Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

"nitasltd":29if22ja" said:
Hello, in my project, the balcony slabs give an error. The slabs that do not fail on the ground and 1st floor give an error on the upper floors. I strengthen the faulty reinforcement axis as much as the missing reinforcement, but it still does not work. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at the problem. .
Hello, In the project, S21 slab can be consoled from the left side with both S19 and S23 slabs.To solve the problem of insufficient reinforcement in S23 slab, it is sufficient to determine the reinforcing axes of the S21 slab in the X direction separately for both adjacent slabs.(For S24 slab You can draw new reinforcement axes with the Draw Reinforced Concrete Calculation Hanger command in the Slab auxiliary toolbar in the program, and you can change the location and working distances of the reinforcement axis with the Change the geometry of the rebar calculation axis command. In the attached project, the reinforcement axes of the S21 and S22 floors on the 2nd floor were arranged as above.
 
Hello friends; 1-Does anyone design with beamless flooring? 2-Did you examine the "beamless tiled solutions" of the software? 3-Does anyone have work on earthquake calculations and punching verifications in the beamless solution? 4-What are the opinions of the experts who developed the software? I would appreciate it if you could share your thoughts on the issues listed above
 
Hello; In the project I'm working on, I determined the panels I created in the basement in short pieces ===> (the reason is the tiles of different sizes available in the architectural project). When I make a geometric control, it gives a warning that the curtain length cannot be less than 7 times the wall thickness, and these curtains will work independently of each other in terms of reinforcement. What I want to ask here is, is it possible to combine the separately defined panels? Or do we have a chance to determine a panel (curtain) with elevation differences in one go? I will be glad if you can help...
 
"sedatkuntas":1qulcu1w" said:
Hi, I determined the panels I created on the basement floor in short pieces in the project I am working on ===> (the reason is the corollas of different sizes available in the architectural project). When I make a geometric check, the curtain length cannot be less than 7 times the curtain thickness. In addition, these curtains will work independently of each other in terms of reinforcement. What I want to ask here is, do we have the opportunity to combine the separately defined panels? Or do we have a chance to determine a panel (curtain) with level differences at once? gaps can be created with the Door/Window command.In addition, the 1/7 ratio may not be taken into account in the perimeter curtains that do not continue to the upper floors.
 
"mehmetdindas":a0hfveil" said:
Hi friends; 1-Does anyone design with beamless flooring? 2-Have you examined the "beamless flooring solutions" of the software? 3-Does anyone have studies on earthquake calculations and punching verifications in beamless solution? 4-What are the opinions of the experts who developed the software on this subject?
 
Hello; "Hello, Kuranglez spaces can be created with the Door/Window command. Also, the 1/7 ratio may not be taken into account for perimeter curtains that do not continue to the upper floors." How to use the door/window command in 1.ide static, I've been looking at the program but I couldn't figure it out, I'd be glad if you could help... After determining the foundation in the basement, there are certain fixed loads acting on the basement floor specified in the architectural project (2 water tanks, one of which is 12 tons and the other is 4 tons). Can these fixed loads be ignored, or should they be entered as point loads? (When I want to enter as a point load, these loads remain in space due to their basic structure); Also, how should I enter the wall loads of 20 and 10 in the basement? (I want to enter as a linear load, but when I solve the foundation, the separation walls that I will enter as a linear load in the basement do not fit on the foundation or foundation beams, they remain in the void) --What should I do?
 
"sedatkuntas":36nz6bgv" said:
1. How to use the door/window command in ide static, I looked at the program but I couldn't figure it out, I'd appreciate your help...
-Click the Architectural Paln/Pattern plan mode icon from the Tools menu, Switch to architectural plan mode. -Click the Door/Window command from the toolbar. -Select the appropriate space in the Door/Window Separators and specify its dimensions, elevation and distance from the panel. *Place the space you selected on the panel object.
"sedatkuntas":36nz6bgv" said:
2. Another question I have; After determining the foundation in the basement, there are certain fixed loads acting on the basement floor specified in the architectural project (2 water tanks, one of which is 12 tons and the other is 4 tons). Can these fixed loads be ignored, or should they be entered as point loads? (When I want to enter as a point load, these loads remain in space due to their basic structure); Also, how should I enter the wall loads of 20 and 10 in the basement? (I want to enter as a linear load, but when I solve the foundation, the separation walls that I will enter as a linear load in the basement do not fit on the foundation or foundation beams, they remain in the gap)
Raft flooring without beams Loads on it can be entered using the Point and linear slab loads commands in the Raft Tiling auxiliary toolbar. If loads do not come on the foundation, there is no entry.
 
Why are TK25 and TK31 beams drawn with extensions as if they are cantilevers, although they are not cantilevers in foundation beam expansions. I need help .
 
"izmirlimuhendis":2f9r5slx" said:
why are TK25 and TK31 beams drawn as if they are cantilevers in foundation beam extensions, although they are not cantilevers. I need help.
Hello, TK25 and TK31 foundations are not drawn as if they are cantilever. TK25's reinforcements cut TK24 The reinforcement of the TK31 is also extended to the point where it cuts the TK32 (If it had been drawn as a foundation console, the part that looks like a console would have been given a separate foundation name.) Note: The foundations of TK24-25 and TK32-T31 can be drawn continuously. Reinforced Concrete/Parameters In the /General Reinforced Concrete Parameters dialog, type 30 degrees in the "Continuously accept beams with small angle difference between them line". For TK31 and TK32 to be drawn continuously, change the viewing direction of the TK32 with the Modify/Object Edit/Beam foundation/Specify Beam Foundation Direction command. Analyze and take continuous fundamental expansion The foundations of TK24-25 and TK32-31 will be drawn continuously.
 
Hello. I am a new member of the forum. I am also a new user in idecad. My problem is this: the bed coefficient is very high in my project. That's why I always did the basic design. However, it was very difficult to make a project again after years. I forgot most if not everything. I wasn't sure about the continuous base connections on a gradual basis. I would be very happy if a friend who has knowledge on this subject could examine the basic design in my project and tell me if I have any mistakes.
 
In the project I added above: The D4106 slab on the 4th floor ceiling and the DB08 and DB01 balcony slab thicknesses on the basement floor ceiling are constantly giving errors in the geometry control, I couldn't fix it. I even gave the floor thickness 25cm to try it, but it still didn't work. I think I have an error with these 3 tiles. It will be better if an eye sees it from the outside, I couldn't get out of the business. Thank you very much in advance for your help.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Hello Mr. Gökhan, Here are the situations we identified regarding your project: -It would be more appropriate to put a continuous foundation under the curtains on the ground floor instead of a tie beam. -Continuous foundations should be connected to columns and walls at nodal points. - The D01 and D08 slabs that you created on the basement floor ceiling should be created by giving an elevation on the ground floor. -Creating the P01 and P02 screen with the panel object may be more appropriate in terms of its basic definition. It would be more appropriate to arrange the reinforcement axles and working distances of the D04 slabs for each different angle. -There is no need for the raft slab edges defined for console slabs at the base of the ground floor. For the -Ni<0.6 warning, it would be more appropriate to calculate the wall area on the ground floor manually and enter it from the analysis menu floor parameters dialog. It may be appropriate to increase the column dimensions to satisfy the alphai<0.7 condition in the -1st layer. You can examine the attached project in terms of data entry.
 
Dear Emrah YILDIZ, thank you very much for your interest. You have been incredibly helpful. You are very fast :) I wish you success in your work.
 
Mr. Emrah It's true that the foundations should always be connected at the nodal points... Well, on the gradual basis, as was the project I sent. If I connect it to the node, the basement goes into the ground floor foundations. How will we overcome this?
 
"GökhanYILMAZ":3gbzlq58" said:
Emrah Bey Continuous foundations should be tied at nodes, right... Well, on a gradual basis, as was the project I sent. ] If it causes problems in terms of architecture, you may not enter the basis in the relevant direction.
 
Mr. GökhanYILMAZ Please review the support conditions of the stairs in your project. There are those who are not suitable in support situations. Since your stairs do not fit on the mezzanine beam, when you fix it by supporting the floor from the lower and upper floors, you may have a problem with your staircase and the floor it is supported on. let the koaly come
 
"unver":s9v5sfrx" said:
Mr. GökhanYILMAZ Please review the support conditions of the stairs in your project. There are some unsuitable support situations. Since your stairs do not fit on the mezzanine beam, when you fix it by supporting the floor from the lower and upper floors, there may be a problem with your staircase and the floor it is supported on. Koaly come
] Hello Mr. Ünver, in Gökhan Bey's project, the stair support conditions are arranged according to the solution independent of the structure. Therefore, the staircase will not have any effect on the structural analysis. Good work
 
Hello, Mr. Levent You say, "In Mr. Gökhan's project, the stair support conditions are arranged according to a solution independent of the structure. Therefore, the staircase will not have any effect on the analysis of the building.". I want to draw attention to; 1- The ladder is given as built-in from three sides, to draw attention to the fact that this situation does not fit the situation of the ladder in the plan. 2- Of course, it does not affect the analysis when the ladder is given independently. But since I know that even if it is given independently, the stairs and their loads should be given on the floor, beam, curtain, foundation and solved accordingly, I felt the need to write such a warning to my friends who are new to the program, as I thought it would be beneficial for them to question what they should question when starting from the beginning. (We, the users, do not know what the program does as much as you, the programmers, so if you warn us, we will not use it incorrectly.) Thank you for your sensitivity. Good luck with.
 
"Levent Özpak":2glnmjqk" said:
"unver":2glnmjqk" said:
Mr. GökhanYILMAZ Please review the support conditions of the stairs in your project. There are those who are not suitable in support situations. Since your stairs do not fit on the mezzanine beam, when you fix it by supporting the floor from the lower and upper floors, you may have a problem with your staircase and the floor it is supported on. Let's get Koaly
Hello Ünver, in Gökhan Bey's project, the stair support conditions are arranged according to a solution independent of the structure. Therefore, the ladder will have no effect on the structural analysis. Good work
I was just going to ask this. MEsnet conditions setting menu is not active in my project. I didn't know how to activate version 7 because I learned it in the previous version. There is a problem with my certainty supports and I am aware of it. I would appreciate it if you could help me on how this menu can be laconic.
 
Back
Top