Download ideCAD Structural v10.93

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released 1) ideCAD creates and uses these combinations automatically. 2) Made for the next update, currently in testing phase.

 

[Oznb]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released In vertical column expansions. If the column size is reduced, the reinforcement drawings appear as in the figure. Can you check.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published

In vertical column expansions. If the column size is reduced, the reinforcement drawings are as shown. Can you check it.

Hello, This is in our status notes.

 

[MrtGrsl]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

1) ideCAD creates and uses these combinations automatically 2) Made for the next update, currently in testing phase.

1) I didn't see it here, but is it viewed from a different place? Or do I need to define it? 2) Thanks for the info. Good work.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published If you mean soil and snow load, this situation is not among our notes, if it is foundation calculation, the combination shown in the regulation is symbolic. The program does it as described in the section of the forces to be transferred to the foundation of the regulation. These boosts cannot be done in combination. You cannot see these boosts in combinations. You can't make combinations like in that book. Because the regulation does not say to increase each element and the end effects of the element in the same way. I wish he had said so he wouldn't bother us. The regulation calls for increases in the MNT for buildings with and without basements, often not with the same coefficient. For example, the M and N increments of the walls are different in buildings without a basement, and in buildings with a basement, the coefficient is different for cases where the critical height of the shearing starts higher than the upper level of the foundation. If we assume that the regulation 4.10.3.2 does not exist, it can be done in combination. In summary, it cannot be done with a combination in buildings without basements, it can be done in buildings with basements if we accept a fixed coefficient. ideCAD calculates the foundation by multiplying the relevant effects with the relevant coefficients. The values shown in the program supply are raw values. If the regulation brings these increases in a way that they can be done with combination, we will change them to combination.

 

[MrtGrsl]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published

If you mean soil and snow load, this is among our notes. The program does it as it describes in the section on forces to be transferred to the foundation. These increases cannot be made with combinations. You cannot see these increases in combinations. You cannot combine as in that book. Because the regulation does not say to increase every element in the same way. I wish it didn't bother us. The regulation also says MNT for buildings with and without basements. most of the time, it wants to make increases that are not with the same coefficient. For example, in buildings without basement, the M and N increments of the walls are different, and in buildings with basements, the coefficient is different for the cases where the critical height of the curtain starts higher than the upper level of the foundation. If we assume that the regulation 4.10.3.2 does not exist, it can be done with a combination. no combination in buildings without basements It can't be done with a building. ideCAD calculates the foundation by multiplying the relevant effects with the relevant coefficients. The values shown in the program supply are raw values. If the regulation brings these increases in a way that they can be done with combination, we will change them to combination.

Thanks for the explanations, it was very enlightening.

 

[MaFiAMaX]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published

You cannot make combinations like in that book. Because the regulation does not say to increase every element in the same way. I wish it did not bother us. Regulation For buildings with and without basements, MNT also wants to make increases that are not always the same coefficient.If the regulation regulates these increases in a way that can be done with a combination, we will change them to combination.

In short, they know how to use a derogatory term for domestic software, but come on, today it's just general analysis Create a project with software! YOU CAN'T.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

You cannot make combinations like in that book. Because the regulation does not say to increase every element in the same way. I wish he had said so he wouldn't bother us. The regulation calls for increases in the MNT for buildings with and without basements, often not with the same coefficient. If the regulation brings these increases in a way that can be done in combination, we will change them to kmbination.

When it comes to words, they know how to use derogatory terms for domestic software, but come on, produce projects with just general analysis software today! I didn't get that book, but it's probably full of simple, superficial glosses as always. It may be useful to understand the logic of the business, but come and do a real, tangible business in the market in a limited time and for three cents, as described in this book. YOU CAN'T.

Even if you intend to make a project in compliance with regulations with foreign programs that are popular in the market and your time is unlimited, you will need excel programs that will compile the results you get. And you do dozens of projects and hundreds of combinations. But still, you cannot solve the basics exactly with these programs. Those who prepared the regulation really favored local programs. This will never happen with these foreign programs. If anyone claims to be, let him put the building geometry and building coordinates of a system with polygonal wall, shear and column, with basement and without beams, in the simplest floor plan, whose foundation is raft, but whose foundation will be solved separately by taking the superstructure effects. Let me explain here in detail why it is not and why it cannot be.

 

[MrtGrsl]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

If you mean soil and snow load

Yes, it was actually related to those parts of those combinations. Ismail Hakki Besler":1rjp25u0"]You cannot make combinations like in that book.[/quote] That picture is not from any book, by the way.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

If you mean soil and snow load

Yes indeed it was about those parts of those combinations.

You can't make combinations like in that book.

That picture is not from any book, by the way.

I meant the picture below, so I said 'you can't make combinations like in the book' Yes, it is not correct to make combinations for foundation design as in this picture, for buildings with basements.

 

[MrtGrsl]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

If you mean soil and snow load

Yes, it was actually related to those parts of those combinations.

You can't make combinations like in that book.

That picture is not from any book, by the way .

I meant the picture below, so 'you can't make combinations like in the book' Yes, it's not right to make combinations for foundation design like in this picture, for buildings with basements.

Thank you. I wanted to explain in order to avoid misunderstanding, when Erhan wrote it as a book.

 

[MaFiAMaX]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published

Thanks. I wanted to explain to avoid any misunderstanding when Erhan wrote it as a book.

I also mentioned this book , so I said "I didn't buy that book" I didn't mean your first post in the title

 

[batuhann28522]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Good afternoon. I wonder if we can make the view menus of idecad v10 version as in idecad 8?

 

[YasinTezel]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Hello Disable the Ribbon menu selection in the general settings dialog. Close the program and run it again.

 

[MrtGrsl]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published Hello, will the crossties wrapping the stirrups in the column application plans come with the update, is it among your notes?

 

[Mirza]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released As far as I understand, those who prepared the specification stumbled upon the sample application? It's a dramatic situation...

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published

Hello, will the crossties wrapping the stirrups in the column application plans come with an update, will it be among your notes?

It is among our subject notes. It will be added in future updates. It may not be in the first update.

 

[MrtGrsl]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published

Hi, I wonder if crossties in column application plans will come with an update to wrap the stirrups? Is it?

It is among our subject notes. It will be added in future updates. It may not be in the first update.

Thank you.

 

[fathhh]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Hello. According to TBDY2018, we tried to make a hollow block project static for the first time. However, there were too many reinforcement assignments in the columns, and we saw that there was no stirrup tightening in the joint areas. we got k error on the curtains. I wonder if we made a missing or incorrect information entry in the data entry, such as R coefficient, pursanta value in the columns, etc. We would appreciate it if you could help us to examine and see our shortcomings. Thank you in advance. The link is below.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

İHA_GÜNER.ide10.html

 

[YasinTezel]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published

Hi. According to TBDY2018, we tried to make a static ceiling project for the first time. However, there were too many reinforcement assignments in the columns, along with it in the junction areas. We saw that it did not tighten the stirrup. We got k error on the curtains. I wonder if we made a missing or incorrect information entry in the data entry, such as the R coefficient, the pursantage value in the columns, etc. We would be glad if you could help us to examine and see our deficiencies. /dosya.co/l22q9r65yvxd/SAL]http://dosya.co/l22q9r65yvxd/SAL[/url]İHA_GÜNER.ide10.html

Hello You have set the Ductility level to Limited. In rib systems, you need to solve with Mixed ductility level. You can review the explanation of Prof.Dr. Nuray Aydınoğlu. An update will come in the TBDY 2018 Wizard. Limited ductility level cannot be selected in rib systems. Since you took R as 4 and reduced it with 4/5R in your project, R = 3.2. are falling. Therefore, column and curtain reinforcements have increased and you are experiencing cutting problems. 4.3.4.6. You have to satisfy the condition Mdev >= 0.75 Mo. When you provide this ratio and choose the ductility level as Karma, you can get R as 5. 4.3.2.4. Clause conditions will be optional in the next version. In order to provide ductility conditions, my suggestion is to reduce the curtain ratio by turning the perimeter curtains into columns. Try to place 2 curtains in the middle area in the X and Y directions. In all beams, stirrups are tightened from the face of the column, only the beams are not tightened when they are stuck in the columns. There is no problem here, as the regulation states that the compaction will be made from the column face. If you're talking about columns. With TBDY 2018, the column length reinforcements are made in the middle of the column. Since the column wrapping area is made both in the middle region and at the lower and upper ends, the entire column is tightened. The wrap zone length at the lower and upper ends was changed to 1.5 bmax. (It was b max in TBDY 2007.)