of use, report part are all very useful. but when I analyze a project more than once, I can't get the first report I got. The project that didn't give an error in the first analysis gives an error in the 3rd analysis. I wonder why this happens. I don't know how to prevent this. about this I am waiting for your help.. have a nice day, good work.
Could you add your project?
not just for a project. It is a problem I often encounter. Because of this problem, the contractors (especially civil engineers) that I draw projects are hesitant. What can I do about it..
There is no such thing as you describe in the program. You have already said that I am a civil engineer for 1 year. The reason for this situation is that you are a civil engineer for one year. And the program your not getting the training. If you add any project where this occurs, I can tell you where you went wrong. If you say it's a general situation, enter anything and add Projeji
 
"msami":2ejkg1w7" said:
"Levent Özpak":2ejkg1w7" said:
"msami":2ejkg1w7" said:
good day. I am a civil engineer for 1 year. I started. visuality, ease of use, report part are all very useful. but when I analyze a project more than once, I can't get the first report I got. The project that didn't give an error in the first analysis gives an error in the 3rd analysis. I wonder why this happens. I don't know how to prevent this. about this I am waiting for your help.. have a nice day, good work.
Could you add your project?
not just for a project. It is a problem I often encounter. Because of this problem, the contractors (especially civil engineers) that I draw projects are hesitant. What can I do about it..
It is important for us to help you if you add a project that does not give an error when you receive a report after the first analysis, but will give an error when we receive a report after the third analysis...
 
Hello dear colleagues. I am waiting for help from you colleagues and admins about my project that I have been trying to solve for a few days. I tried to create the structural system by trying not to spoil the architectural quality, but I could not save the "M" errors I got in K26 and K27 beams, even though I enlarged the sections to the maximum level allowed by the regulation. Do you think there is an improvement that can be made without disturbing the architecture of the carrier system? I'm waiting for your suggestions. (There are B errors in a few columns. I can save them somehow, but I couldn't find a solution to the beams with M error) Since the file size is 6mb, I give the upload address
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"antediluvian35":2me3bt5y" said:
Hello my dear colleagues. I am asking for help from you colleagues and admins regarding my project that I have been trying to solve for a few days. I tried to create the structural system by trying not to spoil the architectural quality, but the "M" errors I got on K26 and K27 beams, the cross sections were in accordance with the regulations. I couldn't save it even though I enlarged it to the maximum level it allows. Do you think there is an improvement that can be made without disturbing the architecture of the carrier system. I am waiting for your solution suggestions. I'm giving an upload address
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
The link you provided is not opening ...
 
"HakanŞahin":27kw78cz" said:
"antediluvian35":27kw78cz" said:
Hello my dear colleagues. I am waiting for help from you colleagues and admins about my project that I have been trying to solve for a few days. I tried to create the structural system by trying not to spoil the architectural quality, but I could not save the "M" errors I got in K26 and K27 beams, even though I enlarged the sections to the maximum level allowed by the regulation. Do you think there is an improvement that can be made without disturbing the architecture of the carrier system? I'm waiting for your suggestions. (There are B errors in a few columns. I can save them somehow, but I couldn't find a solution to the beams with M error) Since the file size is 6mb, I give the upload address
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
The link you provided does not open...
Hakan, I just tried and it opens With the extension called "Zenmate" active in the Google Chrome browser, I opened and downloaded it without any problems (it also opens with the dns settings entering youtube). If it still doesn't open, if you suggest an alternative installation method, I'll try to upload it that way.
 
Hello. There is pool modeling in the program, after the pool analysis, by entering the desired diameter and spacing in the existing reinforcement section, I can see whether the reinforcement I selected is sufficient. However, for a small swimming pool (12x7.5m) project that I have done, a request is made by the engineer in the municipality, 'show me an account of how you chose the equipment you used on the curtain and foundation'. As a result, a 1.5m high pool will be curtain elements subjected to different shear forces when full and empty. Related to this, I need a calculation method where we can find the amount of As reinforcement according to the shear force and the normal force for the foundation. Thanks in advance to anyone who can help.
 
"HakanŞahin":gsjmzkb4" said:
"antediluvian35":gsjmzkb4" said:
Hello my dear colleagues. I am waiting for help from you colleagues and admins about my project that I have been trying to solve for a few days. I tried to create the structural system by trying not to spoil the architectural quality, but I could not save the "M" errors I got in K26 and K27 beams, even though I enlarged the sections to the maximum level allowed by the regulation. Do you think there is an improvement that can be made without disturbing the architecture of the carrier system? I'm waiting for your suggestions. (There are B errors in a few columns. I can save them somehow, but I couldn't find a solution to the beams with M error) Since the file size is 6mb, I give the upload address
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
The link you gave does not open...
As far as I can see, there are 20 walls under k26 and 27 in architecture. Have you tried 25/60. Since I don't have time, I did the analysis. Since it is already on the kitchen side, there is no problem in the installation according to the horizontal beam....
 
Good day, as can be seen in the picture, the beams are not fully joined... therefore the flooring is not smooth... even using the contour option, a healthy flooring is not laid... but when the existing model is shifted to a place on the right in the same area, the beams merge properly..... meaning I couldn't give... Can you review and return..:??
 
Back
Top