Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[epoxi]

but I know that there was a belief that the superstructure interactive solution on a continuous basis usually gives errors. I know that it is more appropriate to use superstructure interaction only for the raft foundation, respects

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

but I also know that there is a belief that superstructure interactive solution usually fails on a continuous basis. Except for the rafter raft flooring, the superstructure interactive solution can be made error-free and correctly.For the superstructure interactive solution, both continuous foundation and beamless raft systems can be used.Can you add an error-prone project.

 

[epoxi]

thanks for your comments. It is not accepted, so how would it be appropriate not to meet this requirement, good day from an engineer's perspective

Do I have any colleagues who can answer my question?

 

[NYILMAZ]

thanks for your comments. However, this warning is given in the geometry control in the program, but it is not considered as an error in the report. So how would it be appropriate not to meet this requirement, good day from an engineer's perspective

Do I have colleagues who can answer my question?

Does it make any sense to you? I do not know, but I will give an answer: The program does not give a negative warning in the output, although it warns some errors. For example, you can also make columns 20/20. Analyze and see, it does not give an error in the output. But it warns you in geometry control. You can think of it as "are you sure you do". For example, you may be doing performance analysis or risky construction. Allows data entry but warns you on entry. Yet another example, you can insert a column at the end of the cantilever beam.

 

[gunner]

Hello. I have a project with elliptical form. I tried to enter the foundation in line with this form, but I cannot use the floor line as a curve while it is on the architectural plan. Same problem with curtains. I can't make curved curtains directly. I thought I got rid of this problem by using the 'convert to panel' command by drawing an arc, but when I look at the panel details, the drawings are all intertwined. Since it is a dormitory project, I took the building importance coefficient of 1.4 and the live load participation coefficient of 0.6 on each floor. The sections have grown considerably. I haven't fixed the warnings in the geometry control yet. This is the project link:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Thank you in advance for your help and suggestions. In addition (especially on the foundation), I divided the large ribbed floors above the floor plan into two pieces with a transverse tooth. only because the load on the transverse thread is too much, I made the width 30 cm and made the reinforcement 14. Are there maximum values limiting the cross section and reinforcement of the distribution thread? I couldn't find it on ts 500.

 

[Levent Özpak]

hello. I have a project with an elliptical form. I tried to enter the foundation in line with this form, but I can't use the tiling line as curved. While on the architectural plan, the same problem exists on curtains. I can't make curved curtains directly. bow I thought I got rid of this problem by using the 'convert to panel' command by drawing it, but when I looked at the panel details, the drawings were all intertwined...

Hello, There is no possibility to define curvilinear curtains as a single piece in the program. You can edit the detail drawings using 2D possibilities. , you can use the tile edge command to create split panels using the joint points.

 

[epoxi]

Thanks for your comments. He says it cannot be more than 10. But in the program, this warning is given only in the geometry control, but it is not considered as an error in the report, so how would it be appropriate not to meet this requirement, good day from an engineer's perspective

Do I have colleagues who can answer my question?

I don't know if it makes sense to you, but I'll give you an answer: Although the program warns some errors, it does not give a negative warning in the output. For example, you can make the columns 20/20. Analyze and see, it will not give any errors in the output. But it warns you in the geometry control. You can think of it as "are you sure you do"[/b]. For example, you may be doing performance analysis or risky construction. It allows data entry but warns you on entry. Yet another example cantilever beam You can enter a colon at the end of the n. Shouldn't he also consider the economy?

 

[yavuzburak]

Hello, I am a final year civil engineering student. I have an assignment I'm trying to do right now. I entered the elements of the project, only basic and analysis remained. However, I couldn't quite do it. Is there anyone who can help with this?

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Project link is above. Project information: Z3, Ground=2.0 kgf/cm2, K=2470 tf/m3, I=0, Ao=0.20, Rx=5.8 Ry=5.6

 

[izmirlimuhendis]

When opening the file, it gives a "file corrupted CRC Check" warning. Is there any way to save it? file link

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[Levent Özpak]

it gives a "file corrupted CRC Check" warning when opening the file I wonder is there a way to recover the file link

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Hello, Unfortunately, your project file cannot be recovered.

 

[izmirlimuhendis]

For example, in reinforcement projects, there are 50 beams on the floor and if 10 of them are equipped with x-ray and other methods, how do we determine the reinforcement of the other 40? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[sahinsukru]

For example, in retrofit projects, there are 50 beams on the floor and if 10 of them are equipped with x-ray and other methods, how do we determine the reinforcement of the other 40. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Buildings to be built in earthquake zones Chapter 7 of the regulation is devoted to the evaluation and strengthening of existing buildings. Article 7.2 of this chapter explains how to collect information from buildings. I wish you a good work. Şükrü Şahin İnş.eng.

 

[NYILMAZ]

Shell concrete stripping should be done on the beams and reinforcement should be determined in this way. This amount should not be less than 10% of the beams at the intermediate knowledge level. Then the other beams will be multiplied by the reinforcement realization coefficient. If there is no project at hand, the building is analyzed in such a way that the minimum reinforcements are thrown to the beams without earthquakes and minimum reinforcement is added to all beams. Then in the performance analysis, the beam reinforcements are fixed and the calculation is made. It is necessary to check whether the reinforcements examined here are also below the minimum reinforcement.

 

[sereze]

It would be better if the live load participation coefficient is taken to the analysis settings menu. In addition, if it is included in the more general summary structure report section in the report, it will be more common and the possibility of making mistakes will be reduced. I wish everyone good work.

 

[sereze]

Is the earthquake code article 2.7.2.4 (c) applied? If applicable, how can we find the relevant results in the report?

 

[sereze]

According to article 2.8.5, where can we see whether the beta is 0.8 or 0.9? Any chance of entering the beta ourselves?

 

[HakanŞahin]

Where can we see whether the beta was 0.8 or 0.9 according to item 2.8.5? Do we have a chance to enter the beta ourselves?

Beta coefficient, dynamic analysis report, "dynamic analysis login information" You can see it in the "earthquake parameters" table in the report.

 

[civilengineer.v]

Can we define the nodal points of columns and beams ourselves?

 

[HakanŞahin]

can we define the joint points of columns and beams ourselves?

When you define beam or column, joint points are created automatically. If you write the purpose of asking the question, we can write a more accurate answer for the situation you want to do.

 

[civilengineer.v]

can we define the joint points of columns and beams ourselves?

When you define beam or column, joint points are created automatically. If you write the purpose of asking the question, we can write a more accurate answer for the situation you want to do.

First of all, let me state that I am a demo user.

let's say we have two columns like in the picture, when I define beams for them, even if I change the offset, I can't get the image I want

from the axis intersection, the problem disappears.

Is this combination correct so that there is no problem in the static model of the structure. After all, I did not connect the nodes of the static objects.