German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish For both of your projects, I say; * First of all, review the issues in geometry control. What is written there is sometimes a warning and sometimes it is expressed as conditions that must be followed. * Then, the basic definition of TK8 is constantly wrong. It has been said and discussed many times in this forum. While the requirements of the regulation are clear, please review your idea of passing such a large opening (8.xm) with 35 cm beam (even if it does not provide, but it provides deflection conditions). Expressing in an appropriate language I'm going to try to do this. I've been made of reinforced concrete and it has surprised possible people. So no matter what, you should set your confidence limits in reinforced concrete well and pay attention to the dimension relationship. Leaving aside your beams (!?) 27, your ribs are also worth examining I think r. Good luck with. With love...."bha":3umkdzew" said:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7
- Thread starter Ismail Hakki Besler
- Start date
Hello, the program closes itself during the tile analysis (the project is not completed yet, I haven't tried it, but it will probably close during the project analysis) and I get a warning for sending a bug report. When I examined the report, "msvcr100.dll" is shown as the source, when I searched I found out that it is related to "microsoft visul C++". Although I tried to download and install the current visul C++ from microsoft's site, I could not succeed. it gave the following error report. OS Version = 5.1.2600, Platform 2, Service Pack 3 OS Description = WinXP - x86 Professional Service Pack 3 CommandLine = d:\543be7863a3bfd8b7a665abd6f\Setup.exe TimeZone = GTB Daylight Saving Time Initial LCID = 1055 Using Simultaneous Download and Install mechanism Operation: Repairing Package Name = Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 x86 Redistributable Setup Package Version = 10.0.30319 User Experience Data Collection Policy: UserControlled Operation updated to: Uninstalling Number of applicable items: 2 MSI (d:\543be7863a3bfd8b7a665abd6f\ vc_red.msi) Uninstall failed. Msi Log: Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 x86 Redistributable Setup_20130530_015438796-MSI_vc_red.msi.txt Final Result: Installation failed with error code: (0x80070663), "Failed to open this hotfix package. Verify that the hotfix package exists and you can access it or that it is a valid Windows Installer hotfix package contact your application vendor to verify it. " (Elapsed time: 0 00:00:05). waiting for contributions from friends who are interested in programming languages... good work, regards... Note: Win XP, Service Pack3 , 4GB RAM, 32-bit
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hello, Call us, connect to your computer with remote access and look at the problem... 0 224 220 67 17"Mirza":3qr7wc9v" said:the program shuts itself down during the tile analysis (the project is not completed yet, I haven't tried it, but it will probably close during the project analysis) and I get a warning to send a bug report. when I examine the report, it shows "msvcr100.dll" as the source, when I search I found out that this is about "microsoft visul C++". I tried to download and install the latest visul C++ from microsoft's site, but I could not succeed. It gave the following error report.
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hello, scaling on walls is already done only in accordance with the thickness of the panel. In the long direction, the distance between two columns is certain... The curtain is scaled by that distance. For curtains that are not between two columns, the column scale given in the column application settings is valid... application; 1/20 column-panel detail) In short, we could not fully understand the problem you are experiencing and what you want to do."proisa":19obymz6" said:Hi, Is it possible to change the Long Direction Scales of the Walls Without Flood Curtains in the Column Application Plans? At 1/50 scale, the reinforcements are very confusing and the controls are difficult. Thanks
I want to say this. Curtains scale 1/20 in the short direction to 1/50 in the long directions in plan. Generally, there is a column between two columns or in one direction. When we open the details in the column application plans in place, the reinforcements in the curtain cannot be placed in the long direction scaled 1/50 and they are mixed. Curtain headboard and middle fittings are intertwined. The opening is not clear. The reinforcements are not visible in the layout like the columns. If the pitch is a parameter related to the long direction scale. 1/20 can sometimes enter other columns. But for example, if we could do 1/40 - 1/30 by choosing ourselves."HakanŞahin":3j7yzftu" said:Hello, The scaling of the curtains between two columns is already done only in line with the thickness of the panel. In the long direction, the distance between the two columns is clear... The screen scales as much as that distance. For curtains that are not between two columns, the column scale given in the column application settings is valid... (Default 1/50 plan application; 1/20 column-panel detail) In short, we could not fully understand the problem you are experiencing and what you want to do."proisa":3j7yzftu" said:Hi there, Is it possible to change the Long Direction Scales of Curtains Without Basin Curtains in Column Application Plans? At 1/50 scale, equipment is very confusing and controls are difficult. Thanks
Levent Özpak
New Member
Hello, there is no element-based scaling option in the Column application plan. However, if you want, you can only export the detail of that element by selecting "Always detail outside in the application" in the Drawing tab of the relevant screen's Settings. Good work."proisa":26ofjk9u" said:I mean this. Curtains are scaled 1/20 in the short direction and 1/50 in the long direction. There are usually a column between two columns or in one direction. When we open the details on the column application plans, it is 1/50 The reinforcements inside the curtain cannot be placed in the scaled long direction and they get mixed up. The shear head and middle reinforcements interfere with each other. The opening is not clear. The reinforcements are not visible like columns in the layout. If there is a parameter related to the long direction scale of the curtain, 1/20 can sometimes enter other columns. But for example, ourselves If we could make 1/40 - 1/30 by selecting it.
I know the option to export the detail, but it is requested on the spot. I do not change ideStatik to any program, but in others it is enlarged even if it is not 1/20 in scale and the iron placements look comfortable on the plan. Since I am the only one who actively uses ideStatik in the city, I am really tired of explaining to everyone. (Reports, accounts, drawings, etc.) Everyone seems to be accustomed to the other equivalent program and its acceptances are regulations. (For example, calculating or not calculating the alpha s of the curtains in the short direction.) It takes a lot of time to fix it manually.
I don't know if it will work for you (I guess you will). One column application chart, 1/50 and 20 scale. Then you draw another column application plan. Here you make both the Application scale and the column scale, for example 1/35. Which column or screen you want to get from the new drawing, you can copy and paste it into the first drawing. In this way, your column or curtain will be full size and will write all the reinforcements and dimensions. As far as I understand, this is what you want. Try it, I think it will work for you. Good luck with."proisa":3eylqk4k" said:Curtains are scaled 1/20 in the short direction - 1/50 in the long directions in the plan.There is usually a column between two columns or in one direction.When we open the details on the column application plans, the length scales 1/50 are scaled. The reinforcements inside the curtain in the undirection cannot be placed and are mixed. Curtain headboard and middle fittings are intertwined. The opening is not clear. The reinforcements are not visible in the layout like the columns. If the pitch is a parameter related to the long direction scale. 1/20 can sometimes enter other columns. But for example, if we could do 1/40 - 1/30 by choosing ourselves."HakanŞahin":3eylqk4k" said:Hello, The scaling in the walls between two columns is already done only in line with the thickness of the panel. In the long direction, the distance between the two columns is certain. for curtains without columns, the column scale given in the column application settings is valid... (Default 1/50 plan application; 1/20 column-panel detail) In short, we did not fully understand the problem you are experiencing and what you want to do."proisa":3eylqk4k" said:Hi there, Is it possible to change the Long Direction Scales of the Curtains Without Basin Curtains in Column Application Plans? 1/50 In the scale, the reinforcements are very confusing and the controls are difficult. Thanks
I wanted to write down a few things I noticed in the new version 1) Also for secondary beams, min. I get the warning that the width cannot be less than 25cm 2) Although I introduce the basement perimeter curtains as basement curtains, I get the warning of brittle element Even for R=2, these sections, which have higher shear strength, naturally have low shear strength from the shear force Ve (calculated according to the capacity method) . However, it does not make much sense to carry out this control, it is very normal for extremely rigid basement perimeter curtains to be brittle elements. (Apply ductile construction materials to rigid basement tab is unchecked) 3) It looks a bit strange in the report that the control related to the equivalent.3.14 printed in the report is printed as if it were an error, after all, it is an article whose structural system only concerns systems consisting of shear walls (actually, item as 0.75' It is more logical if it concerns buildings larger than , but unfortunately it says buildings consisting of shear walls only) 4) Normal ductile solution is allowed in buildings with Hn<25m for the frame and Hn<13m for the toothed cassette in the 3rd and 4th earthquake zones. had been discussed. But now it appears again as an error in the report. This error should be printed in earthquake zones 1 and 2 in the report, not 3 and 4. (The regulation says buildings consisting of frames only, but the intention here is UNDESIRED. Tdy always encourages the use of curtains. TDY, which allows an UNDESIRED situation in this way, quite allows the normal ductile solution of buildings consisting of curtains and frames, with the above conditions. Therefore, it only happens to the building carried by columns. It doesn't make much sense for the situation to be unacceptable just because we threw a curtain...
"NYILMAZ":bkaf9nl2" said:I don't know if it will do the job (I guess you will). One column application plotter, 1/50 and 20 scale. Then you draw another column application plan. Here you can draw both the application scale and the column scale. For example, you can make 1/35. You can copy which column or curtain you want to get from the new drawing and paste it into the first drawing. This way, your column or curtain will be full size and write all the reinforcements and dimensions. As far as I understand, this is what you want. Try it, I guess it will do the trick. Take it easy.[ /quote] Thank you very much, I will try this way...
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hello, 1.) The beams that sit on the beams on both sides, which we call the secondary beam... The program is for them "width from 25cm can't be less" gives no warning. Elements sitting on a column on one side are considered primary beams. Apart from this, if you see a different situation specific to the project, we can look at the project. 2.) Can you add a sample project about it? 3.) Equation 3.14 report is for informational purposes only. You can ensure that the optional reports are not printed by not marking them. 4.) In previous versions, controls were made for the buildings in question without considering the earthquake zone. In this sense, the control is still at the initiative of the developer... In 7.019, the correction was made only for the height control. We can write it as a request to be checked according to the earthquake zone."siromar":2a4x7f4i" said:I wanted to write down a few things that I noticed in the new version 1) I get a warning that the minimum width cannot be less than 25cm in the geometry control for secondary beams 2) I get a brittle element warning even though I introduce basement perimeter curtains as basement curtains R Even for =2, these sections, which have high shear strength, naturally have low shear strength due to the shear force Ve (calculated according to the capacity method).However, it does not make sense to do this check, it is normal for the extremely rigid basement perimeter walls to be brittle elements (ductile). Apply building materials to rigid basement tab is not ticked) 3) It looks a bit strange in the report that the control related to equivalent.3.14 printed in the report is printed as if it were an error, after all, it is an article that only concerns systems whose structural system consists of curtain walls (actually, item as is greater than 0.75). It would be more logical if it concerns buildings that have seismic activity, but unfortunately it only says buildings with curtains) 4) In the 3rd and 4th earthquake zones, Normal ductile solution is allowed in buildings with Hn<25m for the frame and Hn<13m for the toothed cassette. This issue has even been discussed before. But now it appears again as an error in the report. This error should be printed in earthquake zones 1 and 2 in the report, not 3 and 4. (The regulation says buildings consisting of frames only, but the intention here is UNdesirable. Tdy always encourages the use of curtains. In this way, TDY allows the normal ductile solution of buildings consisting of curtains and frames to be highly permissible with the above conditions. Therefore, it only happens to the building carried by columns. It doesn't make much sense for the situation to be unacceptable just because we threw one curtain... I would appreciate if you could inform me about the issues. Good work
HakanŞahin
Administrator
"siromar":6pc8d37n" said:hello sir 1. It must be specific to the project; I'm putting a relevant ss in the 2nd and 4th item I'm putting the ss of the warning I mentioned about the 2nd and 4th item. Can you send your project to [email protected]
Hello.. First of all, thank you for the information you have provided.. I have 3 problems.. 1. In the window parts I open in the basement curtains, the 16-gauge reinforcement is used and I want it to use 14. 2. In continuous foundations, sometimes I want to lay a foundation under the 40/150 sized columns that come to the corner areas, but I can't.. I want to throw it from one end of the same column to the other.. but the program does not throw it.. what could be the reason for this.. I would be glad if you could help.. 3. Sometimes the additional reinforcements in the beams increase because of high moments (as the number of floors increase).. even if I make 2 rows on the beam, it is too much to fit.. it does not give any warning.. what do you recommend for this.. in practice, these extra reinforcements create huge problems. . Good luck with..
Levent Özpak
New Member
Hello,
The diameter of the curtain gap reinforcements is automatically selected as 16. These reinforcements are used for curtains. After you get the detail, you can change it with the text change command"Dogannn":14ug0tmw" said:1. In the window parts I open in basement curtains, the reinforcement is using 16 and I want it to use 14, where can I change it?
Column object is a bar element. Therefore, it is not possible to draw a continuous basis only under the column as in the Panel object. Even if it is drawn, erroneous data entry is made. Good work"Dogannn":14ug0tmw" said:2. In continuous foundations, sometimes I want to lay a foundation under the 40/150 sized columns that come to the corner areas, but I can't.. I want to throw it from one end of the same column to the other.. but the program does not throw it.. what could be the reason for this
coskun3561
New Member
Hello there; A question mark arises in my mind about building performance analysis. 2-storey building, openings are low, C18 concrete, reinforcement amounts are not bad (except for stirrup tightening), when I have a performance analysis, the structure appears to be in collapse. The project is attached, is there something I'm doing wrong? Although it is not like new buildings, I think it should not come out in case of collapse. The building will be evaluated within the scope of urban transformation, so I don't want to go wrong. Since there is no new regulation at the moment, they want Performance analysis. Another issue is risky building analysis. When we apply it to old buildings, the results are risky or not. When we receive a report according to the normal earthquake regulations, there is no error in the building. Isn't there a conflict here? As IDECAD, do you plan to provide training on how the program can be used more efficiently on risky building analysis? It looks like it will be needed. Regards, good work.
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hello, It seems that the ground floor is "3.88 meters high" and there is no "stirrup tightening" in the columns. In addition, especially on the ground floor, some beams have "insufficient bending capacity". In general, "hardware/dimension shortage" stands out. The result you got in your project seemed normal to me. As for the risky building analysis, the program is also in the testing phase since the regulation has not been published yet... It may be useful to report any incompatibilities you see in the risky building regulation to the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, as the regulation has not yet been published. Your question is not clear how the program can be used more efficiently for risky building analysis. In terms of education, the leaflet for data entry was published on the forum."coskun3561":ltitpgso" said:Hi; I have a question mark about building performance analysis. 2-storey building, low openings, C18 concrete, reinforcement quantities are not bad (except for stirrup tightening), when I have a performance analysis, the building appears to collapse. Project Is there anything in the appendix that I did wrong? Although it is not like new buildings, I think that it should not collapse in case of collapse. The building will be evaluated within the scope of urban transformation, so I do not want to make a mistake. They want a Performance analysis because there is no new regulation at the moment. Another issue is risky building analysis When we apply it to old buildings, the risky or not results are ok, but when we do a risky building analysis without changing the data of the projects for which we have just solved and licensed (C30-S420-stirrup density is available-the limits are not enforced in the design), the buildings are risky. The error does not appear.Isn't there a conflict here? As IDECAD, do you plan to provide a training on how the program can be used more efficiently in this regard? It looks like it will be needed. Regards, good work.
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
If you have any further questions regarding risky building analysis, we will try to answer as best we can. Good work