Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

First of all, I would like to wish everyone a happy Ramadan. If I come to the subject, if I had actually entered the reinforced concrete from scratch for this project, I would have spent less effort than I am currently dealing with. However, since I want to know the reason for the error, I share it on the forum, maybe there is something we are missing. I'm reporting what happened to me 12 times a year. I entered the project in a very normal way, calculated and made a preliminary calculation for the architectural drawing, I opened the project that I loved and closed 2 3 days ago, and I thought I should add the ornaments that were added later to the system, but the floor edge did not cut the beam. In summary, I cannot add cantilever flooring to the existing beams in the attached project. Thanks
 
"professional":1t9fbgql" said:
First of all, I would like to wish everyone a happy Ramadan. If I come to the topic, if I had actually entered reinforced concrete from scratch for this project, I would have spent less effort than I am currently trying to do. However, I want to know the reason for the error, so I am sharing it on the forum, maybe there is something we are missing. I am reporting the incident that happened to me 12 times a year. I entered the project in a normal way, calculated and made a preliminary calculation for the architectural drawing, I opened the project that I loved and closed 2 3 days ago, and I opened the project today and I wanted to add the ornaments added later to the system, but the floor edge did not cut the beam. At the moment, I cannot add cantilever slabs to the existing beams in the attached project. Thanks
Click to expand...
Hello, There is no problem in your project, I drew console slabs in the places you circled, Maybe you did not draw the slab edge until the beam axis here. F axis coincides with the beam axis, Slab edge The beam will split when you draw it up to the F axis. possible. The project is attached.
 
Thank you for your attention, it is very strange right now that the other pc in the office is not a problem, but I can't throw it on my pc again :) Anyway, fasting, I don't want to worry about it more I wanted to get information about the price of the update [email protected] can I be informed? Thank you again for your interest and I wish you good work.
 
Greetings first. In a project we are currently preparing, we want to apply unreinforced bored piles. Previously, I have seen solutions in almost all simple residential buildings with a 3 by 3 grid of 65 cm R and a pile depth of 10 or 12 m. I also prepared a grid in this way. However, I saw end effects and bearing capacity verifications in the report. and I saw in the calculation results that the normal forces are at least 4 times less on average than the safety resistances. But now I have a few questions I want to ask. 1- I did not determine the adhesion value (and other parameters that I am not aware of at the moment) during the calculation phase, how can I determine it, that is, I enter the program. 2- I see that the bearing capacity verifications are positive. Are there any other negative effects in the end effects or in different calculations? 3- We will make bored piles without reinforcement, based on these calculations, does it create a negative negative if we can't do it without reinforcement? 4- Is there a different improvement on pile calculation in ide 8 versions?
 
Hello, In the attached file, I want the slab edge elements on the (3) and (G) axis of the RD9 Foundation at -10.50 elevation to be on the (T1) and (T4) axis, but when I do this, they coincide with the slab edge lines of the -6.50 level foundation and I can't lay the foundations. In short, the foundation under the curtains should have a 40 cm embankment. Can you help on how to do it? Thanks
 
"windtalker":3lvss7el" said:
Hi, In the attached file, I want the slab edge elements on the (3) and (G) axis of the RD9 Foundation at -10.50 elevation, but when I do this, I want the slab edge elements to be on the (T1) and (T4) axis. It coincides with the slab edge lines of the foundation at ,50 level and I cannot build the foundations. In short, the foundation under the curtains must have a 40 cm embankment. Can you help on how to do it? Thanks
Click to expand...
Hello, the data entry you mentioned cannot be made on the same foundation floor, but if you make a different floor at 400 elevation "You can do it. Also, how will a raft system be built as you said? It seems like 4 meters of excavation must be made along the T1 and T4 axis first, and then filling must be made on top of it. Then, a raft will be laid on top of that fill. In short, how is it in situ?" I will be glad if you write about how to do it.
 
Hello Mr. Hakan, The application will be done exactly as you said. I created the attached project by following what you said. Is there a problem in terms of data entry? The RD8 raft foundation will be built on site, connected to the bulkheads, so are the loads and moments from the rd8 raft transferred to the panels in the program? Is it possible to get the panel raft joint detail? I would be glad if my experienced colleagues also give their opinions. The building is planned as a treatment plant, how does the hydrostatic pressure in the pools of 10 m depth affect the structure, do I need to add additional curtains or beams? According to the attached file, what would you recommend for the raft joint detail attached to the curtains at the -6.50 level? Thank you in advance for your answers. download link:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"windtalker":3qiull1b" said:
Hello Mr. Hakan, The application will be done exactly as you said. I created the attached project by applying what you said. Is there a problem in terms of data entry? Are the moments transferred to the panels?
Click to expand...
Yes, you can observe from the 3D frame that the panels and the raft are connected to each other by rigid arms. The structure is solved together with the raft, panels and slabs. [/quote] You can get raft and panel drawings. Raft reinforcements will be folded into the panel. I don't know what the panel raft joint detail is. Good work
 
Hello Hakan, Thank you for your reply. I asked if there could be a special reinforcement detail, your answer was enough. I wish you good work.
 
Hello, I am sending the report of a retaining wall project attached. The point I am stuck at is the height of the retaining wall while the height of the retaining wall is 7m, the moment arm given for the first row of "static active lateral ground pressure force" in the "horizontal and vertical loads" table on page 2. However, as can be seen in the diagram above, this moment arm distance must be H/3. Even if I change the height of the retaining wall, the moment arm remains at 1.41m. What would be the reason? Shouldn't this moment arm change depending on the height of the retaining wall? Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK
 
"yagmurcankocak":20rz4euy" said:
Hi, I am sending the report of a retaining wall project attached. The point I am stuck on is the "static active lateral ground pressure force" in the first row in the "horizontal and vertical loads" table on page 2, when the height of the retaining wall is 7m. The given moment arm is 1.41m. However, as can be seen in the diagram above, this moment arm distance needs to be H/3. Even if I change the height of the retaining wall, the moment arm remains at 1.41m. What could be the reason? This moment arm does not need to change depending on the height of the retaining wall. Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK
Click to expand...
Hello, The cohesion effect of the ground is taken into account in the retaining wall. If the cohesion value is entered as zero, the moment arm will appear as 2.33 meters. Good work
 
"yagmurcankocak":2ggz3l3u" said:
Hi, I am sending the report of a retaining wall project attached. The point I am stuck on is the "static active lateral ground pressure force" in the first row in the "horizontal and vertical loads" table on page 2, when the height of the retaining wall is 7m. The given moment arm is 1.41m. However, as can be seen in the diagram above, this moment arm distance needs to be H/3. Even if I change the height of the retaining wall, the moment arm remains at 1.41m. What could be the reason? This moment arm does not need to change depending on the height of the retaining wall. Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK
Click to expand...
Hello Moment arm is calculated depending on cohesion and soil height.If you take the cohesion as 0, the moment arm is calculated as HSoil/3.
 
"YasinTezel":1qewnvfn" said:
"yagmurcankocak":1qewnvfn" said:
Hi, I am sending the report of a retaining wall project attached. The point I am stuck at is the height of the retaining wall while the height of the retaining wall is 7m, the moment arm given for the first row of "static active lateral ground pressure force" in the "horizontal and vertical loads" table on page 2. However, as can be seen in the diagram above, this moment arm distance must be H/3. Even if I change the height of the retaining wall, the moment arm remains at 1.41m. What would be the reason? Shouldn't this moment arm change depending on the height of the retaining wall? Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK
Click to expand...
Hello Moment arm is calculated based on cohesion and soil height. If you take the cohesion as 0, the moment arm is calculated as HEarth/3.
Click to expand...
Good evening again, he uses the expression "cohesion neglected" while giving the formula for the calculation of the active and passive pressure coefficients in the article 6.4.1.1 of the Earthquake Code. But apart from that, shouldn't the effect point of the total charge calculated from this coefficient (whether cohesive or neglected) must be at a distance of H/3 anyway, since it spreads out in a triangular fashion? (because the center of gravity of the triangle is H/3) I think the program uses a different formula here. If it is used to mean groundwater level, yes, then it will change the moment arm distance, but I could not see it in an area where we can enter information about YASS. I would appreciate if you could enlighten me. Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK
 
"batuhann2852":1vt2qu0l" said:
good day guys. I can't fix typical beam errors, I would appreciate your help. Idecad static 7 Demo version project is attached. Make it continuous by changing the starting distances of the ribs.You can also make typical tooth edits on the ribs with the Modify/Object Edit/Tile/Specify Typical Tooth command.
Click to expand...
 
"HakanŞahin":3bri9isi" said:
"batuhann2852":3bri9isi" said:
good day guys. I can't fix typical beam errors. Idecad static 7 Demo version project is attached.
Click to expand...
Hello. The teeth of the continuous ribs should be balanced to be continuous and the typical teeth should be selected continuously. Make it continuous by changing the starting distances of the continuous ribs. You can also make typical tooth arrangement on ribs with the Modify/Object Edit/Tile/Specify Typical Tooth command.
Click to expand...
is there a possibility to open and correct the attachment, I wonder if I've made any other mistakes, I always have question marks in my mind, maybe you can help me thanks in advance
 
Hi batuhann2852
"batuhann2852":27bystur" said:
by batuhann2852 » Oct 09, 2016, 12:53 can anyone help fix the attached project I can't fix ATTACHMENTS fethi torun.ide7 (3.77 MiB) downloaded 3 times
Click to expand...
My suggestion --this Watch all Reinforced Concrete trainings in the forum, --Get suggestions on how to make a project from experienced designers in your area, --These are; You reduced all the ground floor columns to one lower floor and did not examine the geometry control, you re-entered a rib slab in front of the rib (D42) of the 1st floor ceiling, I wrote it because you left the K14 beam, which should press from the column to the column, without supporting the K1669 and K100 beams.
 
"unver":1f64kccg" said:
Hi batuhann2852 My suggestion --Watch all the Reinforced Concrete trainings in this Forum, --Get suggestions on how to make a project from experienced designers in your area, --These are; you reduced all the ground floor columns to a lower floor and did not examine the geometry control. , I wrote you because you re-entered a rib slab in front of the rib (D42) of the 1st floor ceiling, and left the K14 beam, which should press from column to column, without supporting the K1669 and K100 beams. Take it easy. Ünver ÖZCAN
Click to expand...
thanks for your reply. K1669 And K100 beams separate the balcony in architecture, so I threw them away and I didn't fit the K14 beam, I fixed it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top