German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish I think it is not practical to switch between floors by clicking on the information bar at the bottom. It would be nice if there was a column showing the floors, except for going through the top menu. We can see the floors in the diaphragms section of the building tree, but when clicked, that floor is not active."nahroyo":a4u11y2s" said:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7
- Thread starter Ismail Hakki Besler
- Start date
Levent Özpak
New Member
Can we introduce an L-section beam in
Currently, there is no possibility to define user-defined L-section beams. The program automatically finds the beam as a rectangular TL section according to the beam-laying relationship."Oznb":222jp99i" said:
The depth we have made for low laying in hollow block flooring is not enough for plumbers. I want to use L beam for hanging beam only in wet volume. Otherwise, if I hang it, I will have to make the beams deep. this time those beams are visible on the room ceiling. Think of it this way, I want to integrate a 25/50 beam to connect the low floor on a 1.5 meter section of a 5 meter 60/32 hollow hollow beam.
In terms of analysis, you can enter a 60x50 beam and define the moment of inertia and area values of the L section you want and run it as L section in the system. Of course, you have to manually correct the reinforcements according to the geometry of the beam in the drawings. But at least the reinforcements on the top line of your beam will be drawn properly.
is that what you mean by the situation in the picture? but of course it would be even better if idestatic offers the opportunity to define it as a single beam..."Oznb":xs5ewvm8" said:The depth we have made for low slab in hollow floor is not enough for plumbers. I want to use L beams to hang the beam only in wet volume. Otherwise, if I hang it, I will have to make the studded beams deep. this time those beams are on the room ceiling Think about it this way, I want to integrate a 25/50 beam to connect the low floor on a 1.5 meter section of a 5 meter 60/32 bi hollow beam.
I don't know how the system is set up, how the program sees it, how the calculation will be done. "But I personally do not approve of such systems. As you said, it is not very possible to solve the installations even with 30-35 cm low flooring in ribbed floors. Therefore, a lot of interconnected stud beams are formed. This problem, which is generally encountered in residential type buildings, is to create a rib floor system It goes against the logic of the system. The system is very difficult. It also affects the column arrangement negatively. Recently, such demand s have increased a lot. When the building inspection companies in our region (rightly) focused on the completion of the frames in the cantilever regions, ribbed systems began to be preferred by the architects. As an engineer, my counter suggestion is to instead of low flooring classic flooring in wet areas in such structures, and then to hide the installation with suspended ceilings in manufacturing . I don't know what my friends think, but now I try not to lay low in classical upholstered systems as much as possible. I try to explain the pros and cons to the client as well. (Let them not say that the engineer forgot to lay low :lol: ) Dear admin, I hope he will excuse my answer, which has nothing to do with the use of the program. I know it is a separate topic of discussion, but we engineers are pushing too hard on this issue. With love....."Oznb":2ylbd4et" said:The depth we have made for low slab in hollow floor is not enough for plumbers. I want to use L beams to hang the beam only in wet volume. Otherwise, if I hang it, I will have to make the studded beams deep. this time those beams are on the room ceiling Think of it this way, I want to integrate a 25/50 beam to connect the low floor on a 1.5-meter section of a 5-meter 60/32 bi-hollow beam.
yes, I mean making a single beam in this way... a friend named nyılmaz wrote that it would be statically objectionable. .. but the floor we will transport in this way is a floor between 1.5-3 m2 ... it will transfer the loads of the hanging beams to the hollow block. The main demand will be based on the hollow beam beam and the calculation will be made ... suspended ceiling solution is not very accepted, they do not want sound communication .. we make a lot of concessions as engineers and we are aware of this to architects. but I think that different solutions should be made to allow architectural freedom, of course, within the safety rules."nahroyo":vfi556zo" said:is that the situation in the picture you mean? If that's the case, I think it can be done... but of course, it would be even better if idestatics offers the opportunity to define it as a single beam..."Oznb":vfi556zo" said:The depth we have made for low laying in hollow slabs is not enough for plumbers. I want to use L beam for hanging beam only in wet volume. Otherwise, if I hang it, I will have to make the beams deep. this time those beams are visible on the room ceiling. Think of it this way, I want to integrate a 25/50 beam to connect the low floor on a 1.5 meter section of a 5 meter 60/32 hollow beam.
ahmetyilmaz
New Member
Good day, I have just started using the program. I have a question about the quantity report. When I receive the quantity report, there is a polygon in the width and length part of the flooring mold and flooring concrete. What is the reason for this? Thank you for your attention in advance :|
Levent Özpak
New Member
Hello, The geometric shapes of the tiles may not be rectangular. Therefore, the polygon expression is written instead of the side lengths instead of the longitudinal part. There is no problem here."ahmetyilmaz":2id76p6e" said:good day, I have just started using the program. I have a question about the quantity report. While receiving the quantity report, there is a polygon in the width and length section of the floor mold and floor concrete. |
Hello. When I choose 19 cm brick in the wall load in the beam settings, the result is 0.8 tf / m. However, my floor height is 4 m and my beam height is 50 cm, so my wall height is 3.5 m. The square meter of a 19 brick is 320 kg. It makes 320*3.5=1120 kg/m. That is 1.12 tf/m. Please correct me if I am wrong. I want to ask if the program does not calculate the wall load according to the wall height, or do we enter the value for the floor height other than 3m.
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hello, Settings/ Open the load library. Click on the line of 19 bricks. You will see that the height is defined as 2.5 meters. Either set this value to 3.5 or open a new line and define the load for the height of 3.5 meters. Alternatively, instead of using the load library, set the wall load as the value you want, in the beam settings You can also enter directly as "Defined load"."gripin":1sqmdg3b" said:hello. When I choose 19 cm brick for the wall load in the beam settings, the result is 0.8 tf/m. However, my floor height is 4 m and my beam height is 50 cm, so my wall height is 3.5 m. The square meter of 19 bricks 320 kg makes 320*3.5=1120 kg/m. So 1.12 tf/m. Please correct me if I am wrong. I want to ask if the program does not calculate the wall load according to the wall height, or we will enter the value for the floor height other than 3m.
Actually, one of the other features that should be done is that the wall height is automatically adjusted according to the floor height and the depth of the beam it is under. I don't understand why this is ignored when ideCAD can do so many difficult things."HakanŞahin":3j0s1wv2" said:Hello, open Settings/Load library . Click the row of 19 bricks. You will see that the elevation is defined as 2.5 meters. Either set this value to 3.5 or open a new line and define the load for a height of 3.5 meters. Alternatively, instead of using the load library, you can enter the wall load as the value you want, directly in the beam settings as "Defined load"."gripin":3j0s1wv2" said:hello. When I choose 19 cm brick for the wall load in the beam settings, the result is 0.8 tf/m. However, my floor height is 4 meters and my beam height is 50 cm. My wall height is 3.5 meters. The square meter of the 19 bricks is 320 kg. 320*3.5=1120 kg/m. So 1.12 tf/m. Please correct me if I am wrong. I want to ask if the program does not calculate the wall load according to the wall height, or do we enter the value for the floor height other than 3m.
sidnehum05
New Member
I am using ide CAD 7 in the project, beam reinforcements come off very often, overloading the beams. Can you help me if I send the project, thanks in advance.
Levent Özpak
New Member
Hello, The ladder can be created as in the attached sample project."nahroyo":33r12wro" said:I couldn't create the ladder in the picture.. can you help me?
HakanŞahin
Administrator
In
Forum residents can express their opinions if you add the project to the message..."sidnehum05":102k1gm8" said:I am using CAD 7 in the project, beam reinforcements come out very often, overloading beams. Would you help me if I send the project, thanks in advance.
sidnehum05
New Member
I am using CAD 7 in
I compressed the project, but it still says it's big. I can also send an e-mail to friends who will help me."HakanŞahin":3765iuao" said:If you add the project to the message, the residents of the forum can express their opinions..."sidnehum05":3765iuao" said:in the project, beam reinforcements come off very often, overloading beams. Can you help me if I send the project, thanks in advance.