Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[2m proje]

Hello there; You have already given the answer yourself. The more water load on the raft, the more you should take. Also, don't forget to give the curtains a water load.

 

[gimni1907]

Hi; You already gave the answer yourself. You should take as much water load as there is on the raft. Also, do not forget to give water load to the curtains.

Then the loads taken as 0.5 are wrong, is it correct? In other words, in the case where the height is 1.5 meters, the projects passed by the municipality were always 0.5, I did not understand this situation very much yes, I entered the water load on the curtains.

 

[2m proje]

There is no wrong example

 

[ryildiz]

Is there an option to automatically join the beam reinforcements to the support? otherwise we have to do it all by clicking "Merge".

 

[Levent Özpak]

Is there an option to automatically join the beam reinforcements to the support? Or we have to click "Join" and do it all. However, since the length of the longitudinal reinforcement exceeds 12 m, it is overlapped.As the length of the bottom reinforcement exceeds 12 meters in total in the two beams, TDY 3.4.3.1.C) is divided at the support according to figure 3.7.

 

[ryildiz]

Is there an option to automatically combine beam reinforcements on the support? otherwise, we have to click "Combine" and do all of them.

Hello, Beam reinforcements are automatically combined unless intervened. In the picture you attached, the upper reinforcement is joined at the support, but the length of the longitudinal reinforcement is 12 m. Overlay was made because it passed . Since the length of the bottom reinforcement exceeds 12 meters in total in the two beams, TDY 3.4.3.1.C) is divided at the support according to figure 3.7.

Why are the lower reinforcements of the beams always divided at the supports, while the upper reinforcements are not? (because when the joint or split is in the support, it also affects the upper support reinforcement) Can it be offered as an option? Or am I missing something in the settings? (fixing one by one manually can be a problem in large projects)

 

[YasinTezel]

Hi By using the marked options in the Beam settings, you can ensure that the reinforcement is continuous or split on the support. You can select all beams and make this adjustment at once. When you analyze, the reinforcements will be arranged by taking this situation into account.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Why the bottom reinforcement of the beam is always split at the supports, while the top reinforcements are not? Can it be offered as an option? Or am I missing something in the settings? (manually correcting one by one can be a problem in large projects)

Splitting the upper reinforcement in the support In the Beam settings/Rebars tab, uncheck "Continuously draw Top Rebars with adjacent beam at right end" and perform analysis.

 

[ryildiz]

Thank you, Mr. Levent

Why are the upper reinforcements not divided while the lower beams are always divided at the supports? Can it be offered as an option? Or am I missing something in the settings? (manually correcting one by one can be a problem in large projects)

If you want to split the upper reinforcement at the support, in the Beam settings/Rebars tab, uncheck the line "Continuously draw the Upper Rebars with the adjacent beam at the right end" and perform the analysis. (This may result in increased reinforcement in the support and Joint shear safety (B) problems.)

 

[ryildiz]

In my attached project, although the nodal point of the continuous foundations is the same, the foundations are drawn separately in the drawing. No problem with geometry control. And in some fundamentals I couldn't fix the ace error. On normal floors, although the k91-92 beams are in the same plane and have the same dimensions, there is a problem in the drawing. Project

 

[NYILMAZ]

Enter the general reinforced concrete parameters in the / parameters section / under the reinforced concrete menu. In the Always accept beams with small angle difference between them, enter an angle value. It will be continuous.

 

[Levent Özpak]

In my attached project, although the joint point of the foundations is the same, the foundations are drawn separately in the drawing. There is no problem in geometry control. And I could not fix the ace error in some foundations.

-Tk99-Tk100 foundations have an angle difference between them. In the Reinforced Concrete/Parameters/General Reinforced Concrete Parameters dialog, enter the angle difference between the foundation beams in the line "Continuously accept beams with small angle difference between them" and perform analysis.(Maximum 30 degrees can be entered) Foundations will be drawn continuously. -For the solution of AS(-) problem in continuous foundations , Tick larger stirrup diameters in the Continuous Foundation Reinforcement Selection Dialog

There is a problem in the drawing although the k91-92 beams are on the same plane in the same plane on normal floors. "Cut" option is checked. Uncheck it and analyze. Note: In version 7, no superstructure interactive solution is foreseen in the rafter raft foundation system. If the ground group is C or D, since Tdy 2007 requires an interactive superstructure solution, it would be appropriate to design the foundation system as a beamless raft in terms of program and regulation compliance. Good work

 

[meryemakdil]

I get a combination error in the shear force (B) on the columns. My Vmax value is negative, I wonder why?

 

[Levent Özpak]

I get a union error in the shear force (B) on the columns, why is my Vmax value negative?

Could you attach the project file?