Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

I have asked it in another topic before, I think I asked it in the wrong place, I am adding my project here again. Experienced brothers, please keep their comments.
 
Output thickness of the objects in the drawings is adjusted with the ctb file. At the same time, if the thicknesses of the objects are the same as in the output, when we draw something in the same file later or add a drawing from another file, it will be easier to adjust both the drawings coming from the idea and the thickness of the drawing we have added. Thanks
 
Hello Easy. I have a question. There is too much pulling force in the bed direction in the system I have made. I determined and acted these pulling forces locally..(as point force) but the system does not use them in rollover control...it calculates rollover control based on only vertical non-vertical (M protecting).. and earthquake force (m overturning). however, shouldn't it also use the load combination that I have activated..?
 
Beam Nmax Problem? Hello, in my system consisting of B+Z+2 floors, the formwork plans on all floors are the same. Nmax problem occurs only in the elevator curtain with +120 cm upper elevation on the last floor of this system. There is no problem with this beam, which is connected to the same curtain on the lower floors. What is the reason of this?
 
Friends, what can we do to prevent reinforcement from piling up in the support areas? Is there something about the continuous basic settings?
 
"muhammetboztoprak":1lb97t4j" said:
hello, my cantilever beams coming out of the curtain behave like beams with support at both ends and do not calculate deflection.
Actually, according to the mold plan you added, there are no elements that we call console in the 3D mathematical model. K16 If we are talking about beams and K9 beams, both ends of those beams are supported, there is a cassette joint... The point to be considered here is whether the elements in question are equipped according to the moment diagram consisting of the most unfavorable loading condition.For this, by examining the moment diagram and whether the reinforcement made by the program is appropriate or not. However, if you still want K9 and K16 elements to be called consoles, you can select the elements as "left console" with the command Varies/Object Edit/Beam-base/Consoles.
 
"gokhan basut":uzaf6a8t" said:
no loading is visible when I open the 3D frame in the dome and vault analysis in the program. All elements are red(0) how can I solve it
Hello, After defining the dome supports, analysis and dome-vault analysis If done, the dome finite element results will be displayed in a 3D frame.
 
"HakanŞahin":319566y8" said:
"muhammetboztoprak":319566y8" said:
hello, my cantilever beams coming out of the curtain behave like beams with support at both ends and do not calculate deflection. what is the reason.
Actually, according to the mold plan you added, there are no elements that we call console in the 3D mathematical model. If we are talking about K16 and K9 beams, both ends of those beams are supported and there is a cassette joint... The point to be considered here is whether the elements in question are equipped according to the moment diagram consisting of the most unfavorable loading condition. For this, you examine the moment diagram and see if the reinforcement made by the program is appropriate. However, if you still want K9 and K16 elements to be called consoles, you can select the elements with the Variable/Object Edit/Beam-base/Consoles command and define them as "left console". k4 beam is not cantilever. Mi k4 behaves like this because there are nodal points at both ends of the curtain that I wonder.
 
"muhammetboztoprak":3e9u1t03" said:
"HakanŞahin":3e9u1t03" said:
"muhammetboztoprak":3e9u1t03" said:
hello, my cantilever beams coming out of the curtain behave like beams with two ends and do not calculate deflection. /quote] Actually, according to the formwork plan you added, there are no elements that we call cantilevers in the 3D mathematical model.If we are talking about K16 and K9 beams, both ends of those beams are supported, there is a cassette joint. whether it is equipped according to the moment diagram consisting of you can define it as "left console".
Hakan, I understand what you mean, but the picture I just added The k2 beam in the cantilever is cantilevered, while the k4 beam is not cantilever. I wonder if the k4 behaves like this because there are nodal points at both ends of the curtain.
Hello, The program does not call them "console" because the reinforcement does not cross the neighboring opening in the elements coming out of the panel, but if you examine the moment diagram and the reinforcement placement, you can see that those elements are also cantilever as you stated You can see its behavior.
 
Hello, I would like to get help on a subject. How is the calculation of the anchoring of the added wall to the columns and beams in a reinforcement project? For example, can we use 8Q20 = 25.13 by converting the wall horizontal reinforcement area (For example 2X16Q10=25.13) to the selected anchor in the anchorage of the added wall to the column? Thank you from now.
 
"celikus":k838h9sc" said:
Can we learn the total weight of the building including the foundation from the program?
The floor weights are printed as G+n*Q (including the foundation on the lowest floor) in the tipping moment control report. G and Q values on each floor (not including the foundation on the bottom floor) are printed.
 
"Levent Özpak":1l0vm5rf" said:
"celikus":1l0vm5rf" said:
Can we learn the total weight of the building including the foundation from the program?
In the tipping moment control report, the floor weights are G+n*Q (at the bottom floor) including the base). In the Floor General Information report, the G and Q values on each floor (not including the foundation on the bottom floor) are printed.
Thank you, Mr. Levent.
 
Hello Mr. Muhendis38 It depends on the situation, but; my preference is to solve the entire building together with the LADDER, that is, to use the SEMI-RIGGED DIAPHRAGM analysis model. Take it easy Unver ÖZCAN
 
Hello there. I have idestatic version 7.022. I had a problem with this version and previous ones and it still continues. two beams on top of each other on the same floor, one intermediate landing beam and one floor floor beam. When naming is made from the lower floor, these beams can take different names on the upper floors. While this creates an error, even if we correct the names manually, the name and level errors of these overlapping beams are still seen in the beam expansions. Is there a fix for this.
 
Back
Top