Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

Free dimensioning What is the solution for free dimensioning to have the total dimension length at the top, but at the bottom as in the appendix?
 
Re: Free dimensioning
"illaga":2kai85wq" said:
What is the solution for the total measurement length to be at the top in free dimensioning, but at the bottom as in the appendix?
Click to expand...
The measurement may not be given at exactly zero degree (horizontal) There may have been some angle shift.
 
Re: Free dimensioning
"HakanŞahin":32q2ccge" said:
"illaga":32q2ccge" said:
What is the solution for the total dimension length to be at the bottom as in the appendix in free dimensioning?[/quote ] The measurement may not be given at exactly zero degree (horizontal). Some angle shift may have occurred.
Click to expand...
Hakan, although the vertical command is active, sometimes such an error occurs..
Click to expand...
 
Re: Free dimensioning
"illaga":1udb58eu" said:
"HakanŞahin":1udb58eu" said:
"illaga":1udb58eu" said:
In free dimensioning, the total dimension length should be at the top. What is the solution for it to be at the bottom like that?
Click to expand...
The measurement may not be given at exactly zero degree (horizontal). There may be some angle shift.
Click to expand...
Hakan, although the vertical command is active, sometimes such an error occurs..[/ quote] If you add an example where we can do what you wrote, we can have a look.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Free dimensioning
"illaga":saczwo3t" said:
"HakanŞahin":saczwo3t" said:
"illaga":saczwo3t" said:
In free dimensioning, the total dimension length should be at the top. What is the solution for it to be at the bottom like that?
Click to expand...
The measurement may not be given at exactly zero degree (horizontal). There may be some angle shift.
Click to expand...
Hakan, although the vertical command is active, sometimes such an error occurs..[/ quote] Hello After clicking the points to be dimensioned, while drawing the line where the dimension line will be drawn, the dimension direction and total writing direction change depending on whether you draw above or below the points.
Click to expand...
 
Will the Demo version of Version 7.022 be released? Controls sometimes take the data file and examine it. I save and send it as version 7.018, but after re-analysis, it is said that there are problems (such as lack of reinforcement in the beams) that are not in the new version.
 
"proisa":1jeqdqms" said:
Will there be a Demo version of version 7.022? Controls sometimes take the data file and examine it. I save it as version 7.018 and send it, but after re-analysis, it is said that there are problems that are not in the new version (such as lack of reinforcement in beams).[/quote ]
"HakanŞahin":1jeqdqms" said:
"proisa":1jeqdqms" said:
I save and send it as version 7.018, but after reanalysis, it is said that there are problems (such as lack of reinforcement in beams) that are not in the new version.
Click to expand...
Hello, This is Can you add a project you are experiencing to the forum or you can send it to [email protected] Hello again, Account differences are within the limit values and are expected differences. .ideCAD Statik 7.022 Demo program has been prepared upon your request, you can download it from the link below:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Good work
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
"HakanŞahin":2bk18b8b" said:
"proisa":2bk18b8b" said:
Will there be a Demo version of Version 7.022? Controls sometimes take the data file and examine it. I save and send it as version 7.018, but after re-analysis, it is said that there are problems (such as lack of reinforcement in the beams) that are not in the new version.
Click to expand...
"HakanŞahin":2bk18b8b" said:
"proisa":2bk18b8b" said:
save as version 7.018 I'm sending it, but after re-analysis, it is said that there are problems (such as lack of reinforcement in the beams) that are not in the new version. Or you can send it to [email protected].
Click to expand...
Hello again, Account differences are within the limit values and are expected differences. ideCAD Statik 7.022 Demo program has been prepared upon your request, you can download it from the link below:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Good work
Click to expand...
Thanks for your attention I know a debt... Good work...
Click to expand...
 
I hadn't done a risky building assessment for a long time. Have the "maximum story drift" checks been removed in 7.022? (3.5.3. Risk assessment will be made for the critical floor. In addition, if the largest story drift ratio calculated as a result of the analysis is occurring on another floor, only the floor drift limit values will be checked for this floor. It will be considered as a building.)
 
"mhanifiata":2swc8fr0" said:
I haven't been doing a risky building assessment for a long time. Have the "maximum story drift" checks been removed in 7.022? (3.5.3. Risk assessment will be made for the critical floor. Also, the largest story calculated as a result of the analysis made) If the drift ratio occurs on another floor, only the floor drift limit values will be checked for this floor. If any floor is found to be risky, the building will be considered as a Risky Building.)
Click to expand...
No Not Removed. Evaluation of the Building According to the Regulation on Determination of Risky Buildings It is printed in the section.
 
Is there an easy way to get each drawing of the system, which consists of 6 blocks with vertical and horizontal dilatation, block by block? The arrangement of the axle system is tiring. Especially the mold and column application plan :s
 
Good afternoon, in Beam Expansions.... We don't have a chance to get cross-sections in Bearings apart from the opening..( :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top