Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[Levent Özpak]

Hello, There does not appear to be a problem with data entry in the project.

 

[windtalker]

thanks, good work

 

[proisa]

Hello, Although there is no B2 irregularity in the irregularities section when I receive the Optional Report in the project I have attached, in the same report, it is written that there is B2 irregularity in the R Coefficient section. For this reason, although there is no irregularity in both A1 and B2, the lower limit value Beta is 0.9 in dynamic analysis. What is the reason? Thanks

 

[Levent Özpak]

Hello In the project I added, when I received the Elective Report, although there was no B2 irregularity in the irregularities section, in the same report, there was B2 irregularity in the selection reasons section of the R Coefficient. Therefore, although there is no both A1 and B2 irregularities, the lower limit in dynamic analysis value takes Beta of 0.9. What is the reason? Thank you

Hello, The situation you stated is due to the fact that the stair exit column is not connected to the intermediate landing and the upper rigid floor number is taken differently for both directions in the Analysis settings. When creating a staircase, create the contour of the intermediate landing in parts as in the example. I think it would be more appropriate to take the upper rigid floor number as -2 for both directions due to the BAP03 angled curtain.

 

[proisa]

[/quote] Hello, The situation you stated is due to the fact that the stair exit column is not connected to the intermediate landing and the upper rigid floor number is taken differently for both directions in the Analysis settings. When creating a staircase, create the contour of the intermediate landing in parts as in the example. Because of the BAP03 angled curtain, I think it would be more appropriate to take the upper rigid floor number as -2 for both directions. Good work[/quote] I don't understand why the stair arm is not connected to the intermediate landing. In your drawing, while drawing the route on the intermediate landing, you created points at the places where the stair arms end and connect. Does data entry always need to be done like this? Are the stair reversals (not the stair itself) calculated incorrectly in my drawing?

 

[Levent Özpak]

Hello, The situation you have stated is due to the fact that the stair exit column is not connected to the intermediate landing and the upper rigid floor number is taken differently for both directions in the Analysis settings. When creating the stairs, create the contour of the intermediate landing in parts as in the example I think it would be more appropriate to take the upper rigid floor number as -2 for both directions because of the BAP03 angled curtain. Good work[/quote] I did not understand the reason why the stair arm is not connected to the intermediate landing. In your drawing, while drawing the route on the intermediate landing, the points where the stair arms end and connect You have created it. Is it always necessary to enter data like this. [/quote] Yes, it should be done like this. When it is not created in a piecemeal way, the second arm does not connect to the intermediate landing.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Fixes reported in the forum and fixed in version 7.019:

I know that all of the information I requested below is somehow available in the program. Nevertheless: Performance analysis reports, reinforcement or general analysis report results Can it be in elective report format as it is? Or performance analysis reports; - building layouts - building general information - beam loads - slab loads can be added? Also performance analysis in the preliminary information; - information level coefficient (I know it is written in the table, but...) - earthquake level used - calculated performance level - expected performance level can be added? /quote]

Supporting Mr. NYILMAZ's proposal. 1- Like "Earthquake regulation general report" (icon); Can we get the results from the screen with the "reinforcement regulation general report"(icon)? 2-"Selective reports"(icon) already; In "Static report settings" there is a section "Boost reports" . If the options currently printed in the retrofit report are added here, the retrofit reports can be printed, along with all the information we print in the optional reports. Take it easy

Does the program control alpha s in systems with normal pitched ductility level? According to TDY 2.5.3.1, alpha s >=0.75. ( However, as less than 0.75 although the program does not notify about changing the ductility level)

I wish you a good day, I searched the forum but could not find it, so I opened a new thread. I would like to ask, for beams with high ductility level (same condition for beams with low ductility level) according to TDY 2007, there is a restriction in article 3.4.1 (a) that the minimum beam width will be 250mm. Although I selected the ductility level as high in my model, I could not see any warning in the program when I used 200mm wide beams. Have I overlooked something? Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK

Good afternoon, "The smallest dimension of rectangular columns is 250 mm and the cross-sectional area is less than 250 mm for the cross-section of columns in the column cross-section control (TDY 3.3.1.1). It shall not be less than 75000 mm². Despite the clear statement that "the diameter of circular columns will be at least 300 mm", when I define a circular column with a diameter of 300 mm in the program, I get a "column with low cross section" warning. I think cross-sectional area control is applied in circular columns as well. I wanted to share. Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK

]

I noticed something wrong in the column shear safety section of the report, take it easy, good work

 

[proisa]

Where can I find the published regulation on identifying risky buildings? Interesting, but I couldn't find the technical regulation on the internet.

 

[proisa]

How is the risky floor determined?

 

[windtalker]

Hello, In the attached retaining wall project, the values in the reinforcement table appear in red. It's something I've encountered on the forum before. How can I solve it? Thanks.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Hello, the red color in the reinforcement table is due to the lack of reinforcement. In the Retaining Wall Reinforcement Selection dialog, mark the console vertical reinforcement up to 28 reinforcement diameters and perform a retaining wall analysis. Good work

 

[HakanŞahin]

Where can I find the published regulation on identifying risky buildings. Interesting but I could not find the technical regulation on the internet.

The regulation may have been published yet, it will be published soon.. To the last text we obtained from the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (Rules to be used in Risky Building Detection_23_01_2013.pdf)

How is the risky floor determined?

During the analysis, the critical solid program asks us.

 

[duraninşaat]

PROJECT LINK:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

dear ünver hello... i follow your messages on the forum, you give good answers and i am sending this message with the thought that if you have time, i have a project, i can say it is big in terms of the region i'm in.. i finished my project as a result of the analysis, there were no problems in the reports, only because i am new in this profession. It's not that I don't have thoughts like whether I have made any mistakes, even if they are small. I would like to ask you, if you have time, can you look at the feast in general terms and take advantage of your experience and send me a message if you can advise me... I shared it on the forum, but no one who wrote cvp. I would like you to help me... Let me give you a short information about the project. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The region I am in is a 1st degree earthquake zone, ground class CZ4, I built a semi-basement at the request of the customer (I had to solve it with the foundation system called lame foundation, but I think I took the necessary precautions, I am talking about basement curtains) there is ground floor + 3 floors and a roof We will close the roof with the help of steel profiles, I just continued the columns and left them dead (of course I left the columns considering the 33% roof slope) this is already available in other values in the analysis settings, I would be very grateful if you could help me ... thank you very much in advance...

 

[proisa]

When we define the column head due to stapling on the raft foundation, do we need to give the column in the basement a level equal to the height of the column head?

 

[HakanŞahin]

When we define the column header due to stapling on the raft foundation, do we need to give the column in the basement the same height as the column header?

The elevation of the column does not affect the punching calculation... We don't need to give the elevation as much as the height, but in the section, it will look like whatever you give the column elevation.

 

[NYILMAZ]

I tick the command apply general settings/settings to all windows in the program. I go to another floor, there is no sign when I look there. I come to the same floor that I marked again, and the mark I marked has been removed. Thus; For example, let's say that the beams on all floors are scanned (drawing details/beam scan). But only the current floor changes, I have to do each floor separately. Where is the problem?

 

[Levent Özpak]

I tick the command apply general settings/settings to all windows in the program. I move to another floor, there is no sign when I look there. I come to the same floor I marked again, the old one So, for example, I want to scan the beams on all floors (drawing details/beam scan), but only the current floor changes, I have to do each floor separately Where is the problem?

Hello, the changes made in the Layer Settings/ Drawing Details tab only work on the active floor. When the apply to all floors option is checked in the General Settings, the current settings are applied to all floors. Then the dialog It is normal that that line does not appear marked when entered. Good work

 

[izmirlimuhendis]

In the project, I want to connect the two ends of the U side of the S20 column (polygon U column) with a beam, but I cannot define a beam. can you help me.

 

[Levent Özpak]

I want to connect the two ends of the U side of the S20 column (polygon U column) with a beam, but I can't define a beam. Can you help me.

Hello, Since the polygon column is a bar element, there is no beam or beam in between. Floor edge cannot be entered.You can enter the polygon column with panel objects and model it as a shell.Good work

 

[bha]

good day friends, I have 64 m2 flooring in the attached file, I made 2 different designs, I am waiting for your opinions on which one will be healthier, good work

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.