Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

"HakanŞahin":h5s5xzcf" said:
"NYILMAZ":h5s5xzcf" said:
* In V6-V7, nothing is visible except the red and green dots in the Reinforced Concrete configuration of the beam reinforcements. What could it be about.
The graphics card was Nvidia 9600M GT. After updating from nnivia.com, there is no problem.
When I open another project, there is no problem. The problem still persists in the project we transferred (v6-v7). ?! :(
 
1-) While there is no B2 irregularity in the Irregularity report in the earthquake regulation general report, it says that there is B2 irregularity on the ground floor in the x direction on the detail page. And it doesn't print on the first page. What is the reason? 2-) While doing the analysis, although there is no B3 irregularity in the system, "TDY article 2.3.2.4 - The internal forces of the element are increased with B3 irregularity." says
 
"NYILMAZ":27qbzf5a" said:
There is no problem when I open another project. The problem still persists in the project we transferred (v6-v7). ?! :(
Hello, I looked at your project. The beam drawing layers are closed in the project. 1. Click on the Layer Settings command 2. In the Layer Settings dialog check "Apply to all drawings" 3. Click on the "Open All" button 4. Close the dialog with "OK" 5. Enter the Beam Settings. The beam drawings will appear.
 
"ryildiz":17br3fl9" said:
1-) While there is no B2 irregularity in the Irregularity report in the general report of the earthquake regulation, on the detail page it says that there is B2 irregularity on the ground floor in the x direction. And it is not printed on the first page. What is the reason? 2-) B3 irregularity in the system while analyzing even though there is no TDY article 2.3.2.4 - The internal forces of the elements are increased with B3 irregularity.
Could you add your project?
 
ryildiz wrote: 1-) While there is no B2 irregularity in the Irregularity report in the general report of the earthquake regulation, the detail page of 1.jpg says that there is an irregularity of B2 on the ground floor in the x direction 2.jpg. And it doesn't print on the first page. What is the reason? 2-) While doing the analysis, although there is no B3 irregularity in the system, "TDY article 2.3.2.4 - The internal forces of the element are increased with B3 irregularity." says 3.jpg Can you add your project?
I am attaching the project Mr. Levent
 
"ryildiz":ke4wpv6q" said:
1-) While there is no B2 irregularity in the Irregularity report in the earthquake regulation general report, it says on the detail page that there is B2 irregularity on the ground floor in the x direction and it is not printed on the first page. I wonder what is the reason.
Your project has been taken into our notes for review
"ryildiz":ke4wpv6q" said:
2-) While analyzing, "TDY item 2.3.2.4 - The internal forces of the element are increased with B3 irregularity, even though there is no B3 irregularity in the system." says
There is no B3 irregularity in your project. The message is revealed in every project as the analysis phase. It has been taken in our detection notes. Good work ...
 
12 m control is not performed on reinforcements in rib expansions... is there a setting? I could not find...
 
"Levent Özpak":3bt71bfe" said:
"nahroyo":3bt71bfe" said:
no 12 m control on reinforcements in rib openings... is there a setting? I couldn't find it...
There is no 12-meter reinforcement length control in rib details at the moment.
It would be greatly appreciated if this deficiency is corrected in the upcoming updates. Because it takes a lot of time to fix it manually.. even it is a necessity to have this control in all elements because there is no iron longer than 12m in the market, there is no reinforcement anyway.. thanks for your interest
 
Hello. About Loads... To make the load libraries multi-layered, more detailed and transparent; Wall materials (brick/gas concrete/pumice/stone/gypsum plasterboard), interior and exterior plaster (gypsum/concrete plaster), exterior elements (layers such as load-bearing construction, glass, aluminum, marble, granite, stone, sheathing, etc.) Available In the beam load editor, similar to what is described in the slab load library, in the table below, all the layers that make up the wall, such as wall and wall substrate thicknesses, unit weight, plaster thickness, unit weight of the plaster, cannot be defined one by one. Result-i Word:We request a new beam and slab loads editor supported with visual shape.. Thank you..
 
Hello there. First of all, the problem I see is as follows; When idestatic is on, when we press the bar at the bottom right, plans such as floors and molded column beams appear in the sequence that opens. We come over these layers and open the relevant plan or floor. In the current version it's all mixed up. When one hurts, the other slides down. I'll be pleased if you pay attention. Good work
 
"dester":1mbboab2" said:
Hi. First of all, the problem I see is as follows; When idestatic is turned on, when we press the bar at the bottom right, the plans appear in the order that opens, such as floors and mold columns. We come over these layers and open the relevant plan or floor. In the current version All of them are confused. When you open one, the other slides to the bottom. I would appreciate your interest. Good work
Hello, It's not the mess you wrote, it's actually one of the new features of the program and it is activated when the number of windows increases. List: List of windows ----- Opened in the previous click It is organized as a list of windows... In short, a window you click from the window list is taken to the lower list in order of click. It works like a list of records.For example, the floor list is initially; 3rd floor 2nd floor 1st floor Formwork plan Beam expansion -- ---- Let the column appear as an application Let's assume that we click on the 2nd floor In this case, the list is: 3rd floor 1st floor Formwork plan Beam expansion ---- 2nd floor Column will be in the form of an application. Good work...
 
"Bolvadinim":sqr6oy2o" said:
Hello. About loads.. To make load libraries multi-layered, more detailed and transparent; Wall materials (brick/aerated concrete/pumice/stone/drywall), interior, exterior plaster (gypsum/concrete plaster), exterior elements (layers such as load-bearing construction, glass, aluminum, marble, granite, stone, sheathing, etc.) In the current beam load editor, similar to what is described in the floor load library, you can see the wall and wall substructure in the table below. All layers that make up the wall cannot be defined one by one, such as layer thicknesses, unit weight, plaster thickness, unit weight of plaster, etc. Result-i Word:New beam supported by visual shape, flooring we demand loads editor.. Thank you..
we really think this is a necessity... we hope that a study will be made for them in the coming updates, from the esteemed authorities...
 
In ribbed floors, there should be the possibility of drawing with hollow block and accordingly the quantity of the ribs. Of course, I think it would be even better if it could be given… I wonder if the authorities are considering a study on this issue? thanks for your interest...
 
In ribbed slabs, there should be the possibility of drawing with hollow block and accordingly the quantity of the moldings. Of course, I think it would be even better if it could be given as well… I wonder if the authorities are considering a study on this issue? thanks for your interest...
 
"nahroyo":28brdtea" said:
ribbed slabs should have the possibility of drawing with hollow blocks and accordingly the size of the reinforcement formwork sizes are given according to the empty space between the ribs, of course, there is no problem in the amount of reinforcement and concrete, but there is a big problem in the amount of formwork in this case... mold size should be given according to whether it is a hollow block, and I think it would be even better if the number of hollow blocks could be given...
 
"HakanŞahin":1jld1lw5" said:
Hi,
"KUBA2009":1jld1lw5" said:
2-ladder settings, 2, I can't enter the settings of the arm, the program closes. .
Could you send the ladder whose settings you could not enter as a project to [email protected]?
The drawing of the 5-stairs is very confusing, especially if there is a setting for the section markers or something, I wonder if I didn't find it?
Cross section marks are determined according to where the account axis passes. (Can you send a mixed sample to the same address?)
I sent the file with the relevant ladder to the address. stair cross section marks did not mix again, I don't understand how it happened, but now it is coming out properly
 
Dear Sir, I am reviewing idecad 7 version. My expectation is that in the mold plan, as in the colon application plan, the colon application plan. The floor selection and formwork plans were seen on the same sheet in the dialog. It would be nice if you could work on this. Because we usually stay and put the appli plans side by side. Good work
 
It seems that it would be better if the trio perspective view and returnable plan view and accordingly interactive camera trio in the right-click menu should take place in a certain order. . I think we should not look for perspective and plan in the menu every time. In summary, perspective view on the bottom line and its return plan view on the bottom line, can the interactive camera be just above it?
 
1- There is a problem with the S11 polygon column detail. 2- It seems that the k27 beam on B1 floor is connected to the beam, not the S1 column. 3- When I get symmetry of the same region from the left side, there is a problem of creating tiles. 4- It seems problematic in creating D2 (and symmetrical) flooring on the ground floor. 5- What is a band beam, what exactly does it do? sample? The link of the file is attached.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Back
Top