Download ideCAD Structural v10.93

Re: V1O itches a lot when I have the base I chose
"YasinTezel":2fehtlwa" said:
"servany2":2fehtlwa" said:
hello yasin, the project solved with v 8.62
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- The project solved with v10 and the base are available on the ground floor (when I want to add a column or add any reinforced concrete object) When I want, the entire mat becomes selected. There was no such thing in the past. This takes 2 minutes of work up to 30 minutes, it freezes all the time)
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
I think this is the situation you are talking about. In this version, the object below is shown in red to show which object was captured while drawing an object. This caused you problems with the large block file. I take our notes that this notation is not made in block drawings, in the case your friend mentioned, I think it hurts too much for me.
 
Re: ideCAD Statik IDS v10.03 Published I CREATED SECTION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION TREE FOR DOUBLE COMBINED SECTION I IN V10.03, BUT THE SECTION IS NOT LISTED IN ELEMENT DEFINITION. WHY IS THAT THANKS.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published
"mehmetkarasoy":2tmx8l5r" said:
I CREATED A SECTION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION TREE FOR DOUBLE JOINT SECTION I IN V10.03, BUT THE ELEMENT DESCRIPTION WAS NOT LISTED.
Hello, Check the material of the profile you defined in the section sections in the building tree. If the steel material is not defined, the profile you defined will not appear in the list of element settings such as steel column, steel beam. If the problem is not caused by this reason, you can add your project as a wetransfer link. We can check it out.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Hello; Since the horizontal plan section was taken during the architectural work in our project designed with İdecad Architectural 8.62, it seems that the file I opened with idestatic 10 was cut in the building architectural project in the 3d image configuration. The upper floors of the building cannot be seen in 3d. How can I fix this in idestatic10. Good work.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published
"afrasiyab45":2txznn5z" said:
Hello, In our project designed with İdecad Architecture 8.62, since the horizontal plan section was taken during the architectural work, in the 3d image configuration of the file I opened with idestatic 10 the building seems to be cut in the architectural project. The upper floors of the building cannot be seen in 3d. How can I fix this in idestatic10. Good work.
The horizontal plan section command in architecture is a command belonging to the architectural program. It is closed in the static program. You need to delete the horizontal plan section with the command.If you attach the project to the message or send it to [email protected], we can help you with the issue.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Hello, I am waiting for your comments and help regarding the problems in a project I have solved in the attached link. First of all, although I have solved according to Ritz vectors, I can't get over the warning that the number of modes is insufficient. Secondly, there is a problem with my relative floor offsets. I also have a curtain whose shear force I cannot recover. Building Importance Coefficient of 1.5 and DTS=1a puts a strain on the system. I am also waiting for your opinions and comments on the general solution of the structure. Thank you, good work everyone. Fırat TEKİN İnş. Eng.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released
"fırat07bfc":uxra24vw" said:
Hi, I am waiting for your comments and help regarding the problems in a project that I have solved in the attached link. I can't get over the warning that the number of modes is insufficient. Secondly, there is a problem with my relative floor offsets. I also have a curtain that I cannot recover from the shear force. The fact that the Building Importance Coefficient is 1.5 and DTS=1a puts a lot of strain on the system. I am waiting for your opinions and comments on the general solution of the building Thanks, good work everyone Fırat TEKİN Civil Eng
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Hello, Your Project 4 It consists of blocks, 4 of them are separate structures, including the foundation, I suggest you to solve these structures by completely separating them as a project. If we look at the plans of the blocks, there is no curtain in one block, the curtain ratios of the other blocks are not similar. A separate investigation is not made for each block in the curtain overturning moment controls. Therefore, when choosing the ductility level and R coefficient, you need to separate the blocks so that the shear overturning moment controls can be made correctly. Insufficient mods can also be fixed when you split blocks. Also, there seems to be a connection problem connecting the two blocks at a point on the dilatation edge, I will report this as a problem. The 70cm basement floor in your building has been defined, delete the sub-basement layer and increase the floor height of the upper floor. Define the 70cm-long earth curtains by leaving a 5cm joint without connecting them to the columns. In this way, you will cancel the rigid floor. This issue is fixed as you get Mod insufficiency issue in solving rigid basement floor. Relative story translation conditions have changed with TBDY 2018. If you have the chance to apply the wall connections as flexible joints (TBDY Figure 4C.1), you can increase the relative floor drift control limits by 2 times. Condition can be selected from analysis parameters. You can also increase the number of targeted mods.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released All right, Mr. Yasin, I will take your suggestions into account and find a solution again. I'll report back in case there's a problem, thanks, keep up the good work. Firat TEKIN
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published
"yusuf15hira17":197dt8bj" said:
hello, what does the error (ab) in the columns and walls on the beams mean?
TBDY 2018 Article 7.4.3.1 It states that you do not meet the conditions given in .b for beams attached to that wall and columns (Figure 7.7).
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released In the update coming with 10.03, shear forces are not multiplied by earthquake forces amplification coefficients. Municipalities do not approve the projects because this process does not take place. We hope that the issue will be resolved with the next update. Good work
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Hello; If you mean TBDY2018 Article 4.8.4, there is no such thing as you mentioned. The magnification is clearly stated in the reports. If not, please give details. Best regards.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released
"EmreBebek":22750fj0" said:
In the update coming with 10.03, shear forces are not multiplied by earthquake force amplification coefficients. Municipalities do not approve projects because this process is not realized. Future We hope that the problem will be solved with the update. Good work
As of v10.00, the shear forces are increased as necessary with the coefficient D. Therefore, in v10.03 D coefficient is automatically selected from Table 4.1 with reference to the building carrier system, it is automatically included in the Ra calculation according to 4.2.1.2. Depending on the case of a rigid basement in the building D=1.5 is automatically assigned in these rigid basements. This coefficient is not used for internal forces against ductile behavior as required by 4.3.5.2. According to 4.3.5.3, shear force is used in reinforced concrete elements, and in steel elements, it is automatically used as a multiplier for forces acting on joints. Review the ideCAD Static earthquake code compliance document to understand how the te operations are performed and how they are reported. Please attach here the document showing the project you claim not approved by the municipality and the reasons for disapproval they gave you.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published Hello, Make serious demands on the performance analysis of existing structures, an urgent update to the new version is required on this issue. I would appreciate if you are interested.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released
"cakilomer":34th91gk" said:
Hello, Make serious demands on the performance analysis of existing structures, an urgent update to the new version is needed on this issue. I would appreciate if you are interested .
We are currently working on an update. This upcoming update will be available to users in the first week of March. There will be no performance analysis reports in this update, performance reports will be finished in the next update. We plan to finish the tests and update in April.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published
"fathhh":3gwc71qx" said:
hello..In our first project we drew in 2019, although there were no errors in the beams as a result of the analysis, &quot;And&lt;=Vr I get an error saying &quot;There are beams that do not meet the condition. <Ve(tasarım kesme kuvveti). Kiriş etriyesini 8/20/9 seçilmiş ve bu etriye sol mesnet tasarım kesme kuvveti için yetersiz kalıyor. Bu durumda yapı özet bilgileri raporunda hata almanız normal. Betonarme ve kiriş kesme güvenliği raporunda koşul sağlanmamasına karşın hata vermemesi durumu notlarımıza alındı.

Sorunu aşmak için 1. kat K3 kirişinin etriyesini kendiniz fi8/17/9 yapın. Programın fi8/17/9 etriyeyi otomatik seçmemesi durumu da incelenmek üzere notlarımız arasına alındı.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released 1-In which situations are these combinations used/should be used? If it is necessary to define, how and on what basis will we enter the snow load and soil load values? Will there be a possibility to enter DD3 spectral coefficients for 2-lamda values?
 
Back
Top