Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[Levent Özpak]

Thanks. By the way, the effect of cassette and ribbed floors on beams is much more realistic in semi-rigid diaphragm than full-rigid diaphragm. The reason for this is of course the way the analysis system is constructed and the shell system should be taken into account. For this reason, I think I will choose the way of designing with typical beams of the same width. Let me also mention one thing about the beam reinforced concrete window. While changing the additional reinforcements of the beams, the option to update the adjacent support is very nice, but this option does not work when doing this collectively. It updates when done individually. A There is a situation that I think is related to the angle of continuity, which is considered unimportant. Sometimes, when two spring beams sitting on the same column are continuous, the right and left additions of one do not match and it is possible to calculate separately for both. Good work.

With the situation you mentioned If you can add a sample project for r, we'll review it. Good work

 

[msami]

I don't want my name to be written in the license number section at the top of the report, what should I do? I will be very happy if you can help me urgently.

 

[izmirlimuhendis]

Why is the beam reinforcement corresponding to the curtain being cut? Why isn't it constantly drawn?

 

[Levent Özpak]

why is the beam reinforcement corresponding to the shear cut off. why is it not constantly drawn?

The beam extensions are given in this way, since the longitudinal reinforcement of the beam has an anchorage of 50 fi in the curtain and generally the reinforcements of these beams do not meet. There is no harm in drawing it this way Note: It is registered in our wish list for continuous drawing of beams connected to the curtain in the long direction.

 

[yagmurcankocak]

Good afternoon, I have designed and drawn a building. After all the beams and columns were finished, the architect wanted some of the axles to be shifted by certain distances (around 50cm). Any chance of scrolling the struct in one go without breaking the static model of the struct? In other words, the axles of the building are 5m and there are 6 axles in total. I want the distance between the 2nd axle and the 3rd axle to be 525 cm. Some beams' nodes are not moved when I move them with Move. Is there an easy way to do this, or do I have to draw that axis of the building from scratch?

 

[Levent Özpak]

Good afternoon, I designed and drew a building. After all the beams and columns were finished, the architect wanted some axles to be shifted at certain distances (around 50cm). In other words, the axes of the building are 5m and there are 6 axles in total. I want the distance between the 2nd axis and the 3rd axis to be 525 cm. When I move it with Move, the nodes of some beams are not moved. Is there an easy way to do this, or is there an easy way to do this from the beginning Do I need to draw ?

Hi, Nodal points that are not located in axis intersections are not affected by the move. For these points to be moved, the axis must be on the joint in both the X and y directions. Good work

 

[yagmurcankocak]

Good afternoon, I designed and drew a building. After all the beams and columns were finished, the architect wanted some of the axles to be shifted by certain distances (around 50cm). Any chance of scrolling the struct in one go without breaking the static model of the struct? In other words, the axles of the building are 5m and there are 6 axles in total. I want the distance between the 2nd axle and the 3rd axle to be 525 cm. Some beams' nodes are not moved when I move them with Move. Is there an easy way to do this, or do I have to draw that axis of the building from the beginning?

Hi, Nodes that are not located in the axis intersections are not affected by the move. In order to carry these points, there must be an axis on the joint in both the X and y directions. Good work

Hello again, The answer to my question was not exactly what you said, but I found it. Let me explain for other users who have a similar problem: The answer to my question is actually the "replace/move node" command. As you say, when we move the axis completely, all the nodes at the axis intersection point come together. But the secondary beam connections are not coming. For this reason, it seems like the best solution to use the "move node" command to shift the axles in a structure where it has secondary beams, then delete the axles and redraw them in appropriate dimensions. Thank you for your help and quick response, Good work

 

[NYILMAZ]

We cannot select certain objects in the Scale (reference) command and scale them all at the same time. Sample; select all / scale / Reference / exits selection. Example 2: text / select all / scale / reference / exits selection. Whereas; We can do text / select all / move. I expected it to be like this.

 

[infernal]

Good day.. When defining curtains in a project, we want to create curtains by defining the titles in the form of columns (eg 80x25) and between them with a panel (eg: 250x25) instead of using the column command. but we see in the curtain drawings that the reinforcement is also done in the form of a column header in a separate panel. Although we make curtains manually in this way, why doesn't the program see it as a single curtain and do the fittings accordingly? In the same situation made with sta4cad, the program can equip the middle panel only as the middle part of the curtain. The pictures show the situation more clearly. the project in question is idecad static; The situation in question with sta4cad;

 

[NYILMAZ]

In IdeStatik, this situation is optional. In the attached pictures, there are two different drawings for the same curtain.

 

[infernal]

This situation is optional in İdeStatik. There are two different drawings for the same curtain in the attached pictures.

Thank you very much for your information, Mr. NYILMAZ

 

[infernal]

have a nice day. In idecad static I usually have problems with continuous base drawings. As an example, I cannot define the foundation beam under the P4 curtain in the attached project. I also have my doubts that the continuous foundations that I have defined under the P1 and P2 curtains are correctly defined. Sometimes the analysis results (soil stresses) are 0 when I draw the foundation from the top and bottom column/wall joint points on the same axis. I want to know the reason for these. I would be glad if you help.

 

[NYILMAZ]

good day. I usually have problems with continuous foundation drawings in idecad statics. As an example, I cannot define the foundation beam under the P4 curtain in the project I have attached. Also, I have doubts that the continuous foundations that I have defined under the P1 and P2 curtains are correctly defined. When I constantly draw foundations from the top and bottom column/wall joint points on the same axis, sometimes the analysis results (soil stresses) are 0. I want to know why. I would appreciate your help.

You entered your curtains as column objects. This is an error not, but I recommend you to enter it as a curtain object. You will have the chance to model these elements as a curtain (panel) object, as well as a shell. When you define a continuous basis under the elements you enter as a panel object, you should define a continuous basis starting from one end of the panel object and ending at the other end. but a correct continuous basis l recipe. If you define a curtain as a column object, you only have to hold it from that node, since the column object has only one node. In such cases, the column's nodal point is at the far point (in your project, the joint point of the column, which is at the D-3 axis intersection for the P4 curtain, is at the D-4 point) gives more accurate results in terms of drawings. In the current situation, when you look at the curtain detail drawings, you can see that a foundation detail is actually drawn under the P4 curtain. In this case, you can correct the deficiencies in the basic application with 2D drawing elements. The same goes for pitches P5, 6, 7, 8 as well as pitches P1, P2. You can remove the columns S5, S6 on the right and left ends of the P3 curtain, which is already on all floors. But instead of dealing with all this, I recommend you to use panel objects to get more accurate results. Also, take care to press your foundations symmetrically as much as possible.

 

[infernal]

You entered your curtains as column objects. This is not an error, but I recommend entering it as a curtain object. You will have the chance to model these elements, which you enter as curtain (panel) objects, as shells. When defining a continuous basis under the elements you enter as panel objects, you must define a continuous basis starting from one end of the panel object and ending at the other end. This would only be a correct continuous basic recipe. If you define a curtain as a column object, you only have to hold it from that node, since the column object has only one node. In such cases, the column's nodal point is at the far point (in your project, the joint point of the column, which is at the D-3 axis intersection for the P4 curtain, is at the D-4 point) gives more accurate results in terms of drawings. In the current situation, when you look at the curtain detail drawings, you can see that a foundation detail is actually drawn under the P4 curtain. In this case, you can correct the deficiencies in the basic application with 2D drawing elements. The same goes for pitches P5, 6, 7, 8 as well as pitches P1, P2. You can remove the columns S5, S6 on the right and left ends of the P3 curtain, which is already on all floors. But instead of dealing with all this, I recommend you to use panel objects to get more accurate results. Also, take care to print your foundations symmetrically as much as possible.

Thank you Mr. NYILMAZ for your advice. "You can remove the columns S5, S6 on the right and left ends of the P3 curtain that continues on all floors." You said, but we made that application on the terrace floor in order to leave the columns S5 and S6 empty. Should we continue the 70 cm panel at the ends of the panel on the terrace floor? also, do you mean by symmetrical suppression in terms of their offset?

 

[NYILMAZ]

Dear NYILMAZ, thank you for your advice. You said "You can remove the columns S5, S6 at the right and left ends of the P3 curtain that continues on all floors." However, we did not use that application to leave the columns S5 and S6 blank on the terrace floor. (There will be a door opening to the roof, etc.) what do you recommend for this? Shall we continue the 70 cm panel at the ends of the panel on the terrace floor?

If the problem is only to open the door, you can do this by defining the door gap inside the panel.

also do you mean symmetrical suppression in terms of their eccentricity?

Yes, as you think, I am talking about symmetrical suppression in terms of their eccentricity. Good luck with.

 

[celikbey]

The overlap of the curtain at the -1.00 level and the slab edge at the 0.00 level Hello. What I have is a dormitory project to be restored. There is a basement with a height of 3.00 meters and 2 meters of it will remain underground. I am making curtains of 2 m part, the remaining 1 m part will be covered with stone and I have console flooring at the ceiling level (0.00). I don't want beams on the forehead of the slab and therefore I want to go with the slab edge. Since the edge is on the same line as the curtain, the program gives the error "tile edge overlaps". When I put the forehead beam I mentioned, the error disappears. How can we solve this problem? The project (saved with 7.022) is attached in compressed form. I need to get to the solution as soon as possible. I will be grateful if you could help me. Good day... Edit: The jeans have been arranged.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: The curtain at -1.00 and the slab edge at 0.00 ça

Hello. I have a dormitory project to be restored. There is a basement floor with a height of 3.00 meters and a 2 m. I am making a 2 m part of the curtain, the remaining 1 m part will be covered with stone and I have a console slab at the ceiling level (0.00). I don't want a beam on the forehead of the slab, so I want to cross it with the slab edge. Since it is on the same line as the tile, the program gives the error "The slab edge overlaps". When I put the forehead beam on the side I mentioned, the error disappears. How can we solve this problem? The project (saved with 7.022) is attached as a compressed. I would be very happy.

Hello, There is no problem with the slab formations in the basement. You can ignore the message in the geometry control. Or you can place the slab edges on the panel a few cm. You can draw from it. Note: The elevations of some columns on the C axis are not compatible with the beams to which they are attached. Good work

 

[celikbey]

Re: The curtain at -1.00 level and the floor edge at 0.00 level ça

Hello. What I have is a dormitory project to be restored. There is a basement with a height of 3.00 meters and 2 meters of it will remain underground. I am making curtains of 2 m part, the remaining 1 m part will be covered with stone and I have console flooring at the ceiling level (0.00). I don't want beams on the forehead of the slab and therefore I want to go with the slab edge. Since the edge is on the same line as the curtain, the program gives the error "tile edge overlaps". When I put the forehead beam I mentioned, the error disappears. How can we solve this problem? The project (saved with 7.022) is attached in compressed form. I need to get to the solution as soon as possible. I will be grateful if you could help me.

Hello, There does not seem to be a problem with the slab formations in the basement. You can ignore the message in the geometry control. Or a few cm of the panel on the edges of the flooring that coincides with the panel. You can draw from the outside. Note: The elevations of some columns on the C axis are not compatible with the beams to which they are attached. Good work

If the error is not a problem with the analysis, it is fine if it does not make a wrong solution. You are right. I fixed those columns at the last minute. His jeans are like that. And one last thing I will ask: Can you zoom in and examine the columns and connecting beams in C5? The junction of the beams does not seem to coincide with the column, even if it is very slightly. Will this be a problem? Thanks.

 

[celikbey]

I would also have a suggestion about the program; I wish there was an option showing beam loads on our floor. When we hold down a key or click a command from the menu, the wall load in t/m at the end of the beam will be written on the beam alongside its name and dimensions. Forgotten wall loads create serious problems after the project is delivered. If there is a plugin like I mentioned, it would be very efficient... Thank you...

 

[HakanŞahin]

I would also have a suggestion regarding the program: I wish there was an option to show beam loads on the floor we are in. When we hold down a key or click a command from the menu, we see the name and dimensions on the beam in t/m at the end of the beam Wall load will be written. Forgotten wall loads create serious problems after submitting the project. It would be very efficient if there is an add-on like I mentioned... Thanks...

Hello The facility you mentioned is available in version 8. From the 3D model, in the "Visualization" section, element dimensions, wall loads, slab loads, element negatives, diagrams, etc. are painted and presented visually on the element monitoring screen Example screenshot for wall loads: