Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[NYILMAZ]

Re: It would be nice if ide 7 also had this feature

....... ..... Mr. Levent, the illustration I mentioned is as in the attached picture. Good work.

If I wanted such a request, I would have asked for something more visual. In the simplest terms, in the form of linear floor load It should be The geometric shape of the load will be visible form (triangular, trapezoidal, hollow etc.) and in a different color from the linear slab load It can be for example, it can even be a translucent vertical plane like in tiling.Are we exaggerating? Best regards...

 

[ryildiz]

Re: It would be nice if ide 7 also had this feature

............. ............... Mr. Levent, the display I mentioned is as in the attached picture. Good work.

If I wanted such a request, I would want something more visual. In the simplest terms, it should be linear slab load. The geometric shape of the load will appear form (triangular, trapezoidal, hollow etc.) . It can even be a translucent vertical plane as in tiling. Did we exaggerate? Best regards...

Mr. NYILMAZ Even this situation will suffice, he will meet our needs. Of course, the agha's hand can't be held It would be better if the valuable ide officials would not be content with this and add what you wrote. The best thing is to be able to see the walls in 3 dimensions. (different color according to their thickness) Regards...

 

[siromar]

Re: It would be nice if ide 7 also had this feature

............. ............... Mr. Levent, the illustration I mentioned is as in the attached picture. Good work.

If I wanted such a request, I would want something more visual. In the simplest terms, it should be linear slab load. The geometric shape of the load will appear form (triangular, trapezoidal, hollow etc.) . It can even be a translucent vertical plane as in tiling. Did we exaggerate? Yours sincerely...

You can already see that image If you say Loads - wall loads, you can see it on the 3D screen. If you take the wall loads from the inside, you will get a real spread load diagram (decreasing in the door and window gaps) and even the 10-dimensional walls in the semi-rigid solution are also linear The program will add a load to the tile, although there were errors on the wall loads on the tiling, such as over-loading, but I don't know if it was fixed in these versions.

 

[NYILMAZ]

Re: It would be nice if ide 7 also had this feature

You can already see that image Loads - if you say wall loads, you can see it on the 3D screen. You will get (decreased) in the door and window spaces, and the program will even add 10-inch walls to the tiling as a linear load in the semi-rigid solution, although there were errors in the wall loads above the tiling, such as overtaking, but I don't know if it was fixed in these versions

Dear siromar, I know what you are saying. .. But as you can see from the picture that Mr. ryildiz is talking about, what he is talking about is about the data entry screen. I also raised the bar in this framework. By clicking an icon show/close beam loads command I made a suggestion about seeing the loads without leaving the data entry screen.

 

[GökhanYILMAZ]

Dear Gökhan Yılmaz, *The warning about the stair reinforcement axles was not taken into account. Also, I think we've kept the forum very busy on this subject. Review your project in the light of the above information and finalize your project. Good work[/quote] Hello. I have a question about the ladder. I have defined MEsnets. I determined the supports attached to the slabs. However, since I do not define the stair axes, stair reinforcements do not appear in the reinforced concrete dialog. When I give ladder axes, this situation improves, but this time it says the number of MODs is insufficient. I increase the number of mods, but this time it says ANALYSIS cannot be done. Note: I'm using the semi-rigid diaphragm option and geometry control is fine.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Hello. I have a question about the stair. I have defined the supports. I have defined the supports that are attached to the slabs. it says the number of MODs is insufficient. I increase the number of modes, but this time it says ANALYSIS is not possible. Note: I use the semi-rigid diaphragm option and there is no problem in geometry control. You can also review the project that I linked to in my previous message on this subject:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[nahroyo]

hello everyone and good work. How can we do wind loading on high-rise buildings?

 

[Levent Özpak]

hi everyone and good work. How can we do wind loading on high-rise buildings... I couldn't find it in the program...

Hello, After calculating the wind loads acting on the floors, in the Analysis menu/Floor Parameters dialog, In the Wind-Earth tab, it can be entered from the Wind X and Wind Y columns.

 

[GETA]

In the attached project, I get a warning that the mixed system is selected and the ratio of the total shear forces to the total base shear force is less than 0.40. I believe that the number of curtains is sufficient in both directions. Previous similar high-rise projects did not have this warning. How can I fix it?

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[Levent Özpak]

I get a warning in the attached project -mixed system is selected and the ratio of the total shear forces to the total base shear force is less than 0.40. I believe that the number of curtains is sufficient in both directions, the previous similar high This warning would not appear in multi-layered projects. How can I fix it?

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

The size of the project file attached to the link appears to be zero bytes.Can you upload the project again and give the link?

 

[GETA]

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[Levent Özpak]

In the attached project -mixed system was selected and the ratio of the sum of the shear shear forces to the total base shear force is less than 0.40. I am of the opinion that the number of curtains is sufficient in both directions, the previous similar high How can I fix this warning?

In the project, the upper rigid basement floor number was entered as -3. In the program, the Alpha s control is made on the floor above the rigid floor. The basement curtains defined in the 2nd basement store a large part of the shear forces coming to this floor. However, since it is defined as a subbasement, the shear forces they receive are not used as shear force in alfs control. The rate of alfaS for each floor is printed in the Earthquake Regulation General Report. In this case, the project engineer used the initiative and disregarded the warning given by the program to the alfas situation on the floor without a basement curtain can decide whether to hash the system and what to get the coefficient R. Starting from your floor, the R coefficient can be decided according to the alpha ratios on the ground floor.)

 

[nitasltd]

HELLO, I HAVE A SYSTEM COMPLETELY CONSISTING OF CURTAINS AND BASED ON MATTE RADGE. I CANNOT FIND THE STAPLING CONTROL REPORT DESPITE ALL MY EFFORT REPORT IS EMPTY. I LOOKED AT THE COLUMN HEADING ON THE CONCRETE TAB, IT DOES NOT WRITE ANYTHING. RADIE IS NOT IN THE BASIC REPORT. I CAN'T FIND IT?

 

[zeki78]

Stapling control is done for columns. If there is no column in your system, stapling control is not performed.

 

[dexana]

Hello, I have a question that I am curious about. Even if it is not a very simple, very troublesome project, my support reinforcements are very high, like 7fi14 in my own wing. What do you think is the reason for this? Or is there a problem? After placing all the reinforcements on site, there is a problem at the concrete entrance and I am constantly warned about this...helpful I would be happy if you

 

[NYILMAZ]

hello, I have a question I'm curious about. Even if it's not a very simple, very troublesome project, my support equipment is very high, like 7fi14 in my own wing. What do you think is the reason for this? Or is there a problem? After placing so many reinforcements, there is a problem at the concrete entrance and I am constantly warned about this... I would appreciate your help

It is necessary to see your project. Generally, it may be due to the unsuitability of the selected carrier system. Columns in the same direction, insufficient curtains, rigid beams between columns, etc..

 

[nahroyo]

Greetings to everyone, I request the idecad authorities to automate the BELT BEAMS used in rib floorings...

 

[HakanŞahin]

Fixes reported in the forum and fixed in version 7.017:

The attached file contains angle dimensioning in the regular floor formwork plan. When I select all (ctrl + A) and copy (ctrl + c) program breaks. When I delete the angle dimensioning, the same problem does not occur. I tried to select and copy the angle measure in an empty project, it's fine (except ctrl + C command, the same problem was encountered when entering the clone command)

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

There is also angle dimensioning in the normal floor formwork plan in the attached file. Move this dimension and its objects. Dimensions are broken.

Why isn't 0,0 node captured even though the DN capture icon is active and the lock to D.point is on in the settings?

Hello, Why are the stapling circles of the corner columns on the raft different in the attached project? Because both the column dimensions and the raft thickness are the same. In my opinion, Up=b+h+d should be 135 cm with a useful height of 30/60 columns and 45 cm raft coming to the corner. 158 cm and 180 cm have appeared in the calculation of the program

 

[NYILMAZ]

I ran into a problem that I couldn't figure out how. When I open a file that I have saved and closed, all settings (especially color settings) are lost and changed. I am using background white settings. But when I open saved file the background comes up white, but it seems like in the settings of the background black file. Thus, all my pen thicknesses are ruined. Also in the attached project, there are curtains that are not selected when I say frets/select all I couldn't understand why. I can select and edit the unselected pitch alone.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Note: V 7.16

 

[HakanŞahin]

Hello,

I encountered a problem that I can't figure out how. When I open a file that I have saved and closed, all settings (especially color settings) are lost and changed. I use background white settings. But is registered When I open the file the background is white, but it looks like the background is black in the settings of the file, thus ruining all my pen thicknesses.

"Apply active pen and color" option in the "Load Project" dialog when opening the project Could it be left checked? The project is opened with white background

Also in the attached project, there are curtains that are not selected when I say curtains/select all. I couldn't understand why. I can select and edit the unselected pitch alone.

Those pitches are entered as reinforcement pitches. Therefore, the Buff pitch/Select All can be selected.