Greetings, Mr. Hakan, While I'm at it, let me report a situation. In the column parameters, the min stirrup spacing is set to 10 cm. Although the rebar diameter of Q8 and above is open in reinforcement selections, Q8/6 stirrups are calculated in the compaction region due to ductility. Why doesn't the program select a top diameter and increase the spacing? Am I making an incomplete definition?"HakanŞahin":3p5j8neg" said:The reason why the stirrup is 8 cm is calculated from the formulas given in tdy 3.1. In short, what is required is the range found from the stirrup area. The values of 10 cm and 30/3=10 cm are the upper limits. According to the regulation, the stirrup spacing can be reduced to 5 cm."cüneytazak":3p5j8neg" said:Hello. According to the regulation, the spacing of stirrups can be 10 cm in the tightening zone for a column with a short side of 30 cm. Is there a reason why the program gives 8 cm? If so, shouldn't it show in the error section? So is there a reason other than just saying missing equipment? Thanks. take it easy.
The minimum stirrup spacing in the parameters is given for the middle region. The interval value for the tightening region should be determined automatically according to the tdy. If you want to make the reinforcement spacing of the tightening zone 10 cm, you can cancel the use of 8 stirrups for the columns in the reinforcement selection and change it yourself."MaFiAMaX":2fadk3mx" said:Hakan Bey Greetings, By the way, let me tell you a situation. The min stirrup spacing is set to 10cm in the column parameters. Although the rebar diameter of Q8 and above is turned on in the reinforcement selections, Q8/6 stirrups are calculated in the tightening region due to ductility. Why does the program select a top diameter and increase the spacing doesn't it? Am I making an incomplete definition?"HakanŞahin":2fadk3mx" said:The reason why the stirrup is 8 cm is calculated from the formulas given in tdy 3.1. In short, the required is the spacing found from the stirrup area. The value of 10 cm and 30/3=10 cm is the upper limit. According to the regulation, the stirrup spacing can be as low as 5 cm."cüneytazak":2fadk3mx" said:Hello. In a column with a short side of 30 cm, the stirrup spacing may be 10 cm in the tightening region. Is there a reason why the program gives 8 cm? If there is, shouldn't it show it in the error section? So is there a reason other than just saying missing reinforcement? Thank you. Take it easy.
If you add a project, we can look at software or data entry."2nmuhendislik":14megyab" said:In the case of using reinforced concrete and steel systems together, I cannot perform a phased construction analysis, the program is interrupted. Is this situation caused by software or by installation? Is it a related problem?
For steel and reinforced concrete systems, for the next 9.00 version, the new earthquake Many new features will be added to the program within a plan program in terms of the requirements of the regulation 2016 as well as the requests and suggestions from the users.The 9.00 version is aimed to be released just before the new 2016 earthquake regulation comes into force."MaFiAMaX":1yu9hxgw" said:Hi, I searched but couldn't find it so I will ask two questions that may have been answered before. 1-When we get cassette or rib beam detail expansions Is it possible for him to write the numbers next to his name? In the metering table, the poses are not multiplied by the quantities, but the detail does not say how many of that rib beam is written. 2-Will it be possible to enter the tapes with chamfers as they are in reality?
Yes, I'm choosing the only option dwg/dfx/dwf, it doesn't work. So what does the p option do?"saridurmus":27f2j7fo" said:Greetings, drawings are received when you export, I guess you should choose dgw/dxf/dwf option, I think dwg/dfx/dwf is the only one You selected the option.
Hello, I think you are talking about lean concrete on the foundation. Lean concrete is a constructive element. It is not calculated. Drawing details can also be created using the two-dimensional possibilities of the program. Good work"cüneytazak":admi6yv5" said:Hello. How is the slab just above the continuous foundation in a structure with a continuous foundation defined? If it is received, how is it received? Thanks in advance for your help.
If the continuous foundations of ST04-06-08-10 on the Ground Floor are solved without connecting them to the S1-S2-S3-S4 columns that continue to the basement (for example, as a 1 meter console), the value of nki decreases. Another factor that causes the value of the basement perimeter curtain on the axis to be high."cüneytazak":kubqotvn" said:Thank you for your reply Mr. Levent. There is a lot of irregularity in b2 in this project. What do you think is the reason. Is there a mistake in the modeling take it easy.
Hello, Our status notes on reinforcement drawings of polygon columns It has been corrected and will be sent to you in future updates.(You have notified about this before.)"AYDIN":3q8byl7t" said:Greetings -cross columns have cross-ties, very messy reinforcements from bottom to bottom
The case of not drawing the beam line in the formwork plan has been included in our notes.-beam line does not appear on the low floor edge -
This situation has been included in our notes and has been corrected. It will be delivered to You in future updates.the upper reinforcement does not continue on the floor landing, although there is no level difference
The formwork is among our status notes regarding the miter length of the longitudinal reinforcement in its plan. Thank you for your notifications. cost Good work, good work[/quote]-The length of the anchor penetrating the curtain in the slabs on the wall edge is too long 1 m
Hello, With this command, as in version 7 You can only export the active window."oyuxel":3pyns68v" said:hello, what does the dwg/dxf/dwf single command do?
German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish