Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[Levent Özpak]

I am using CAD 7 in

in the project, beam reinforcements come out very often, overloading beams. can you help me if I send the project? Thanks in advance.

If you add the project to the message, the residents of the forum can express their opinions...

I compressed the project but it still says it's big. I can also send an e-mail to my friends who will help me.

You can upload the project to any site and give the link. For example

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[nahroyo]

I couldn't create the ladder in the picture.. can you help me?

Hello, the ladder can be created as in the attached sample project.

Mr. Levent, first of all, thank you for your interest... but I tried this method before, now I'm trying again, but I'm not successful... The step part with 2 piers is automatically formed as a landing and the staircase option is passive, what could be the reason for this?

 

[Levent Özpak]

I couldn't create the ladder in the picture.. can you help me ?

Hello, the ladder is attached It can be created as in the sample project.

Mr. Levent, first of all, thanks for your interest... I tried this method before, but now I'm trying again, but I'm not successful... The step section with 2 piers is automatically formed as a landing and the staircase option becomes passive. what could be the reason

Create the second field consisting of two steps in parts. In the example project, you can examine the closed areas created with the route command. Good work

 

[sidnehum05]

I am using CAD 7 in

in the project, beam reinforcements come out very often, overloading beams. Can you help me if I send the project, thanks in advance.

If you add the project to the message, forum residents can express their opinions...

I added the project link:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

I'm waiting for your help guys, thanks in advance. Thank you very much for your interest, Mr. Hakan.

 

[Levent Özpak]

I am using CAD 7 in

. Thanks in advance.

If you add the project to the message, the residents of the forum can express their opinions...

I added the project link:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

I'm waiting for your help guys, thanks in advance. Thank you very much for your interest, Mr. Hakan.

*Upper rigid basement floor number in Analysis Settings in the Project 1. Since there is no perimeter curtain on the basement floor, it should be -2. Other than that, I couldn't see any problems with data entry. Good work

 

[sidnehum05]

Thank you very much, Mr. Levi. I am a new user of idecad 7. After checking my projects from the reports first, I give a design earthquake and have a performance analysis done, do you think it is the right solution? I can't get rid of the A1 irregularity in this project I uploaded, I guess because of the caliber of the building. When I do a performance analysis, a crash occurs? Is this because A1 irregularity is present on all floors? I would appreciate if you could help me how to proceed in this situation. good work.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[Levent Özpak]

thank you very much, Mr. Levent. I am a new user of idecad 7. After checking the projects I have done from the reports first, I give a design earthquake and have a performance analysis done, do you think it is the right solution? I guess because of its caliber. When I do performance analysis, collapse occurs. This is because A1 irregularity is on all floors. In this case, I would appreciate if you can help me what way should I follow. Good work.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Hello, A solution is not required in newly constructed buildings according to the performance analysis specified in Chapter 7. It is also possible to see the status of a newly built building after the performance analysis and to evaluate the project. I think there is no harm in arranging it accordingly. A1 type irregularity is an irregularity that affects the choice of calculation method. When dynamic analysis is performed This disorganization doesn't matter. Regulation Article 2.3.2.1 The failure of the performance level of the building is not relevant to this. Linear Performance analysis TDY. It is carried out according to the conditions specified in Chapter 7. The fact that even one element in the structure does not meet the necessary conditions gives the performance level in the collapse region. It is appropriate to examine the performance analysis results after having mastered Chapter 7 and according to the performance report details. Good work

 

[sidnehum05]

thanks a lot, Mr. Levent. I am a new user of idecad 7. After checking my projects from the reports first, I give a design earthquake and have a performance analysis done, do you think it is the right solution? I can't get rid of the A1 irregularity in this project I uploaded, I guess because of the caliber of the building. When I do a performance analysis, a crash occurs? Is this because A1 irregularity is present on all floors? I would appreciate if you could help me how to proceed in this situation. good work.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Hello, to the performance analysis specified in Chapter 7 on newly constructed buildings. A solution is not required. I think there is no harm in seeing the status of a new building to be built after the performance analysis and arranging the project accordingly. Type A1 irregularity is an irregularity that affects the choice of calculation method. This irregularity is of no importance when dynamic analysis is performed. Regulation Article 2.3.2.1 The failure of the performance level of the building is not relevant to this. Linear Performance analysis TDY. It is carried out according to the conditions specified in Chapter 7. The fact that even one element in the structure does not meet the necessary conditions gives the performance level in the collapse region. It is appropriate to examine the performance analysis results after having mastered Chapter 7 and according to the performance report details. Good work

THANK YOU SO MUCH LEVENT

 

[nahroyo]

hello everyone... I am working on the project that I imported as DWG, but when I import, the program imports it to a point far from the origin point. When I try to move it to the origin point, it says there are other objects in the same coordinate and therefore I cannot move it. What method should I follow?

 

[insmuh_gk]

It's pretty easy, first import it as you know, then create a block with the copy to file command, select the point that coincides with the origin as the base point, delete the plan you imported, bring the block back with the copy from file command, leave the base point at the origin. That is all! Take it easy G.KÖSE

 

[alfa]

If you move your work to the point (0,0,0) in autocad before importing your work into the ide, it will appear at the origin when you import it. You can directly adjust the scale.

 

[nory]

When there was no foundation, there was no problem in the project, but when the foundation was added, the reinforcement was insufficient error in the floors on the normal floor, when I deleted the foundation and re-analyzed, the same errors continued, why did it not give these errors when there was no foundation at first, but it turns out that the flooring also needs double-row reinforcement, but it is not solved in any way, how can we solve it? Could you please review the project in general. The project is attached

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[HakanŞahin]

There was no problem in the project when there was no foundation, but when the foundation was added, there was an insufficient reinforcement error on the floors on the normal floor. It turns out that it is necessary, but it is not solved in any way. How can we solve it? Can you help us, please review the project in general. The project is attached

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Hello, go to the 1st normal floor and do slab analysis. If you follow the slab finite elements, you can see that there are breaks in the slab contours. The reason is that the D12 console slab the slab edge element limiting its upper edge is not connected to the K29 beam... This is the cause of the problem you have experienced, it seems to be unrelated to the foundation Similar situation is also late for the lower edge border of the D08 console slab on the 4th normal floor virtuous Generally; you also control your other tile data. Good work

 

[nory]

thank you sir problem solved good work

 

[mehmetdindas]

Hello there; When I select the "3D Frame" option on the 3D Screen and select "Create Vector Drawing", a blank screen appears in some projects, and dashed and meaningless lines appear in others. There is no problem with Solid model or Hidden line options. Why could it be? I did not have such a problem in version 6.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Hello, Currently, vector drawings of solid model and hidden model images can be created. Added to our due diligence list. As a solution for now, we can save the project as Old version and create vector drawing in Ver 6.54. Good work

 

[alfa]

If you are using black in the background, select them all and make the lines white, if you are using white in the background, make the lines black. same thing was happening to me. I realized later... actually it is drawn every time..

 

[GETA]

Hello; 2nd row reinforcement drawing in beams is still done by hand. Is there any solution in the program?

 

[erbil]

thanks a lot, Mr. Levent. I am a new user of idecad 7. After checking my projects from the reports first, I give a design earthquake and have a performance analysis done, do you think it is the right solution? I can't get rid of the A1 irregularity in this project I uploaded, I guess because of the caliber of the building. When I do a performance analysis, a crash occurs? Is this because A1 irregularity is present on all floors? I would appreciate if you could help me how to proceed in this situation. good work.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Hello, to the performance analysis specified in Chapter 7 on newly constructed buildings. A solution is not required. I think there is no harm in seeing the status of a new building to be built after the performance analysis and arranging the project accordingly. Type A1 irregularity is an irregularity that affects the choice of calculation method. This irregularity is of no importance when dynamic analysis is performed. Regulation Article 2.3.2.1 The failure of the performance level of the building is not relevant to this. Linear Performance analysis TDY. It is carried out according to the conditions specified in Chapter 7. The fact that even one element in the structure does not meet the necessary conditions gives the performance level in the collapse region. It is appropriate to examine the performance analysis results after having mastered Chapter 7 and according to the performance report details. Good work

For type A1 irregularity torsional irregularity, try to keep this irregularity at reasonable values. There is no such thing as A1 type irregularity, but it is important that the value is reasonable in terms of the earthquake behavior of your structure.

 

[temucin]

Cassette and Ribbed Flooring In the attached file, there is a 3-storey reinforced concrete building whose flooring system is cassette and ribbed flooring. However, cassette or rib slab beam results were not displayed in the Reinforced Concrete/ cassette or Rib tab. Although there are 6 ribbed slabs out of 14 cassettes in the project, when we look at the Reports section, the calculation results of only 1-2 are given in the same way. Where can I access other floor beam results and where can I activate them? If you could help with this situation, I would greatly appreciate it.