Opinions questions about the use of Reinforced Concrete Design

[NYILMAZ]

It would be better if you design the carrier system in a way that there are continuities. The building already consists of beamed flooring. Slide the two outer pillars up so that the stair outer axle is aligned with the pillars (curtain). Combine the two columns in the stairwell and turn them into a curtain. All columns are already lined up in the Y direction. No X-direction columns and curtains. So you have a curtain in the X direction. Consider Ibrahim's advice on beam sizes. You can also make the middle axle beams drooping. Increase the widths of the horizontal beams (50cm or so) Design the stairs and solve it with the system. Review slab loads at work. Do not neglect the wall loads on the floor on the floors. As Ünver said, the new regulations are valid now. However, I have made the above recommendations to improve your design knowledge. Check out the attached pictures, keep up the good work. N. YILMAZ .

 

[batuhann28522]

make the beams drooping in the sections with the gallery. Also, make the beams on the other side drooping like 25/60. Also, you do not need to enter the S11 column as a polygon. After entering the normal column as a log, correct it with the trimming method. In the modal analysis calculation method Please take the ritz vectors.

Thanks for your answers. Yes, it would be better if the beams were made pendulous, but since the formwork is closed later, this way and the columns cannot come to the same axis due to the architecture. What is the reason for the high reinforcement in that column? I can't fix that column. When I say V10 version, I couldn't see v10 version on idecad's own site, there is 8.62

 

[saridurmus]

In normal floors, the beams do not meet the beam sizing requirement, as there is a gallery on the ground floor. You need to provide this and if defining the S11 column as a polygon column is defined as a rectangular column, if you want it to be the same as the lower corner beam, trim it with the column trimming command.

 

[batuhann28522]

In normal floors, the beams do not meet the beam sizing requirement since the beams are completely a gallery on the ground floor. You need to provide this and if defining the S11 column as a polygon column is defined as a rectangular column, if you want it to be the same as the lower corner beam, trim it with the column trimming command.

Thank you. However, I did not succeed what I did with the beams.

 

[batuhann28522]

In normal floors, the beams do not meet the beam sizing requirement since the beams are all on the ground floor. You need to provide this and if defining the S11 column as a polygon column is defined as a rectangular column, if you want it to be the same as the lower corner beam, trim it with the column trimming command.

I solved the reinforcement problem, I think, due to stapling, such a reinforcement comes out. If I make the raft base thickness 80, it returns to normal. I think the number of reinforcements is due to the adjacent arrangement. Almost as much as the program fee is required.

 

[saridurmus]

Calculation according to TBDY 2018 after 01.01.2019 is required by law, I do not think that the relevant municipality will allow it. He wants it from 02.01.2019 in the town where I am. So you will solve it according to the regulation. take it easy

 

[nitasltd]

hi, while analyzing the attached project, it gets stuck on 11th floor slab analysis. Any chance of checking?

 

[canerozen]

Hello, I made a project with v10 static, there are definitely mistakes and deficiencies, I ask you to check it and I have a couple of questions. I could not see stirrup tightening in the columns, what is the reason? A pink line appears at the stud beam connections, I delete and define it again, but it does not change. Is this a sign that the connection is problematic?

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Hi, I made a project with v10 static, there are definitely mistakes and deficiencies, I ask you to check it and I have a couple of questions. I couldn't see stirrup tightening in the columns, what is the reason?

Hello, Actually all of them Your columns have been tightened. In the earthquake code of 2018, the length of the column lower and upper confinement zone was changed to 1.5 bmax. It was bmax in TDBY 2007. The reason for the lengthening of the columns is that the floor height is 295 cm (ln is 235 cm in many columns) and the column is the largest Depends on whether it is 65 or 75 cm Column wrapping zone length = 1.5*65 = 97.5 cm Due to the clean height of the column, there is no distance to the middle zone. A tightening zone and overlap zone are formed in the column. However, the maximum spacing of stirrups in the wrapping zone is 6*fi=6*1.6 = 9.6 The cm condition is not checked. Therefore, analyze again by making stirrups Ø10/10/10/10 on all columns.

Pink line formation in stud beam connections. or, I delete and define it again but it doesn't change. Is this a sign that the connection is problematic?

No, there is a height difference in the beams you mentioned. 30/32 beams are connected to 25/50 beam. We look at the formwork plan from bottom to top inside the floor. It is normal to see a beam line (beam line set to pink) due to the height difference.

 

[batuhann28522]

have a nice day. I need to perform a performance analysis of a entered project. I need to get a performance report. In the V10 version, however, when I click on linear performance analysis, the warning that you need to have the system analyzed is constantly displayed. I'm doing the analysis, it gives the same warning again, can you help me how to do it?

 

[servany2]

Good day. I need to perform a performance analysis of a entered project. I need to get a performance report. In V10 version, however, when I click on linear performance analysis, I always get the warning that the system needs to be analyzed. I am doing the analysis, it gives the same warning again, can you help me how to do it?

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[batuhann28522]

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

[/ quote] Can't I get a performance report, I have to give it to environmental urbanism, they want it because of urban transformation. Or if I can't get a report, how can I make a statement? I gave it in the previous version, they asked me according to the new regulation.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Can't get a performance report. Or if I can't get a report, how can I make a statement? I gave them in the previous version, they asked me according to the new regulation. Also, when will the program be updated? Do you have any information about risky buildings?

We are currently working on an update. This upcoming update will be available to users in the first week of March. There will be no performance analysis reports in this update, performance reports will be finished in the next update. We plan to finish the tests and update in April.

 

[eminekilic]

have a nice day. In the new regulation, is there a curtain requirement for hollow floor tiles? Is it not possible to design without curtains?

 

[YasinTezel]

Hello Only buildings with DTS 3 and 4 can be designed without curtains.