Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[HakanŞahin]

can we define the joints of columns and beams ourselves ?

in the static model of the building Is this combination correct so that there is no problem, after all, I did not connect the nodes of the static objects.(When I look from the 3d frame, there is no problem.)

The description in the 3rd picture is correct. You do not have to connect the beam at the node of the column. Just click the column.

 

[cüneytazak]

Hello. When I get a slab report after the analysis, it gives a shear safety error on some of my beams as project errors, but it does not give any other errors. When I look at the optional reports section, the unenclosed column error is also added to these errors. Is it possible to give an unconfined column error tiling report among the project errors? good work... C.AZAK İnş. Eng.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Hello. After the analysis, when I get a slab report, it gives a shear safety error on some of my beams as project errors, but it does not give any other errors. When I look at the optional reports, the unconfined column error is added to these errors. unconfined column error slab report Good work... C.AZAK Civil Eng.

Hello, The expression unconfined column is not an error, it indicates a situation in the shear safety control of the column beam junction area, but to clear up any possible misunderstanding. : If the B errors in the reinforced concrete dialog, which you have expressed as unconfined column, mean that the relevant columns do not provide the shear safety of the column-beam junction (And>Vmax) Problem B is not shown as an error message when receiving the report according to the request from the users, but is printed as a red cross in the report.

 

[cüneytazak]

Thanks for your answer, Mr. Hakan... I think it would be better if errors related to the shear safety of the column beam junction area were shown on the Errors detected in the project page. Better to at least see all the errors at once. Can you tell me the reason why other users want to see it as an error message when receiving a report? Does it create complexity? take it easy... C. AZAK İnş. Eng.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Is

creating complexity?

This decision was taken due to intense requests from our users who want to take initiative. I guess there are those who want to ignore one or two combination checks depending on the situation. What you need to do is before getting a report checking status B in reinforced concrete dialog. With filter, you can check B in one go.

 

[cüneytazak]

Thank you very much, Mr. Khan.

 

[civilengineer.v]

I'm trying to get familiar with idecade with the demo program, looking at the file in the link and waiting for my mistakes and suggestions.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

thanks.

 

[izmirlimuhendis]

How can we calculate and draw the foundation beams in the project separately, not continuously?

 

[izmirlimuhendis]

How do we cancel the railings when drawing stairs? ?

 

[sahinsukru]

how can we remove the railings while drawing stairs. ?

There is a very practical way to get answers to these and similar questions. If you come to the relevant section of the program and press the "F1" key, the help menu will open. take it easy Sukru

 

[ingegnere]

Hello, 1. Can we do nonlinear inelastic analysis in İdecad 7? As far as I understand, it can only calculate according to linear elastic methods. It is done by the articles 7.5.1.1 and 7.5.1.2 in the regulation. If my building is higher than 25 meters, can I use performance analysis with mode combination method (linear elastic calculation)? Or should we use one of the linear inelastic calculation methods (incremental static pushover analysis). My second question is that in the performance analysis of the idecad 7.020 demo version, there are embrittlements due to the shear force of the curtains. In this case, even when I increase the amount of horizontal reinforcement, the report does not show any change. Is it because it's a demo? I was able to do this in the full version. Thanks in advance and good work everyone.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Hi, 1. Can we perform nonlinear inelastic analysis in İdecad 7? As far as I understand, it can only calculate according to linear elastic methods. According to the articles 7.5.1.1 and 7.5.1.2 of the regulation If my building is higher than 25 meters, can I use mode combination method (linear elastic calculation) and performance analysis?Or do I need to use one of the linear non-elastic calculation methods (incremental static pushover analysis-pushover).My second question is the performance analysis in idecad 7.020 demo version. There are embrittlements due to the shear force of the curtains in the analysis. In this case, even when I increase the amount of horizontal reinforcement, the report does not show any change. Is it because it is a demo? I was able to do this in the full version. Thanks in advance and good work to everyone.

Hello, *Performance of the existing structures in the program Evaluation can be done by Linear Elastic Calculation Method * As stated in Article 7.5 25 Calculation can be made according to the mode combination method in buildings higher than 1 meter. *There is no difference between the demo version and the licensed version, except for output restrictions. If the member capacity does not increase when the shear lateral reinforcement is increased, "Reinforcement corrosion" and "Insufficient clamping Length Yield stress factor" can be zero or close to zero in the Wall properties/Performance analysis tab. If you add the project, more detailed information can be given. Good work

 

[ingegnere]

Hi, 1. Can we do nonlinear inelastic analysis in İdecad 7? As far as I understand, it can only calculate according to linear elastic methods. It is done by the articles 7.5.1.1 and 7.5.1.2 in the regulation. If my building is higher than 25 meters, can I use performance analysis with mode combination method (linear elastic calculation)? Or should we use one of the linear inelastic calculation methods (incremental static pushover analysis). My second question is that in the performance analysis of the idecad 7.020 demo version, there are embrittlements due to the shear force of the curtains. In this case, even when I increase the amount of horizontal reinforcement, the report does not show any change. Is it because it's a demo? I was able to do this in the full version. Thanks in advance and good work to everyone.

Hello, *Performance evaluation of existing structures in the program can be done with the Linear Elastic Calculation Method. * As stated in Article 7.5, calculations can be made according to the mode combination method in buildings higher than 25 meters. *There is no difference between the demo version and the licensed version, except for output restrictions. If the member capacity does not increase when the shear lateral reinforcement is increased, "Reinforcement corrosion" and "Insufficient clamping Length Yield stress factor" can be zero or close to zero in the Wall properties/Performance analysis tab. If you add the project, more detailed information can be given. Good work

Hello, Yes, as you said, the values you mentioned in the properties of the curtains were zero or close to zero. Once I did these, the problem was solved. Thanks.

 

[Levent Özpak]

My foundation system is continuous foundation..After the analysis, Max. Soil stress values in Reinforced Concrete/Continuous foundation dialog show zero except for a few foundations. It may not have arrived and the foundation piece may have remained under the column object.If you add your project, we can examine the problem.

 

[cüneytazak]

Hello... As shown in the photo in the picture, the column is reinforced according to the combination of 0.9G+EX1/ÜST in the design part of the column design. but M3j(maj) and other values are larger in the line I marked, ie G+Q-EX2 COMBINATION. What is the reason for the combination of 0.9G+EX1/UPPER? It would be great if someone with knowledge could reply. thanks in advance... take it easy.. CÜNEYT AZAK INS. ENG.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Hello... as shown in the photo in the picture, the column is reinforced according to the combination of 0.9G+EX1/ÜST in the design part of the column design, but M3j(maj) and other values are in the line I marked, that is, in the G+Q-EX2 COMBINATION Bigger. ]http://www.idecadsupport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1085&p=8907&hilit=be%C4%9Fendim#p8897[/url] Good work

 

[cüneytazak]

Thank you for your answer, Mr. Levent, but all the values in the G+Q-EX2 combination are greater (more unfavorable) than all the values in the 0.9+EX1/UPPER combination. Not greater than either moment or normal force. all values are greater. Shouldn't the more unfavorable combination be taken in the design? Thank you in advance for your ideas and suggestions. Good luck with...

 

[Levent Özpak]

Levent, thank you for your answer but all values in G+Q-EX2 combination are greater (more unfavorable) than all values in 0.9+EX1/UPS combination. All values are larger. Shouldn't it be necessary to take the more unfavorable combination in the design? Thank you in advance for your ideas and suggestions. Take it easy...

Mr. Cüneyt, The reinforcement design is already done according to the most unfavorable situation. When the column capacity diagram is examined, it will be seen that when the normal force increases up to a certain value, the column capacity also increases and the need for reinforcement decreases.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Mr. Levent thank you for your answer but all values in G+Q-EX2 combination are greater (more unfavorable) than all values in 0.9+EX1/UPS combination. All values are larger. Shouldn't it be necessary to take the more unfavorable combination in the design? Thank you in advance for your ideas and suggestions. Take it easy...

Reinforcement calculations are made separately for all combinations. The combination that gives the most reinforcement area is unsuitable for that column. The reinforcement calculated for that combination will be the column reinforcement Add the project and let's see.

 

[cüneytazak]

Levent Bey and I.H. Thank you, Besler, for your answers. I'm using the demo, I loaded the project. there are no errors in the project but the combinations are stuck in my head. This project is like my other project. For example, I would be very happy if you share your suggestions for the s01 column G+Q-EX2 AND 0.9G+EX1 combinations on the 2nd floor. Why was the 0.9G+EX1 combination taken for the design but not the G+Q-EX2 combination? Thank you in advance for your interest and I wish you good work. Good luck with..