Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

For Vis/vik >0.7 status in strong column weak beam control, are columns that do not fulfill this condition and are in Nd<0.1Acfck status at the lower and upper joints included in the 'Vis' section of the program report? On the other hand, for beams that are inserted perpendicular to the long direction of the wall (walls working like columns in the short side direction), strong column control could be neglected in the walls into which they are inserted, it is possible to include it in 'vis' in the reports.
 
"ghost_13":26ymzb9e" said:
For Vis/vik >0.7 state in strong column weak beam control, are the columns that do not fulfill this condition and are in Nd<0.1Acfck state at the lower and upper nodes included in the 'Vis' section of the program report? For beams that are inserted perpendicular to the long direction of the wall (walls working like columns in the short side direction), strong column control could be neglected in the walls into which they are inserted, it is a case of including it in 'vis' in the reports.
-TDY 2007 Article 3.3.6.1 As stated, columns satisfying the Nd<0.1*Ac*Fck condition are taken into account in the calculation of Vis even if Equation 3.3 is not met. ) and are not included in the Vis account. Good work
 
"ghost_13":rbh2t9og" said:
For Vis/vik >0.7 state in strong column weak beam control, are the columns that do not fulfill this condition and are in Nd<0.1Acfck state at the lower and upper nodes included in the 'Vis' section of the program report? For beams that are inserted perpendicular to the long direction of the wall (walls working like columns in the short side direction), strong column control could be neglected in the walls into which they are inserted, it is a case of including it in 'vis' in the reports.
-TDY 2007 Article 3.3.6.1 As stated, columns satisfying the Nd<0.1*Ac*Fck condition are taken into account in the calculation of Vis even if Equation 3.3 is not met. ) and are not included in the Vis account. Good work
 
project gives an error in analysis My project gives an error during analysis, it says to have a geometry check done, but there is no error in geometry control. can you check it. My contact number is 05442058895... it is being prepared in ide7, the project is failing. concluding. download link :
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
I wonder what is the reason for the overlap in the inclined beam expansions? It normally happens like the K330-331 joint, but there is nesting in the other beams. How can I solve it.
 
Hello, You have sent the project of this situation you mentioned to the technical service by e-mail. The drawing of beams inside each other is a situation related to the drawing formed in the beams connected to the inclined columns in the horizontal direction. Proposal; After fixing the reinforcements of the relevant beams in the Reinforced Concrete dialog, move the beams and their connected columns to another project with the "copy to file" and "paste from file" command. Make the columns perpendicular and take the beam expansions. Move the beam details to your project with the "copy to file" and "paste from file" commands. In order to draw the reinforcements of the beams connected to the inclined columns in the other direction within the beam, enter an angle value in the -Continuously accept beams with small angle difference- line in the General Reinforced Concrete Parameters. You can make other necessary arrangements by using the program's two-dimensional possibilities. Among our notes is the case of drawing the beams connected to the inclined columns inside each other. Good work
 
"Levent Özpak":2efvkag1" said:
Hi, You have sent the project of this situation you mentioned to the technical service by e-mail. The drawing of beams is related to the drawing formed in the beams connected to the inclined columns in the horizontal direction. Suggestion; After fixing the reinforcements of the relevant beams in the Reinforced Concrete dialog , Move the beams and the connected columns to another project with the "copy to file" and "paste from file" command. Make the columns perpendicular and get the beam expansions. Move the beam details to your project again with the "copy to file" and "paste from file" commands. In order to draw the reinforcements of the beams connected in the beam, enter an angle value in the line -Continuously accept beams with small angle difference- in the General Reinforced Concrete Parameters. You can make other necessary adjustments by using the program's two-dimensional possibilities. Good work
There is no problem in the part that connects to the columns, I already arrange them by hand. However, when an inclined beam is attached to the straight beam as in the k330-331 connection, it is normal. In this project, they are also intertwined.
 
"MrtGrsl":219cqs2t" said:
"Levent Özpak":219cqs2t" said:
Hi, You have sent the project you mentioned to the technical service by e-mail. The drawing of beams inside each other is a situation related to the drawing formed in the beams connected to the inclined columns in the horizontal direction. Proposal; After fixing the reinforcements of the relevant beams in the Reinforced Concrete dialog, move the beams and their connected columns to another project with the "copy to file" and "paste from file" command. Make the columns perpendicular and take the beam expansions. Move the beam details to your project with the "copy to file" and "paste from file" commands. In order to draw the reinforcements of the beams connected to the inclined columns in the other direction within the beam, enter an angle value in the -Continuously accept beams with small angle difference- line in the General Reinforced Concrete Parameters. You can make other necessary arrangements by using the program's two-dimensional possibilities. Among our notes is the case of drawing the beams connected to the inclined columns inside each other. Good work
There is no problem in joining the columns, I'm already arranging them by hand. However, when an inclined beam is connected to the straight beam as in the k330-331 connection, it was normal. In this project, they also intertwined.
In General Reinforced Concrete Parameters -The angle difference between them is small Enter an angle value, "for example, 1 degree" in the accept beams with continuous line.
 
"Levent Özpak":2x3flzxq" said:
"MrtGrsl":2x3flzxq" said:
"Levent Özpak":2x3flzxq" said:
Hi, You have sent the project of this situation you mentioned to the technical service by e-mail. A situation related to the drawing formed by the beams connected to the inclined columns in the horizontal direction. Suggestion; After fixing the reinforcements of the relevant beams in the Reinforced Concrete dialog, move the beams and the columns they are connected to another project with the "copy to file" and "paste from file" command. Make the columns vertical and get the beam expansions Move the beam details to your project again with the "copy to file" and "paste from file" commands.In order to draw the reinforcements of the beams connected to the inclined columns in the other direction within the beam, enter an angle value in the line -Continuously accept beams with a small angle difference- in the General Reinforced Concrete Parameters. You can make other necessary arrangements by using the program's two-dimensional possibilities. mesi status is among our notes. Good work
There is no problem in joining the columns, I already arrange them manually. However, when an inclined beam is connected to the straight beam as in the k330-331 connection, it was normal. In this project, they also intertwined.
In General Reinforced Concrete Parameters -The angle difference between them is small Enter an angle value, "for example, 1 degree" in the line "Always accept beams".
Thanks Mr. Levent, the problem was solved. Until now, this setting was normal. I always felt the need to ask him. Good work...
 
Hello, It gives 3 types of values in foundation solutions in raft-based structures: -Negative stress control - Average Stress control - Max. strain control My question is max. on strain control. Especially in buildings that are relatively narrow for their height, the average stress remains below the ground safety stress, but max. The strain turns out to be quite high. However, since the program autocontrols according to the average stress, max. Even if the tension is very high, it does not show as a problem in the printouts. As I understand (or should say I know) local support collapses occur when the soil safety stress is exceeded under certain columns. When the foundation moves in this way, the loads are normally redistributed (stresses under the perimeter column begin to increase, until the stress at the point where the max. With this logic, shouldn't the program actually throw an error? I am working as a static project controller in the Directorate of Development and Urbanization of a municipality. Just for this reason, we are having serious discussions with some engineers. Their defense is that "if there was a problem here, the program would have failed anyway". (I know too, not a program engineer, but the engineer should control the program. But here is Turkey, who knows how to push the buttons of the program, is doing a project now...) Can I get your opinion on this matter? Rain Can KOÇAK
 
"yagmurcankocak":kt8efxsl" said:
Hi, It gives 3 types of values in foundation solutions in raft based structures: -Negative stress control - Average Stress control - Max stress control My question is about max stress control Ö But program autocontrol according to average stress
Hello, The designer informs the program whether the program will be controlled according to the average or maximum stress. It is because the developer has selected the option "Make stress control according to average stress" If the option is not checked, the program will show it as a problem in the report.
 
An account must be made in order to use a new building, whose project has already been drawn as a residence, as an educational institution.
 
"MrtGrsl":1ffr62gg" said:
An account needs to be made in order for a new building, the current project of which has been drawn as a residence, to be used as an educational institution. How should this calculation be. Can you help?
Hello, In case the purpose of use of the existing building changes, it is generally performance analysis is requested for the structure. In the link below, information about the path to be followed in the program for linear performance analysis is given.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Also TDY See 2007 Chapter 7. Good work
 
"Levent Özpak":6x7cfwog" said:
"MrtGrsl":6x7cfwog" said:
An account needs to be made in order for a new building whose project has been drawn as a residence, to be used as an educational institution. How should this account be? Can you help?[/ quote] Hello, In case the purpose of use of the existing building changes, it is generally requested to perform a performance analysis for the building. In the link below, information about the path to be followed in the program for linear performance analysis is given.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Also see TDY 2007 Chapter 7. Good work
Thank you Mr. Levent, good work.
 
"sereze":2l25wsel" said:
To observe the deformation of the structure, the deformations are slightly enlarged, how can we change that magnification factor?
You can change it from the Structure Tree/Deformation/Growth Factor.
 
There is a pool project that we are currently doing and we have to solve the raft foundation in the form of a curtain. The part I want to ask is how much should we take the Q load of the raft flooring? When I asked some of my fellow engineers, they said 0.5 tf/m2, but it was not enough for me. The depth of the pool is 1.5 meters, so 1.5 tons of weight comes to 1 m2 area.
 
Back
Top