Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

have a nice day. While drawing the project, we are constantly faced with a fundamental problem. In the attached project, the TK9 beam, which is one of the continuous foundations, does not appear either in the reinforced concrete list or in the beam expansions after the analysis. This happens even though it is connected at the nodes. What could be the cause of this trouble? We request your urgent help. (beam dimensions are entered below)
 
As I understand, there is a decision problem in the program continuity drawing calculation. In the general reinforced concrete settings dialog, there is an option "Always accept beams whose angle difference is less than 15 degrees". I guess TK10 and TK13 beam have the same angle with respect to TK8 beam. Here, the program chose the TK8-TK13-TK14 continuity for continuity but not the TK8-TK9-TK14 continuity. Here, when "the angle difference between them is zero degrees", continuous beams are drawn piece by piece and TK9 beams are also drawn. Friends from IdeYAPI will evaluate it in more detail.
 
Hello Mr. Hakan; I can't see the Screen ratio control in the report section of the project. What could be the cause of the problem?
 
"majesty":n77v568e" said:
Hi Hakan; I can't see the Curtain ratio control in the report section of the project.. what could be the cause of the problem.
Hello, In the optional reports", under "Earthquake Reports", tick the "Screen Ratio Control" option .
 
In the reinforcement window of the continuous foundation that I put under the curtain, "Right.Front." I'm getting the message. If the building is at the parcel boundary and I do not have the option to console the foundation, how can I overcome this problem? Curtains 25cm, one-floor height, three U-shaped pieces, continuous base width 50, depth 100, base width 100 or 120. Sorry if it's been asked before, I searched but couldn't find it.
 
"civic":33qk8gcc" said:
I get the message "Right.O" in the reinforcement window of the continuous foundation I put under the curtain. How can I overcome this problem if the building is at the parcel boundary and I do not have the option to console the foundation? Curtains are 25 cm, one floor high, U three pieces in the form of continuous foundation width 50, depth 100, base width 100 or 120. Sorry if asked before, I searched, I could not find it.
In continuous foundations, the console is formed only if the element is defined with one end free, and if it is not supported on any column or panel. If you add, we can take a closer look.
 
"HakanŞahin":12wtr12f" said:
"civic":12wtr12f" said:
In the reinforcement window of the continuous foundation I put under the curtain, "Right. I'm getting the message. If the building is at the parcel boundary and I do not have the option to console the foundation, how can I overcome this problem? Curtains 25cm, single storey high, U-shaped three pieces, continuous foundation width 50, depth 100, floor width 100 or 120. Sorry if asked before, I searched, I couldn't find it. occurs if it is not supported on any column or panel. If you add the project, we can look at it in more detail.
I'm adding it. Thank you.
 
"civic":2mn1jr3r" said:
"HakanŞahin":2mn1jr3r" said:
"civic":2mn1jr3r" said:
I get a "Right Hand" message in the reinforcement window of the continuous foundation I put under the curtain. And if I don't have the option to make a cantilever to the foundation, how can I overcome this problem?The curtains are 25cm, one-floor height, three U-shaped pieces, continuous foundation width 50, depth 100, floor width 100 or 120. Sorry if it's been asked before, I searched, I couldn't find it.[/ quote] In continuous foundations, the console is formed only if the element is defined with one end free, and it is not supported on any column or panel. If you add the project, we can look at it in more detail.
I add. Thank you.
Joint points of continuous foundations, joint points of panels as corrected in the attached project (TK20 and TK24 should be defined from the top and bottom, respectively.)
 
I am dealing with a project with bored piles. I could not find the values such as vertical spring factor, adhesion factor, undrained shear resistance required for bored piles in the soil survey report, where can I find them?
 
Multiple selections can be made by opening a window in the "Give object settings" command. The program should save the changes made on the drawing, even if the analysis is done again after the drawings are finished, the dimension lines, reinforcements and texts on the slab should all be created in the changed place.
 
I am getting the error "Unable to determine the tile work pattern" while making a mesh-reinforced solution. Would you help me with this topic ?
 
"HakanŞahin":xc901u7c" said:
"nomask":xc901u7c" said:
Greetings, Can we look at the base shear force diagram under shears from the structure tree?
If the shear is defined as a bar element, the "Frame Results" in the relevant loading combination /With Shear Force 2-2 and Shear Force 3-3"; If the shear wall is modeled as a shell, you can see the shear force diagrams on the basis of finite elements in the "Compound shell results" in the combined load combination. In addition, the V2i and V3j values in the panel reinforced concrete at the relevant floor, and the total PT values are given numerically under the heading Shear Shear Force control in the earthquake regulation general report. Good work
Hello. I cannot access the effect values of the curtain from the structure tree. I only see the color diagrams of the screen in perspective. Is there a possibility to see the element results just like the beams and columns I want to see?
 
"ingegnere":3q1nxsg1" said:
I can't access the influence values of the curtain from the structure tree. I only see the color diagrams of the curtain in perspective. What I want to see is the possibility to see the element results, just like the beams and columns? for each finite element it is normal to see curtains modeled as rods can be viewed as you want
 
Good day, I have a question. I am trying to design a tribune and a disabled ramp for the conference hall. I tried to provide this by inclining the floor with the command to tilt the objects, but the vertical column gives continuity error. Do you have a solution suggestion? (only ground floor will have slope)
 
"ycel":34kgy336" said:
Good afternoon, I have a question, I'm trying to design a tribune and a disabled ramp for the conference hall, I tried to provide this by inclining the floor with the inclination of objects command, but the vertical column gives continuity error, do you have a solution? there will be slope on the floor )
Vertical continuity error in the column occurs when unconformity occurs in the column elevations.Each of the columns should continue along the structure from the top to the foundation without leaving any gaps.
 
Dear colleagues, I have a question, I wanted to consult you, is it appropriate to insert a 25x50 beam into a 40x36 horizontal beam. I wanted to ask because I do not find it logically appropriate. Waiting for your answers, have a nice day.
 
"antediluvian35":m1drg5h2" said:
Dear colleagues, I have a question, I wanted to consult you, is it appropriate to insert a 25x50 beam into a 40x36 horizontal beam. I wanted to ask because I do not find it logically appropriate. I am waiting for your answers, have a nice day.[/quote ] ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT...
 
In some software, when translated to dwg, dimensions are translated in a way that cad programs can understand as dimensioning. In Ide, when we turn it, the dimensions are line rounded and in the form of text. In ide, we expect the dimensions to remain in dwg in the dimensioning format, we want, greetings
 
Back
Top