Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[GökhanYILMAZ]

I'm very sorry to ask one last question. It may sound clumsy to you, but I have to In the design I sent in the new attachment, which of the basics of TK07 and TK08 is correct. I placed one of them near the staggered foundation zero, and placed the other in such a way as to include the staggered foundation curtains. Unfortunately I can't contain the columns in the tier. Or is it okay if I don't put both? Can I get your opinion.

 

[Levent Özpak]

I'll apologize and ask one last question. It may sound clumsy to you, but I have to, in the design I sent in the new attachment, which of the TK07 and TK08 foundations is correct. I have placed one of them near the gradual foundation zero, the other one to include the gradual foundation curtains. Unfortunately, I can't include the columns in the level. Or is it okay if I don't include both? Can I get your opinion. warnings seem to have been ignored.

 

[GökhanYILMAZ]

I will ask one last question, with apologies. It may sound clumsy to you, but I have to, in the design I sent in the new attachment, which of the basics of TK07 and TK08 is correct. I placed one of them near the staggered foundation zero, and placed the other in such a way as to include the staggered foundation curtains. Unfortunately I can't contain the columns in the tier. Or is it okay if I don't put both? Can I get your opinion.

Both are correct in terms of basic results, but in terms of implementation, it would be appropriate to design the foundation so that it remains inside the column. Also, in the project you added, it seems that Mr. Emrah's warnings about data entry were not taken into account.

Notes about data entry are in front of me. i will fix it. However, the basic design did not fit my mind. It doesn't make much sense for it not to include the continuous base, the column. Unfortunately, dilation is not possible. I'm going to die of insomnia for 3 days. The program solves it in every way. But I couldn't decide because my logic didn't get it.

 

[unver]

Mr. GökhanYILMAZ "The notes about the data entries are in front of me. I'll fix it. However, the basic design just didn't make sense to me. It doesn't make much sense that it doesn't include the basic column all the time. Unfortunately, dilation is not possible. I will die of insomnia for 3 days. The program solves it in every way. But I couldn't decide because my logic didn't make sense." The basic suggestion that will relieve your insomnia: 1- make a 40-50 cm raft under the whole place you call the stage, 2- make a continuous foundation for the B and C axles, 3- make your own with a basement curtain from the top. connect as you did Your basic problem is solved. Take it easy, good work.

 

[unver]

CORRECTION "Make continuous foundations on B and C axles," INSTEAD of continuous foundation on B and F axles, IT WILL

 

[GökhanYILMAZ]

Hello Mr. Gökhan, The following are the situations we have identified regarding your project: -It would be more appropriate to put a continuous foundation under the curtains on the ground floor instead of tie beams. #4000BF]-D01 and D08 flooring that you created on the basement floor ceiling should be created by giving an elevation on the ground floor.[/color] -Creating the P01 and P02 curtain with the panel object may be more appropriate in terms of its basic definition. -D04 It would be more appropriate to arrange the reinforcement axis and working distances of the floors for each different angle. -No need for the raft slab edges defined for console floors at the base of the ground floor. -For the Ni<0.6 warning, it would be more appropriate to manually calculate the wall area on the ground floor and enter it from the analysis menu floor parameters dialog It may be appropriate to enlarge the column dimensions to meet the alphai<0.7 condition in the -1.floor.You can examine the attached project in terms of data entry.

He put the project together im. All but 2 of the above items are ok. I have 4 questions: 1) I took the floors D01 and D09 from the basement ceiling to the ground floor and gave them an elevation of +90. However, I am getting the "incorrect floor level" warning in geometry control. I can't get past this problem? 2) I defined the P01 and P02 curtains with the column icon. Aren't the curtains defined automatically because the aspect ratio is greater than 7? 3) When I receive a report, I get the warning "The ratio of the sum of the R coefficient 7 and the wall shear forces to the total base shear force is greater than 075". How can I overcome? 4) I switch to the ground floor foundation mode, I want to create a panel for the basement curtains, but even though I mark the nodes, the panel does not draw. Where am I doing wrong? I have to submit the project today. I am attaching the latest version. Many thanks to my friends who helped. Best regards.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[yildiz50]

Inclined Floors and Beams In my attached project, in the system that I created by inclining the attic floors and their attached elements, the beams at the roof end flows are intertwined with the beams of a lower floor. In these axles, I want to delete the beams and connect the floors to these beams by raising the elevations of the lower floor beams. Is it possible? What solution would you suggest? Thank you for your interest..

 

[Levent Özpak]

I put the project together. All but 2 of the above items are ok. I have 4 questions: 1) I took the floors D01 and D09 from the basement ceiling to the ground floor and gave them elevation to +90. However, the geometry is under control ' I'm getting 'incorrect floor level' warning. I couldn't overcome this problem? 4) I switch to ground floor foundation mode, I want to create a panel for basement curtains, but the panel does not draw even though I marked the nodal points. Where am I going wrong?

These two problems are interconnected There is no object in the part of the slab at +90 cm between the columns S13-S14. If there is going to be a basement curtain here, you must enter the basement curtain with an elevation from the panel settings. If you try to enter without adjusting the elevation, it will not be entered because it will overlap with the K11 beam. and then the floors must be entered (The basement curtains on the ground floor must be defined as the basement curtain from the object properties)

2) P01 and P I defined 02 curtains with the column icon. Aren't curtains defined automatically because the aspect ratio is greater than 7?

Rectangular columns that provide 1/7 ratio are resolved as curtains. However, they cannot be modeled as shells.

3) When I receive a report, I get the warning "The ratio of the sum of the R coefficient 7 and the shear forces to the total base shear force is greater than 075" How can I overcome it?

According to the Earthquake Code, if the force on the wall is above 0.75 in systems with high ductility level, the value calculated from the R=10-4*AlfaS formula should be entered. (TDY Article 2.5.2.2)Alpha Values and the R value to be entered are printed in the Earthquake Regulation General Report. (AlphaS ratio may not exceed 0.75 when the basement perimeter curtains are entered) In the project, the staircase is supported together with the structure according to the solution conditions. In this case, analysis should be made according to the semi-rigid diaphragm option. In addition, the reinforcement axis is defined on the stairs. Reinforcement drawings of straight-armed ladders are made automatically in the program. The reinforcement axes defined in the ladder disrupt the ladder formation. Therefore, it would be appropriate to delete the stair reinforcement axes in the general analysis.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[ryildiz]

It would be nice if ide 7 had the following feature It would be great if "Show/hide beam wall load" option was added to the program and we could see all the wall loads we entered (on floor basis) at the same time. It takes time to get on top of each beam and look at the wall load, and we can sometimes overlook it. Thank you for your interest and interest and I wish you success in your work.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: Inclined Slabs and Beams

In my attached project, in the system that I created by inclining the attic floors and their attached elements, the beams at the roof end flows are intertwined with the beams of a lower floor. I want to delete the beams and connect the floors to these beams by raising the elevations of the lower floor beams. Is this possible? What solution would you suggest? Thanks for your attention..

You can create the Attic Floor Ceiling in your project by entering the 1st floor ceiling. I am adding an example on the subject. In the sample project, you can enter the objects at different elevations as described below: Enter the Red colored beams K1-K2-K3-K4-K5-K6-K7 and DE1-DE2 slabs on the 2nd floor without any elevation or slope. Click the Bevel objects[/b] command. Select the DE1 tile and its associated elements and make it bevel. Do the same for the DE2 tile and its associated objects. A new layer in the Settings/Layer Settings dialog create. Let the layer name be slope. Select beams K2-K3-K5-K6-K7 and slabs DE1,DE2. Click the Change Object Layer command. Change the layers of these objects to bevel layer. Turn off the curved layer in the layer settings dialog. Now we will enter the beams K9-K10-K11-K12. Before entering the beams, type -50cm in the level line in the beam settings dialog. Exit the dialog by saying OK. Enter the beams K8-K9-K10-K11-K12. Select these beams we entered and click the object properties command. Reset the beam elevations in the dialog that opens. Enter tiles D03 and D04. Turn on the curved layer from the layer settings dialog. In the project, it would be appropriate to select the sloping slabs and select creating a rigid diaphragm option in the static tab of their properties and perform analysis.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: It would be nice if ide 7 also had the following feature

If "Show/hide beam wall load" option was added to the program, It would be great if we could see all of them (on the basis of floors) at the same time. It takes time to look at the wall load on each beam and sometimes we can miss it. Thank you for your interest and I wish you success in your work.

It can be viewed by marking the Loads line in the tree and selecting the Load types wall load. If you are talking about a different representation, could you elaborate with a sample image?

 

[GökhanYILMAZ]

Hello. I'm a new member of the forum. I'm also a new user of idecad. My problem is that the bed coefficient is very high in the project I'm doing. That's why I always did the basic design. It was very difficult to do. I forgot most if not everything. I was not sure about the continuous basic connections on a gradual basis. I would be very happy if a friend who has knowledge on this subject could examine the basic design in my project and tell me if I am wrong.

I started it now. I finished my project Dear Emrah YILDIZ, Levent ÖZPAK and unver... Thank you very much each of you. I wouldn't have been able to get it together without you. Attached is the final version of my project. I wish you good luck.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[Levent Özpak]

I started by saying

. Now I have finished my project. Dear Emrah YILDIZ, Levent ÖZPAK and unver... Thank you very much to each of you. I couldn't have done it without you. Attached is the final version of my project. I wish you good work.[/ quote] Dear Gökhan Yılmaz, *Your foundations on the I and E axis on the Ground Floor are connected to the columns and curtains. For example, the left support of TK41 is P01 and the right support is P02. But the foundation beam does not cover the curtains. Such an application will not happen. If the architecture does not allow, then those foundations are not covered at all. Don't do it. The elevations of the columns on the I and A axis on the ground floor should be entered as -80 cm. On the basement floor, the upper elevations of the relevant columns should be arranged as -80 cm. *My warning about the stair reinforcement axes was not taken into account. Also, I think we have kept the forum very busy on this subject. Review and finalize your project in the light of the information above.

 

[yildiz50]

Thank you very much, Mr. Levent. I created my system in line with the example you gave. There does not seem to be a major problem. Only the formwork plan draws the reinforcements of the slabs at different levels that I defined for the last floor in a single sheet. I tried closing and locking the inclined layer before drawing, but it still draws the formwork plans on top of each other.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Mr. Levent, Thank you very much. I created my system in line with the example you gave. There is no significant problem. Only the reinforcements of the floors at different levels that I defined for the last floor in the formwork plan drawing sheets are drawn on one sheet. I tried closing and locking the .

 

[yildiz50]

When I define a linear load on the 1st floor slabs, I see from the reports that the same load affects the slabs in this layer, even though my inclined layer is closed.

 

[yildiz50]

When I define a linear load on the 1st floor tiles, I see from the reports that the same load affects the tiles in this layer even though my inclined layer is turned off. Even though I delete and try again, it still affects [/color] on the upper elevation beam .I couldn't find a solution.

I meant to say that it also affects the flooring on the upper level. I wrote a beam.

 

[Levent Özpak]

When I define a linear load on the 1st floor slabs, I see from the reports that the same load affects the slabs in this layer even though my inclined layer is closed. and linear loads are given according to the coordinate plane on the entered floor, not according to the element. Therefore, closing the layers does not change the result. The slab loads will affect all slabs in the relevant plane. As a solution, you can increase the fixed and live loads of the slabs.

 

[yildiz50]

Thank you so much.

 

[ryildiz]

Re: It would be nice if ide 7 also had this feature

Program "Show/hide beam wall load" It would be great if the option was added and we could see all the wall loads we entered (on a floor basis) at the same time. It takes time to get on top of each beam and look at the wall load, and we can sometimes overlook it. Thank you for your interest and interest and I wish you success in your work.

Hello, You can view the wall loads on the beam by marking the Loads line in the Structure Tree in the perspective window and selecting the Load types by selecting the wall load. If you are talking about a different representation, could you elaborate with an example image? Good work

Mr. Levent, the display I mentioned is as in the attached picture. Good work.