First of all, hollow floor systems can also be solved according to the assumption of a fully rigid diaphragm.In the case of cork floors, if a solution is made according to the assumption of a fully rigid diaphragm, since the floors are not included in the analysis model, problems such as relative floor drift etc. may be encountered."illaga":3avmeopb" said:If we are solving the system in a hollow, cork, etc., you say that analysis should be made according to the "Semi-rigid diaphragm" assumption.
"matrax":jm9b58uo" said:I drew a project from scratch, made a reinforced concrete analysis, there was no error in the static report.. I said, let me do a risky building analysis, it was detected as a risky building, why might it be caused[ /quote] Add the project...
According to the table you added, line 1 is Slab+table, total height is d= 15+26-3 =38 cm Row 2 is for slab only, d=26-3=23 cm. Column Since the header will be under the slab, the level value you have given is correct... Although the program is negative since it is a table, there is no need to consider the verification made for slab."illaga":3ni1pi6g" said:How can we read the effect of the column cap on the un-beamed slab in the attached table? Column cap as table height=15 cm, floor margin=3 cm, slab thickness=26 cm, column head elevation=-26 cm Is this correct?
Since the expression "Column Cap-Column-Table" might be wrong in the line that looks negative, we asked this question. I felt the need to ask. Some designers are designing the table to stay inside the floor, can we say that this is not true? And in the beamless slab, isn't the stapling verification done without placing the column head? Thanks.."HakanŞahin":1iqxejch" said:According to the table you added, line 1 is Slab+screed, total height is d= 15+26-3 =38 cm, row 2 is for slab only, d=26-3=23 cm. Since the column header will be under the slab, the elevation value you have given is correct... Although the program gives a negative result because it is a table, there is no need to consider the verification made for the slab."illaga":1iqxejch" said:How can we read the effect of the column header in the un-beamed slab in the attached table? I entered the column head as table height=15 cm, floor space=3 cm, slab thickness=26 cm, column head elevation=-26 cm. Is this correct?
It is among our case notes for line 2."illaga":umhpqca7" said:I felt the need to ask this question because the expression "Column Header-Column-Tray" might be wrong in the line that seems negative.
The important thing is to be able to provide the useful height and stapling circumference value based on the stapling calculation... If these can be provided, we cannot say that what you wrote is wrong. ideCAD Static, on the other hand, performs stapling verification according to the figures (11.3 and 11.4) and explanations in the TS500."illaga": umhpqca7" said:Some of the designers are designing the table to stay inside the floor, can we say that this is not true?
Yes, it can be done. Useful height is taken as slab height-concrete cover."illaga":umhpqca7" said:And in non-beam slabs, isn't the stapling verification done without placing the column cap? Thanks..
We do not have such an e-mail address. Our e-mail address is [email protected][/ e-mail]"matrax":3o84ix8k" said:[email protected] to this address
Experienced friends can help if you add your project..."antediluvian35":1slbluzq" said:Forum admins no answer?
I have added my project, my colleagues who will reply already thank you"proisa":1xfa54ix" said:If you add your project, experienced friends can help..."antediluvian35":1xfa54ix" said:Forum admins no answer?
Thank you, Mr. Levent. However, my question is more than whether there is an error in data entry, is there a regulation that you know, that does not allow hollow stair landings? ."Levent Özpak":v6924yjv" said:Your project does not seem to have a problem in terms of data entry.
"antediluvian35":3abxbybh" said:It may not be a problem to make the stair landing hollow, but how do you plan to support the staircase to the 7cm thick floor? After that, you need to consider the rule that the beam height cannot be less than 3 times the floor height."proisa":3abxbybh" said:Experienced friends can help if you add your project...[[ /quote] I have attached my project, thank you in advance to my colleagues who will reply"antediluvian35":3abxbybh" said:Forum admins no answer ?
Hello, Answer to your question It is available at the following link:"yilmazozaktan":2d4zygg7" said:Greetings, Idecad 7.018 increases the ductility level to 4 in both directions, why can't I get ductility level 4 even though there is one curtain in 7.020 and 7.022. This is not a problem in program updates. Or in 7.018 and Are our older projects faulty. The municipality and building inspections found it a bit strange that the ductility level of the building, which has one shear in the Konya 4th region earthquake zone, was found a bit strange. I also restored the 7.018 program. I would appreciate it if you examine it. It's easy.
German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish