Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[b.ersin]

When I enter the value of the bearing coefficient in the continuous foundation solution, the value in the soil survey does not save the soil stresses. It says that a 2b+z+3 storey building can have a ground safety value of 2.0 kg/cm2 and a bed coefficient of 50000 and it does not save my foundations at this value. It saves when I lower the bed coefficient. can you help with this.

 

[mhanifiata]

In single foundation and continuous foundation solutions, when the solution is made using soil safety stress control and earthquake loads, increased ground emn. It does it with the entered safety tension, which should be compared with the tension. what is the reason for this?

 

[mhanifiata]

I add jpg in case the screenshots are not enough. Best regards...

 

[admin]

The comparison is made for each foundation and for each load combination. The control of whether the soil stress of the relevant foundation is exceeded for the relevant load combination is made according to the increased safety stress if there is earthquake loading in that combination, or according to the non-increased soil safety stress if it is not (eg G+Q combination). Therefore, it is not a case that the foundations are always controlled according to the increased safety stress because earthquake calculations are being made in the project. While one foundation may enter a negative state from vertical loads, the other may enter from seismic loading. For this reason, the value printed at the beginning of the report is the (for informational) representation of the safety tension entered by the user, but on a basic basis, the control is done according to the algorithm I have mentioned above.

 

[mhanifiata]

thank you. I think it's understood, so I should write the confirmation (like repeating an order in the military). When checking a foundation, first of all, the load combination that creates the greatest soil stress is checked. If there is an earthquake, increased emn. ger is used, otherwise non-increased value... a look at each basis rather than an overview of the bases...thank you for the clarification...

 

[admin]

Let me give an example: Let our ground safety stress be 20 t/m3, Let the ground stress calculated from 0.9G +E1 loading on a foundation be 29 t/m3. Since there is an earthquake in this combination, the safety stress will be increased by 50% and the control will be made with 30 t/m3, 29<30 Our foundation will save for this combination. Let the soil stress calculated from the G+Q combination on the same basis be 22 t/m3. Since it is 22>20 (non-increased safety stress), the foundation will not recover. In other words, the control is not made according to the greatest ground stress, otherwise we would have checked according to 29 and our foundation would have been saved. For each combination, the verification is made according to the relevant (increased or unincreased) safety stress of that combination, if the stress exceeds the safety limit in any combination, an error is given for the foundation.

 

[ahmetkale]

I have a pool problem. I want to make a repository but not a console platform. Even though I entered the platform dimensions as 0, it still designs the platform. How can I cancel the console platform?

 

[nahroyo]

hello and greetings to everyone, how is the pleated design made on raft foundations? In the raft section of the reinforcement selection in the program, the reinforcement diameter is also selected for the pile, but so far, no pleated design has been created in my projects, but I think we can produce even more economical solutions if there is a pleated design... best regards...

 

[Levent Özpak]

hello and greetings to everyone, how is the pleated design done on raft foundations? In the program, the reinforcement diameter is also selected for the pile in the raft section of the reinforcement selection, but no pleated design has been created in my projects, but in my opinion, more economical solutions if a pleated design is used. we can produce... Kind regards...

Hello, Pleated design is not suitable for beamless raft foundations as it is made only for the reinforcement axis passing through. It may lead to erroneous results.

 

[b.ersin]

in the continuous foundation solution, when I enter the value of the bearing coefficient in the ground survey, the ground stresses do not save. The ground safety value of a 2b+z+3 storey building can be taken as 2.0 kg/cm2 bearing coefficient of 50000, it says, my foundations are at this value It does not save. When I reduce the bed coefficient, it saves. Can you help with this issue.

 

[HakanŞahin]

in continuous foundation solution, when I enter the value of the bearing coefficient as the value in the ground survey, the ground stresses do not recover. It says that a 2b+z+3 storey building can have a ground safety value of 2.0 kg/cm2 and a bed coefficient of 50000 and it does not save my foundations at this value. It saves when I lower the bed coefficient. can you help with this.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Fixes reported in the forum and fixed in version 7.016: *

there is confusion in the transition window between the new floors and drawings, believe me, sometimes I'm looking for 1 minute to find the floors, more practical, useful and simple There must be a method that we use last time, it is constantly changing places, and as a result, it gets messy. I think it would be more beautiful and useful if at least the floor plans were fixed and the drawings of that floor come first... with my best regards... I wish you success in your work and your attention. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . thank you...

*

I also think that it is not practical to switch between floors by clicking on the information bar at the bottom to switch floors. It would be nice if there was a column showing the floors, except for going through the top menu. We can see the floors in the diaphragms section of the building tree, but when clicked, that floor is not active.

*

when I want to move any item, after selecting the item, I zoom in and see the place to move it, and the moved item comes in a large size. I can't make a good move. What should I do?

*

My problem is about the ladder placement point, I remember that this button worked in old versions, but I noticed that it did not work in ide7, I am trying to place my ladder by adding unnecessary axes. I didn't have the opportunity to open a topic, I would appreciate it if you help, let's not bother every time

especially when watching the shell results in a 3d window, I don't understand why the elevation of the dome is changing.

*

More importantly, when you enter the column reinforced concrete and click show all floors, the program breaks.

*

Error occurs in staircase detail drawings when changing stair level.

* Help file has been written for ideCAD report * Other general improvements

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[nahroyo]

Thank you for considering our ideas and thoughts, I wish the idecad team success in your work.

 

[hakan_sb]

Reinforcement projects First of all, I would like to congratulate the IDEYAPI family, it was a very good work. However, there is an impression that the reinforcement details shown in the promotional images on the ideYapı homepage are given automatically by the program, but I think these details are created manually.

 

[HakanŞahin]

First of all, I want to congratulate the IDEYAPI family, it's a great work. However, there is an impression that the reinforcement details shown in the promotional images on the ideYapı homepage are automatically given by the program, but I think these details are created manually. Hello, The drawings on the page have been prepared with the concern of being complete and error-free as they may be examples for the application. We kindly request you to evaluate the drawings from this perspective. vertical expansions Column application plans Floor plans Processes requiring manual editing of drawings: Indication of tie rod locations and tie rod detail drawings Reinforcements for foundations with beam sheathing Good work

 

[nahroyo]

Good morning everyone, I have installed version 7.016 for a few days, but I just had a chance to look at it. I think there may be some problems with the slab loads or just a special issue for me. very meaningless values appear on program live loads, what could be the reason?

 

[HakanŞahin]

good morning everyone I have installed version 7.016 for a few days, but I just had a chance to look at it. I think there may be some problems with the slab loads or it may be just me. The program live loads seem to have meaningless values. What could be the reason for this?[ /quote] Good morning, The problem seems to be a problem of the project being worked on. If you add the data, we will analyze it.

 

[nahroyo]

good morning everyone, I have installed version 7.016 for a few days, but I just had a chance to look at it. very meaningless values appear on program live loads, what could be the reason for this?

Good morning, The problem seems to be a problem of the project being worked on. If you add the data, we will review it..

** I have uploaded the project, thanks for your interest...

 

[HakanŞahin]

Hello, The load library is corrupted in the project. Solution: 1. Open the project. 2. Save all files with copy to file. 3. Open a new project using the black or white template. 4. Import the block into the blank project with paste from the file. The problem will be heard. I am also attaching the corrected project to the message. I wonder if the demo and the normal program were run on the same pc? It may have been a problem due to the load library format difference.

 

[nahroyo]

Hi, The load library is corrupted in the project Solution: 1. Open the project 2. Save all files with copy to file 3. Open a new project using the black template 4. Paste from file block Import the blank project. The problem will be solved. Also, I am attaching the corrected project to the message. I wonder if the demo and the normal program were run on the same pc? It may have been a problem due to the difference in the load library format.

**thanks for your attention.. architecture demo is available on the same computer only it didn't run today... could it be a corruption due to this?