Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[yagmurcankocak]

Good day, I am sharing an attached work of mine. I modeled the load calculations and reinforcement quantities of a building outside in idecad and entered the reinforcements. Here, I will have the flooring calculation and drawings done. My question is; It gives a "double reinforcement" error in the flooring element D38 on the flooring on the +0.00 ceiling (+5.00 level). When I ran the tile analysis, I noticed that the tile boundaries were created incorrectly. No matter how hard I tried to fix it (erased, redrawn etc). I wonder where this problem came from (where could I have made a mistake in the beginning) and how can I solve it? Thanks in advance for your help. Note: Since the model is 4.38 MB, I could not add it here, you can download it for free from the link below.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[saridurmus]

Hi Yağmur Bey, change the reinforcement placement on the D38 slab, make flat reinforcement on the top+bottom, the error will be fixed.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Good afternoon, I am sharing an attached work of mine. I modeled the load calculations and reinforcement quantities for a building outside in idecad and entered its reinforcements. Here, I will have the floor calculation and drawings done. My question is, on the floor on the +0.00 ceiling. (+5.00 level) It gives a "double reinforcement" error in the slab element D38. When I ran the slab analysis, I noticed that the slab boundaries were created incorrectly. No matter how hard I tried to fix it, it did not work (I erased it, I drew it again, etc.). ) and how can I solve it? Thanks in advance for your help. Note: the model is 4.38 MB so I couldn't add it here, you can download it for free from the link below.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Hi, Tile The problem in your analysis is caused by the D34 tile. Re-defining the tile solves the problem. Also, the contours of the D05-D14-D26 tiles are wrong. the tiling gap is defined. Good work

 

[izmirlimuhendis]

Everything is fine, but if we can convert these quantities to excel format or if they stay intact when exported to excel. It seems to me that the world will become a more beautiful, more livable place.

 

[izmirlimuhendis]

There is a strangeness in continuous foundation beam expansions. The lengths of the expansions containing TKZ14-13-12-11-10-9-8 are written incorrectly. The lengths of the beams after TKZ12 are given differently. It also gives the wrong axle spacing.

 

[ilkerabbas]

there is a strangeness in continuous foundation beam expansions. The lengths of the expansions containing TKZ14-13-12-11-10-9-8 are written incorrectly. it also gives wrong.

 

[izmirlimuhendis]

Mr. İlkerabbas, I did not fully understand what you want to do. Why did you put columns between the curtains and send the project back?

there is a strangeness in continuous foundation beam expansions. The lengths of the expansions containing TKZ14-13-12-11-10-9-8 are written incorrectly. The lengths of the beams after TKZ12 are given differently. it also gives wrong axis spacing.

 

[HakanŞahin]

There is a strangeness in continuous foundation beam expansions. The lengths of the expansions containing TKZ14-13-12-11-10-9-8 are written incorrectly. The lengths of the beams after TKZ12 are given differently. It also gives wrong.

There are panels on the façade along its 2 axis, but it is only divided by beams. The continuity of the foundations at the dividing points of the foundation supports is not evident. To overcome this, put a column as much as the support width at the points where you want a support. Take a drawing and then delete the columns. Also, in the dividing panels continuous bases must be entered by clicking on each dividing point.

 

[izmirlimuhendis]

I don't want to be arrogant, Mr. Hakan, but can't the curtains be divided by beams in the program... Do we need to put a column in between and delete it? Do you think this is the right solution? If this is the right solution, shouldn't this solution be described in this way in the program's user manuals (in the form of putting a column in between when dividing the curtains with a beam, then delete it)?

 

[HakanŞahin]

Hakan Bey, I don't want to be arrogant, but can't the curtains be divided by beams in the program... Do you need to put a column in between and delete it. Do you think this is the right solution? If this is the right solution, it is in the program manuals Shouldn't it be described in this way (as when dividing the curtains with beams, put a column between them and then delete them)?

Hello, This situation is not related to analysis. There is no mathematical problem. It's about being able to constantly arrange the foundation drawing as you want. It's a specific situation. Taken in our project notes. Good work

 

[majesty]

Good day, as you can see in detail in the attached picture, when I place 50fi20 Rebar in a 60/40 cross-section, I do not receive any warning. shouldn't you... :?? I wish you a good day...

 

[HakanŞahin]

Good day As you can see in detail in the attached picture, when I place 50fi20 Rebar in a 60/40 cross section, I do not receive any warning. we know, but shouldn't I at least get a maximum price warning for 50fi20...?

Hello, if this reinforcement is calculated as a result of the analysis, the program will give a maximum price warning.

 

[majesty]

Good day As you can see in detail in the attached picture, when I place 50fi20 Rebar in a 60/40 cross section, I do not receive any warning. .. We know that in ide 7, the reinforcement does not give a warning that does not fit into the cross-section, but for 50fi20, at least, shouldn't I get a maximum price warning...?

Hello, if this reinforcement was calculated as a result of the analysis, the program would give a maximum price warning. The program does not give a warning because you changed the accessories yourself.

Hello Mr. Hakan; We are getting maximum pursajtaj error in manual reinforcement corrections for Klolon, but..(although the program does not insert it) ...... I think it will be healthy if you add this to your notes together with the reinforcement that does not fit into the section in the next version.... I wish you a good work..

 

[yagmurcankocak]

Good day, Attached project shows reinforcement problem in some tiles. However, no matter how much I increase the reinforcement on the floors, the reinforcement area does not increase in the calculations. Am I missing something?

 

[HakanŞahin]

Good afternoon, Some slabs show reinforcement problem in the attached project. But no matter how much I increase the reinforcement on the slabs, the reinforcement area does not increase in the calculations. Am I missing something?

Hello, Features some small span console In slabs, selection cannot be made because the "Make reinforcement spacings multiples of 5" option is selected in the slab parameters. If you deselect the option, the missing hang messages will be removed. If you want the slab reinforcement spacings to be multiples of 5, you can edit the slab reinforced concrete yourself. Good work

 

[epoxi]

Whatever I did, I couldn't save the curtains with 25 cm thickness, but a friend of mine saved them. I wonder if there is a problem with the curtain settings, should we not design them as a shell?

 

[NYILMAZ]

whatever I did, I could not save the curtains with a thickness of 25 cm, but a friend of mine saved them. I wonder if there is a problem with the curtain settings, can we not design it as a shell

What is your project, what kind of structure are we talking about. Didn't we know that you sent a project, but the dimensions of the curtains also vary depending on the storey height. For example, the thickness of the curtain depends on the storey height. (DBYBHY 3.6.1.1)[/b][/u] Again DBYBHY 3.6.2.1 ........ the wall thickness at the end of the wall is 1/15 of the floor height ...... less cannot says.

 

[epoxi]

whatever I did, I couldn't save the curtains with 25 cm thickness, but a friend of mine saved them. I wonder if there is a problem with the curtain settings, can we not design it as a shell

What is your project? What kind of structure are we talking about? We don't know if you have sent a project before. The dimensions of the curtains also vary depending on the floor height. For example, depending on the storey height .... wall thickness in the body area cannot be less than 1/20 of the height ...... (DBYBHY 3.6.1.1) Again [ u]DBYBHY 3.6.2.1 ........ the thickness of the wall at the end of the wall cannot be less than 1/15 ...... of the floor height[/u] it says to my message.

Thank you for your answer, I checked the geometry before the analysis in my project and there was no problem. Only the height of the basement is 3.5 m, the other floors are 3 m and the building is a 5-storey project including the ground. The building is a normal apartment project (first of all, I modeled the curtains) as a shell. The section that did not save much came out. When I modeled it without shell, I saw that many curtains saved it, I wonder what kind of difference there is between the two.

 

[gunner]

good day, how can I find out where the values I circled based on what I have done come from? where do i need to check from report or 3d frame? this is the project link:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[proisa]

good day, how can I find out where the values I circled based on what I have done come from? where do I need to check in the report or 3d frame? this is the project link:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Fixed and floating in the general settings tab when you open the properties of the raft tile There are load lines, where the G value = basic self-weight+given fixed load Q value shows the entered live load.