Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[HakanŞahin]

Re: Ladder detail

Idecad does not create detailed staircase details. Will we solve this with our own engineering skills. Best regards..

Hello, The program is straight-armed creates the detailed staircase detail of the stairs. In the attached video, you can watch how the program creates the staircase detail.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[illaga]

Re: Stair detail

Idecad does not create detailed staircase details. Are we going to solve this with our own engineering skills? Best regards..

Hello, The program creates the detailed staircase detail of straight arm stairs. In the attached video, you can watch how the program creates the staircase detail.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Thank you sir.

 

[proisa]

After analyzing the program, I have to wait 10-15 seconds to get any report. I expect even in small 2-storey buildings, I expect more in larger buildings. When I open the projects made by others on my own computer, the reports appear instantly. I thought there was something wrong with my template file, so I created the file from scratch. Same thing happened again. In terms of analysis speed, the solution is parallel to the performance of my computer, but there is slowness in the interface, reports and drawings. I experienced this yesterday by using ide on another engineer friend's computer which is lower than my own as a configuration. The reports of the 5-storey building solved with a semi-rigid diaphragm are instantly displayed on the screen. When I copied the file to my own computer, it opened instantly for me. But in the projects I have created, I am waiting even if it is 2 floors. I'm adding my template project too...

 

[HakanŞahin]

After analyzing the program, I have to wait 10-15 seconds to get any report. I wait even in small 2-storey buildings, I wait more in larger buildings. When I open projects made by others on my own computer, the reports appear instantly I thought there was a problem in my template file, I created the file from the beginning. The same thing happened again. The solution is parallel with the performance of my computer in terms of analysis speed, but there is a slowness in the interface, reports and drawings. I experienced this yesterday by using ide on another engineer friend's computer, which is lower than my own as a configuration. The reports of the 5-storey building, solved with a semi-rigid diaphragm, are instantly displayed on the screen. When I copy the file to my own computer, it opens instantly for me. But I wait even if it is 2 floors in the projects I created myself. I also add my template project...

I created a small system in the template project you added. Waits of 10-15 seconds did not occur in the reports. It is difficult to offer specific solutions unless they occur in us. However, some suggestions can be made. For the slowness of getting a report; 1) Delete files and folders located under "C:\ProgramData\ideCAD" folder. 2) Reset the "registry" settings by opening the program with the ctrl + shift key. (Attention, your menu and toolbar settings are also classified. If you have customized them, you will need to do it again.) do graphics card updates. If not, we can look at your computer with remote access. Good work

 

[efsane]

If you are placing a logo in the logo box in the report section, it can also happen.

 

[efsane]

hello, how to get the a and b values in the beam loads section of the beam report. Can you help with an example. I have a problem with the values and it happens that a and b are 0. I thought they were in the places where the stairs were defined, but. It happens more than once. Thanks in advance for your help. good work.

 

[proisa]

if you place a logo in the logo box in the report section, it can be because of that....

Congratulations to you. The problem was caused by the logo... More precisely, the logo's large resolution... When you remove it, it opens instantly.. . Thanks

 

[efsane]

You are welcome. Yes, resolution is a problem. When you say trouble, you have to wait. I put my business card.

 

[gozde]

After analyzing my retrofit project, when I want to receive a retrofit report, the program hangs. When I stop receiving the report, the program says it stopped working and closes. I didn't understand why.

 

[HakanŞahin]

After analyzing my retrofit project, when I want to receive a retrofit report, the program hangs, when I stop receiving the report, the program says it stopped working and closes. I don't understand why.

Can you add the project?

 

[HakanŞahin]

hi, how to get the a and b values in the beam loads section of the beam report. Can you help with an example. I have a problem with the values and it happens that a and b are 0. I thought they were at the places where the stairs were defined before, but .it happens more than once. Thanks in advance for your help. Good work.

Hi, For load types 1 and 2; a is the distance from the starting point of the beam to the starting point of the load b, from the end point of the load The distance to the end of the beam a,b values for the 3rd load type gives the position of the peak of the load curve found from the slab finite elements on the beam. (Beam clear length is valid) 1st, 2nd and 3rd load types The explanation given at the top of the beam loads report is valid: Which type of load is used on which beam is given in column # of the report: As a result; 1. for load type a and b values appearing to be zero most of the time is normal. For example wall load etc. like loads that exist along the beam clear span...

 

[aykut_k]

Is it possible to turn a block drawing that I have autocadden into the program so that its height is in the z axis in order to see it in 3 dimensions? Likewise, is it possible to draw a line on the xz or yz axis, not the xy axis? If yes, how?

 

[nitasltd]

Hello. While I can receive any drawing in this dpsya, the program freezes in beam drawings.

 

[NYILMAZ]

Hi There, the program freezes in beam drawings, while it can import any drawing in this dpsya.

Check the geometry. There are errors there, first get rid of those errors (short beams etc.) You will not have any problems. Related errors in the attached file corrected. Please review in your own file. Good work.

 

[NYILMAZ]

Dear nitasltd, I also did not examine the other elements much. The first thing I saw, consider your base system again. Connect the beams from columns to columns.

 

[MEHMETSIRAY]

LEVENT BEY ELEVATOR CURTAIN BASED NORMAL DENIM APART. WHEN WE WANT TO DRAW CURTAIN DETAIL IN AN ELEVATOR SYSTEM WITH TWO-SIDED CURTAINS BECAUSE IT IS 120 CM DOWN, ORDINARY DISCONNECTED DRAWINGS OCCUR, AND WE HAVE TO CORRECT IT MANUALLY IS THERE A SOLUTION?

 

[Levent Özpak]

Hello Mehmet, If you add it to your project, we can examine the problem in more detail. Good work

 

[yagmurcankocak]

Good afternoon, There was a point in the attached project that I did not understand. I'll be happy if you can help me. 1. K320 beam, one of the floor beams, is extremely difficult for a reason I don't understand. As a result, I cannot ensure the joint point security and the reinforcement needed in the beam exceeds the maximum prusantage. I checked; - No extra load, only wall load available. - Right and left openings (for example) narrower or the same as for the K323 beam. - They are in the same position in terms of beam continuity. However, the moment on the K320 beam seems unreasonably high. Is there a point I missed? Good work.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Good afternoon, There was a point that I did not understand in the attached project. I would appreciate if you could help. 1. One of the floor beams, the K320 beam is extremely difficult for some reason that I do not understand. As a result, I cannot ensure both the joint point security and the need for the beam. reinforcement exceeds maximum prusantage I checked: - No extra load, only wall load present - Right and left openings (for example) are narrower or the same as in K323 beam - They are in the same position in terms of beam continuity However, the resulting moment seems unreasonably high. Is there anything I missed? Good work.

When we look at the load analysis of the K320 beam, it can be seen that the beam is getting a lot of load from D309 compared to other beams. Although I can't identify the cause of the problem, delete the D309 slab and try again There is no problem when you define it.

 

[yagmurcankocak]

Good day, I received the file you sent and there is no problem. But it is interesting that even though I deleted and redrawn the D309 (even later the K320 and D310) on my own model, the same problem is experienced. Even more interestingly, I deleted and redrawn D309 in your drawing, the same problem occurred. For now I will continue with the drawing you sent, but where could the problem be here? There is obviously a problem with the tiling settings (or maybe the static settings, I don't know) while drawing. Can you give an idea of where it is? Good work.