Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

I'm using it now, the sound of the fan is heard from time to time and although it is less than before, there is still heating. Like if we change one more thing it'll be all right
 
I can't analyze this project... the problem stems from the geometry control. I tried hard but I didn't fix the geometry problems... it's just a work I did to improve myself.
 
"siromar":2pyj7feq" said:
I wanted to write one more thing I noticed. In semi-rigid diagram solution, the ide does not take the wall loads from the idearchitecture, it only sees the user-defined loads. Do you have any work on it?
Click to expand...
do you have any information about this? [ quote]Toolbar, can you right click, close the command line and try again, and let me know the result?[/quote] I didn't find any difference, the slowness is not usable anyway, it just seems like it's pushing the computer harder than 6
 
"nahroyo":m0a9jjg2" said:
I can't analyze this project... the problem is due to geometry control, I tried hard but I didn't fix the geometry problems... it's just a work I did to improve myself... it won't be applied anywhere...[/quote ] Since the columns on the 1st and 7th axis are given a height of -300 cm in the project, their height is perceived as zero. It would be appropriate to define the .floor as a single floor. The method given in the link below can be applied when entering the overlapping beams and floors.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
In this project, it would be more appropriate to make a solution by ticking Use response spectrum solution with eccentric moment loading in the diaphragm option in Analysis Settings. Also, from the features of the sloping floors at the upper level, I suggest checking -do not create rigid diaphragm- in the /static tab.
Click to expand...
 
"siromar":3c1wkira" said:
"siromar":3c1wkira" said:
I wanted to write one more thing that I noticed. In semi-rigid diagram solution, the ide does not take wall loads from the idearchitecture, it only sees user-defined loads. Do you have any work on it?[/quote ]
Click to expand...
We have added the situation you mentioned to our notes.
Click to expand...
 
"nahroyo":2jpni3op" said:
I can't analyze this project... the problem is due to geometry control, I tried hard but I didn't fix the geometry problems... it's just a work I did to improve myself... it won't be applied anywhere...[/quote ] It gives a geometry error because the 2nd and 3rd floor beams overlap.
Click to expand...
 
I think the heating problem was not completely resolved in the last version, I reinstalled the previous beta version and I continue. It doesn't have these problems.
 
"maniacal":1srsprrk" said:
constant basics make ridiculous mistakes, I click on one and the others give an error :(
Click to expand...
I agree. I also have this kind of nonsense. Radye says it's true even in one analysis, in another analysis It says wrong. :D does the basic solution when the additional reinforcements narrow their distances, but it reports even though the punching value exceeds the limit in the report.
 
When I try to create tiles in the attached file, different shapes appear in almost all tiles. I haven't been able to find the reason. Although I have re-entered all beams, columns and curtains, the same problem still persists. Also, I can't see anything in the perspective window. I wonder why?
 
"NYILMAZ":ucqc0zzh" said:
When I try to create a floor in the attached file, different shapes appear on almost all floors. I can't find the reason. Even though I re-entered all the beams, columns and curtains, the same problem still persists. Also, nothing in the perspective window Why?
Click to expand...
 
"SCETCHER":5920pklp" said:
"maniacal":5920pklp" said:
continually basics are giving silly errors, I click on one and the others give an error :(
Click to expand...
I agree. this kind of nonsense happened to me too. raft It says right in one analysis, wrong in the other analysis. :D does the basic solution when the distances of the additional reinforcements are narrowed, but gives a report even though the punching value exceeds the limit in the report.
Click to expand...
Can you send a sample project?
 
"Levent Özpak":kuct0kr2" said:
"SCETCHER":kuct0kr2" said:
"manyaksel":kuct0kr2" said:
constant basics get ridiculous errors, I click on one and the others fail :(
Click to expand...
I agree. This kind of nonsense happened to me too. Radye says it is correct in one analysis, even in basic, and incorrect in another analysis. :D does the basic solution when the additional reinforcements narrow their distances, but it reports even though the punching value exceeds the limit in the report.
Click to expand...
sends a sample project Are you?
Click to expand...
In the attached project, the raft foundation console length cannot be resolved up to 210 cm and the foundation height up to 120 cm. However, when we change the reinforcement intervals manually, it can report with 80 cm height and 180 cm console. However, it still does not provide stapling control.
 
I made the foundation height of the project I sent a while ago and made a raft basic analysis and the program froze. Then I pressed esc and the option to close the program appeared. I said shut down and restarted the computer.
 
"Levent Özpak":310vkus5" said:
"maniacal":310vkus5" said:
continually the basics show very stupid errors, I click on one and the others give an error :(
Click to expand...
Can you send a sample project?
Click to expand...
bet I was experiencing the error in the continuous foundations (like when we clicked on one, the other gave an error or the error was corrected, or when we double-clicked on the reinforced concrete continuous foundation dialog on the foundation beam that gave an error as a result of the analysis, the red color changed to black...) mostly in version 5.511. I did not encounter such a problem in 6.54.
 
"SCETCHER":2jsfdahk" said:
There is no problem when I save the same project as the old version (6.0012) and analyze in 6.54. It does the analysis.
Click to expand...
yes I also deleted 7.013, reinstalled 6.54 and reanalyzed and deleted the errors. I threw the foundation beam again and it was fixed :D The problem is in version 7.
 
IN THE ATTACHED FILE, I TRIED TO EXPRESSLY EXPRESS MY CONDITION... THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR HELP FROM NOW...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top