Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[Levent Özpak]

If we want to make a raft foundation under the curtain in a structure that is completely surrounded by curtains, it is necessary to create a flooring with the slab edge command. I would like to ask these questions..

It would be appropriate to go around the edges of the mat flooring from outside the curtains, otherwise the effects of the panels may not be taken into account on the raft.

 

[yagmurcankocak]

Good evening, I have prepared the drawings for the reinforcement project that I have prepared in the appendix. Then I started to prepare the footage. Since I only need concrete and reinforcement to be used for reinforcement, I cannot directly use the quantity given by the program. For this reason, I started to edit the data of the program by transferring it to excel. Let me ask my question with a specific example; Get a basement column application plan from the project, with reinforcement details. In those details, there is a kipper reinforcement number 163. It shows its weight and quantity (in the table below) in the same drawing. Now have a reinforcement quantity prepared (detailed quantity in the report menu). I could not see this cross-ties in the quantity created from the report section (in the section created for the columns). In fact, no pose after pose 125 is included in this footage. Am I forgetting to look somewhere? Because it doesn't make much sense that the program does not see the pose that it sees in the drawing, in the reporting. Good work.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Good evening, I prepared the drawings for the reinforcement project I prepared in the appendix. Then I started to prepare the quantity. Since I only need the concrete and reinforcement to be used in reinforcement, I cannot directly use the quantity given by the program. Therefore, I can not directly use the program data to excel. Let me ask my question with a specific example; Get a basement floor column application plan from the project, with reinforcement details. There is a tie rod reinforcement number 163 in those details. In the same drawing, it shows its weight and quantity (in the table below). Now have a reinforcement quantity prepared (with in the report menu, detailed quantity.) I couldn't see this cross-tie in the footage created from the report section (in the section created for the columns). In fact, no pose after pose 125 is included in this footage. Do I forget to look somewhere? Because the pose that the program sees its meter in the drawing is not displayed in the report. It doesn't make much sense if he doesn't see it. Good work.]

Hello, The reinforcement quantity of the pose you mentioned in the drawings is also visible in the reports. However, the number of poses is different. For example, the size of the cross-ties reinforcement belonging to pose 163 in the drawing is shown in the report in pose 125. The reason why the poses are different; preparation of global quantity in drawings on element basis at the moment in the program.... Good work

 

[yagmurcankocak]

Good evening, I prepared the drawings for the reinforcement project I prepared in the appendix. Then I started to prepare the footage. Since I only need concrete and reinforcement to be used for reinforcement, I cannot directly use the quantity given by the program. For this reason, I started to edit the data of the program by transferring it to excel. Let me ask my question with a specific example; Get a basement column application plan from the project, with reinforcement details. In those details, there is a kipper reinforcement number 163. It shows its weight and quantity (in the table below) in the same drawing. Now have a reinforcement quantity prepared (detailed quantity in the report menu). I could not see this cross-ties in the quantity created from the report section (in the section created for the columns). In fact, no pose after pose 125 is included in this footage. Am I forgetting to look somewhere? Because it doesn't make much sense that the program does not see the pose that it sees in the drawing, in the reporting. Good work.]

Hello, the reinforcement size of the pose you mentioned in the drawings is also visible in the reports. However, the number of poses is different. For example, the size of the cross-ties reinforcement belonging to pose 163 in the drawing is shown in the report in pose 125. The reason why the poses are different; Currently, the program is preparing global quantity in drawings on the basis of elements.... Good work

Mr. Levent, good day again, I removed the "Globally pose the reinforcement" option and recreated the drawings. In this case, the kippers, which are actually the same on all 3 floors, received completely different names (Bodrum:156 Z. floor: 15 1. floor: 13). But in this case, the reinforcement with item number 125 in the quantity (kiroz) is not visible in the drawings. Besides, isn't the reason why we say "expose the reinforcement globally" in the drawing, so that if the elements on different floors are the same, they get the same name (ie, the crossties with the same shape (in this example) on the basement floor on the 1st floor have the same pose number)? Or, without deceiving you too much, without tiring you too much, let me shorten my question. How can I find the equivalents of the reinforcements we see in the drawings in the quantity (if there is such a mismatch in the item numbers) (In this example, how can I find that the reinforcement item number 163 corresponds to the item number 125 item in the meterial, for example)? Also, if the entire drawing already has 125 exposures of iron total, isn't that what "expose reinforcement globally" means? Why are the "global poses" in the drawings and the "global poses" in the footage different? Good work

 

[Levent Özpak]

Good day, Mr. Levent, I removed the "Global exposure of reinforcement" option and recreated the drawings. In this case, the kiosks, which are actually the same on all 3 floors, received completely different names (Bodrum: 156 Z. floor: 15 1st floor: 13. But in this case, the reinforcement (cross-ties) with item number 125 does not appear in the drawings. Besides, the reason why we say "expose the reinforcement globally" in the drawing is not so that if the elements on different floors are the same, they get the same name (i.e. 1. Let the kiosks with the same shape (in this example) have the same pose number on the floor and basement floor. (In this example, for example, how can I find that the reinforcement item 163 globally corresponds to the reinforcement item number 125 in the quantity) ? Also, if there is a total of 125 item iron in the whole drawing, "donna Isn't that the meaning of 'Expose the gun globally'? Why are the "global poses" in the drawings and the "global poses" in the footage different? Good work

Hello again, What I said is due to a different situation and program algorithm. Currently, you cannot get the poses in the metering report to be the same as the reinforcement metering table. The pose in the metering report corresponds to which item in the reinforcement metering table, and it can be found by checking the reinforcement lengths. It is among our request notes that the poses in the drawing and quantity report can be taken in the same way. Good work

 

[aykut_k]

What is the ratio to the eccentric in the analysis settings?

 

[HakanŞahin]

What is the ratio of eccentric to eccentric in the analysis settings?

The ratio of eccentric to eccentric is the ratio that determines how far the earthquake forces will be affected from the center of mass in structures with rigid diaphragms. According to TDY, it should be taken as 5%.

 

[enginuy]

I added loads to the panels. I see the loads I added in perspective, it doesn't show up in user defined loads in the reports. However, I can see the load I add to the columns both in perspective and in the report.

 

[windtalker]

In the attached project, I receive a warning of insufficiency in raft foundationo section and raft foundation reinforcements. Even though I subtract 150 cm, the warning continues. I reduced the spacing of the insufficient additional reinforcements to 5 cm, but it uses 32 reinforcements. What are your opinions and suggestions about the project? Thank you.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[Levent Özpak]

I added loads to the panels. I see the loads I added in the perspective, but it does not appear in the user-defined loads in the reports. However, I can see the load I added to the columns both in the perspective and in the report.

The loads defined on the panels modeled as shells are not printed in the reports. Perspective window can be viewed in 3D frame mode.

 

[Levent Özpak]

In the attached project, I get a warning of insufficiency in raft foundationo section and raft foundation reinforcements. Even though I increased 150 cm, the warning continues. I reduced the spacing of the insufficient additional reinforcements to 5 cm, but it uses 32 reinforcements. About the project What are your comments and suggestions?Thank you

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Hello, In your project, the moments in the regions where the S5-S9 and S9 columns are located In these areas, extending the foundations by 50 cm outwards (top, left and right) may help reduce the additional cm of reinforcement.

 

[windtalker]

Mr. Levent, I do not have such a chance since the project is botic order, but even the enormous increase in thickness in general does not work. After changing the reinforcement intervals manually in the additional reinforcement tab and getting the error error, the same problem occurs again when I get a report.

 

[Levent Özpak]

... after changing the reinforcement intervals manually in the additional reinforcement tab and getting the ace error, the same problem occurs again.

If you are reanalyzing after removing the AS error, the Ace error is calculated again because the additional reinforcements are recalculated. it's normal to come out....

 

[windtalker]

This is the case when I get a report without reanalysis. The problem is that the problem cannot be solved, in fact, it is abnormal that the 32-inch iron comes out at 5 cm intervals.

 

[Levent Özpak]

This is the case when I get a report without re-analysis. The problem is that the problem can't be solved, in fact, it is abnormal that the 32-inch iron comes out 5 cm apart.

You asked for suggestions and opinions from the forum... I gave you the suggestion to my knowledge. If you don't like the suggestion or you can't apply it, you can apply a solution you found yourself. If you think that the raft foundation moments are excessive, you can export your project file to sap 2000 and compare the results...

. I get the same problem again when I get it.

Contact us about this situation. Let's access your computer remotely and look at the situation in detail.

 

[HakanŞahin]

This is the case when I get a report without re-analysis. The problem is that the problem can't be solved, in fact, the 32-inch iron coming out at 5 cm intervals is abnormal.

Hi, Your raft foundation is being forced from vertical loads... Increasing the thickness of the raft is worth the moment. it does not always create a reduction, of course it has an effect on the calculation of reinforced concrete.It is difficult for you to provide relief at the base without enlarging the base area and spreading the moment distribution over a wider area.

 

[windtalker]

Hello, after solving the attached project and getting a report, I switched to layout editing and finished the project. When I want to get a report again, I get the error "Total Nd in X and direction is greater than 0.45* total Nk....". When I bring the same file from the d folder to the desktop and get a report, the error does not appear. I can say that now I have an error and an error-free report of the same file. Attached is the file I got the error. Thanks.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Hi, after solving the attached project and getting a report, I switched to layout editing and finished the project. When I want to get a report again, I get the error "Total Nd in the X and direction is greater than 0.45* total Nk...". Same When I bring the file from the d folder to the desktop and get a report, there is no error. Now I can say that the same file has an error and an error-free report. The file I got error is attached. Thank you.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Let's connect remotely and look at the problem on your computer 0 224 220 67 17

 

[Levent Özpak]

Hi, after solving the attached project and getting a report, I switched to layout editing and finished the project. When I want to get a report again, I get the error "Total Nd in the X and direction is greater than 0.45* total Nk...." Same. When I bring the file from the d folder to the desktop and get a report, the error does not appear. Now I can say that the same file has an error and an error-free report. The file I got the error is attached. Thank you.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Hello, When the analysis is done in the project, " Total Nd in X and direction is greater than 0.45* total Nk...." warning is not given. Weak for ground floor floor warning.

 

[illaga]

Ladder detail In İdecad, the program does not create detailed staircase details. Are we going to solve this with our own engineering skills? Best regards..