German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7
- Thread starter Ismail Hakki Besler
- Start date
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hello Nedim, Is it because the "block" command you asked is not blocking is not active for Revision cloud?"NYILMAZ":20dpbr6a" said:Cannot block Revision cloud (mu?)
Yes, it is not active and it does not block when you select the objects that contain the revision cloud and block them."HakanŞahin":1sugc92m" said:Hello Nedim, Is the "block" command you asked about not blocking not active for the Revision cloud?"NYILMAZ":1sugc92m" said:Unable to block revision cloud. (mu?)
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hi, disable the "Master plan settings/Retrieve selected objects option" and get the mold plan. Good work"KUBA2009":2p89n9sn" said:I can import all the drawings in the attached project, but I can't import the mold plan, where is the problem, I couldn't find it ?
I briefly shared in the architectural part, but there was no reaction.
Hello, dear concerned. wrep I shared a few problems in the comments and questions section about the use of architecture 7. I think there is no interest there. On 29.05.2012, that is, 21 days ago, I conveyed that a domain account could not be made in wrep, but I guess this problem was not looked at in the new version. Scanning route operations cannot be performed based on the domain account. While another friend of mine is using it. I need to operate with a domain account, scan, command in another project, but I can't."KUBA2009":2nb8zyp9" said:Cannot calculate the area in ideCAD Wrep 7.016. After clicking the first point, we cannot continue.
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hello, I shared a few problems in
All messages are read and the content of the messages is evaluated, regardless of the architectural or static forum. Good work"KUBA2009":21ehmf0d" said:wrep in the comments section about the use of architecture 7, but I think there is no interest there.
HakanŞahin
Administrator
"Oznb":23vhfjc6" said:in version 7.017. After selecting the object, pressing the esc key seems to be selected and the selection is canceled when the screen is zoomed in. I didn't have such a problem in the old version. What should I do. There is no problem. There may be a display problem. Have you made any changes regarding the video card? It may be necessary to update the video card drivers. It may be related to the project settings. For example, you can open a new project with the template project and try it... If the problem is related to the project, you can attach the project file to the message .
"Admin":2sb20vwt" said:ideCAD WREP program is prepared to be used to print out existing projects.
thanks for your interest . Since no information was given in the architectural part, I had to write it here. and the answer came, thanks."HakanŞahin":1omt3cvn" said:Hi, I shared a few problems inArchitecture or static forum All messages are read regardless of the difference and the content of the messages is evaluated. Good work"KUBA2009":1omt3cvn" said:wrep in the comments and questions section about the use of architecture 7, but I guess there is no interest there.
hi, i searched the forum but still couldn't find a clear answer. Is there any harm in making a pile+flat in the raft foundation design? There is a difference of 20 tons of iron between the pleated+flat design and the flat designs on top and bottom. When designing with pleats, does the program check whether there is a need for reinforcement in areas that do not have reinforcement at the bottom (the areas where the pillar is broken)?
Levent Özpak
New Member
Hi, the reinforcement type top+bottom reinforcement should be selected in the beamless raft foundation design. When the reinforcement type is selected as Flat+Pleat, negative moment in the support area and positive moment value in the span is checked. However, positive or negative moment can occur in any region of the foundation. Moreover, in the flat+pile option, the reinforcement design is made only according to the moments where the calculation axis passes. The moment values in other parts of the foundation not taken into account. Good work"jumboss":3uyh9ffi" said:hello, I searched the forum but still couldn't find a clear answer. Is there any harm in making the pile+flat in the raft basic design? There is 20 tons of iron difference between the pile+flat design and the flat one on top of the other. When you design with pillars, does the program check whether there is a need for reinforcement in areas where there is no reinforcement at the bottom (the areas where the pillar is broken) or not?
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hello, In cassette and rib flooring, the teeth expansions are based on the flooring names, the axles are not shown as you asked. You wrote a message to the forum about this subject; your request It was recorded at that time. Good work..."oya":25n9jevl" said:Can we see the axles in the cassette beam expansions?
hi guys, i had a question, we draw the beamless slab like a raft slab in idecad7 and solve it with a semi-rigid diaphragm, how should we determine the load coming to the corridor part in this slab that we just created in places like the corridor where different live loads should be taken, thanks for the answers in advance.
coskun3561
New Member
Hello there; I need 1/100 scale for basic application, column application and mold plans. However, I cannot use the drawing interface efficiently at 1/100 scale. Although I doubled the font size, some texts may remain small. Is there a more practical way to set this up? Or what route would you suggest I follow?