Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[HakanŞahin]

I am a 3rd year civil engineering student, I downloaded the demo version of idecad static 7 and I am using it, but I cannot use some ready projects with the version mismatch. I think the demo version is 7.017, but the ready-made projects I have are 7.020, I wonder if the demo version can be updated. ?

Yes, demos are being prepared for 7.020...

 

[elif ceren ankaralı]

What should I do so that my basement curtains do not appear on the ground floor column application plan when I get a drawing

 

[HakanŞahin]

what should I do so that my basement curtains do not appear on the ground floor column application plan when I draw them, urgent answer friends

You have the opportunity to do it in 2 different ways: You can delete the basement curtains in the plan window, after receiving the column application plan, to "undo" to bring back the basement curtains again... While the column application is taking, the basement curtains will not be visible in the drawing because they have been deleted... or because each part of the sub-basement curtains is made a block in the column application, click, You can delete it as a whole.

 

[illaga]

.rpt files After installing the new update, I cannot set the idecad .rpt file as default. can you help me

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: .rpt files

After installing the new update, I cannot set the idecad .rpt file as default. My footage files saved on the desktop are not automatically default .rpt? can you help[ /quote] Your problem is not fully understood. If you are talking about opening the rpt file by double-clicking, there is no action on the program installation. To open the rpt file by double-clicking it, first press the right button on the file for once. If ide RPT does not appear in the Recommended programs section of the dialog that appears, click the Browse option and select the ideRPT.exe file under the C:\Program Files\ideCAD\ideCAD Static 7 folder. Click to exit the dialog and double-click the rpt file and it will open with the iderpt program.

 

[HakanŞahin]

I am a 3rd year civil engineering student, I downloaded the demo version of idecad static 7 and I am using it, but I cannot use some ready-made projects with the version mismatch. I think the demo version is 7.017 but the ready-made projects I have are 7.020, I wonder if the demo version can be updated mu ?

Yes, demos are being prepared for 7.020...

You can download 7.020 demos from our "download" page.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[elif ceren ankaralı]

Relative story drift is too high, I get a report to increase the rigidity, what should I do?

 

[HakanŞahin]

relative story drift is too high, I get a report saying increase the rigidity, what should I do

Column dimensions seem insufficient... The project needs to be examined in order to give a more detailed answer.

 

[elif ceren ankaralı]

how to load the project

 

[HakanŞahin]

how to upload the project

There is a "Plugin download" section under the frame where you write your message, you can use it. However, there is a file size limit. You can add the project compressed. If the size is too large, you can upload it to one of the file sharing sites You can give the link.

 

[elif ceren ankaralı]

I'm having a relative floor drift problem, even though I've enlarged the columns, help please

 

[Levent Özpak]

I have a relative floor drift problem, please help even though I enlarged the columns

Hello, *In the project, the foundation system was designed as a rafter raft and the analysis was made by selecting the superstructure interactive solution option in the Analysis Settings. The raft foundation system is not suitable for a superstructure-foundation interactive solution.If a superstructure-interactive solution is to be made, the foundation system should be designed as a beamless raft... *The foundation system is designed as a beamless raft as in the example, and when the dimensions of the columns on the B axis are enlarged in the X-axis direction, the floor drift problem is solved.

 

[elif ceren ankaralı]

thank you very much, finally I don't know the exact settings in the program because I'm a little new

 

[proisa]

When I analyze the project I have added, there is no problem. Then I do the second analysis without changing anything, some column-beam junction safety errors appear. Then I analyze again without changing anything, it goes back to its previous error free state. It continues like this in a loop.

 

[proisa]

In the project I added this time, when we calculate the earthquake loads according to mode combination, the solution is normal, there is no element that gives errors. But when we use the response spectrum with the distributed masses, all the columns. It gives E,M,K,As(-) warning.

 

[HakanŞahin]

In the project I added this time, when we calculate the earthquake loads according to mode combination, the solution is normal, there is no element that gives error. But when we use the response spectrum with distributed masses, all columns. E,M,K,As(-) It gives a warning.

In your project, the number of modes is insufficient for the response spectrum resolution... Increase the number of modes, the results will become normal.

 

[Levent Özpak]

When I analyze the project I added, there is no problem. Then I do the second analysis without changing anything, some column-beam junction safety errors appear. Then I analyze again without changing anything, it goes back to the old error-free state. This is how it is. It continues in a loop.

Hello, there is a situation caused by the load distribution on the SD01 slab on the 3rd floor. There is no problem in the analysis according to the fully rigid diaphragm option. We have included the situation in the project in our notes.

 

[proisa]

When I analyze the project I added, there is no problem. Then I do the second analysis without changing anything, some column-beam junction safety errors appear. Then I analyze again without changing anything, it goes back to its previous error free state. It continues in a loop like this.

Hello, there is a situation caused by the load distribution on the SD01 slab on the 3rd floor. There is no problem in the analysis according to the fully rigid diaphragm option. We took the situation of the project in our notes.

I almost completed the project, but I wondered whether the analysis in the case where it gave an error or the other one is correct?

 

[Levent Özpak]

I don't see any problem when I analyze the project I added. Then I do the second analysis without changing anything, some column- beam connection safety errors occur. Then I analyze again without changing anything, it returns to its former error-free state. It continues in a loop like this.

Hello, there is a situation caused by the load distribution on the SD01 slab on the 3rd floor. In the analysis according to the fully rigid diaphragm option There is no problem.We took the situation of the project in our notes.

I have almost completed the project, but I was wondering, is the analysis in the case of error or the other one correct?

The analysis that gives a B warning in the columns seems correct.

 

[hakan_sb]

In the project I am doing now, how can I make the modeling of the curtain modeling at the end elevation: 3.50 and the other end, the sloped curtain at the 2.50 side? ff. edr.