Download ideCAD Structural v10.93

[fathhh]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

Hello. According to TBDY2018, we tried to make a hollow block project static for the first time. However, there were too many reinforcement assignments in the columns, and we saw that there was no stirrup tightening in the joint areas. we got k error on the curtains. I wonder if we made a missing or incorrect information entry in the data entry, such as R coefficient, pursanta value in the columns, etc. We would appreciate it if you could help us to examine and see our shortcomings. Thank you in advance. The link is below.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

İHA_GÜNER.ide10.html

Hello, you have set the Ductility level to Limited. In rib systems, you have to solve with the mixed ductility level. Attached Prof.Dr. You can review Nuray Aydınoğlu's explanation. An update on this will come in the TBDY 2018 Wizard. Limited ductility level cannot be selected in rib systems. Since you take R 4 and reduce it with 4/5R in your project, it decreases to R = 3.2. Therefore, column and curtain reinforcements have increased and you are experiencing cutting problems. 4.3.4.6. You have to satisfy the condition Mdev >= 0.75 Mo. When you provide this ratio and choose the ductility level as Karma, you can get R as 5. 4.3.2.4. Clause conditions will be optional in the next version. In order to provide ductility conditions, my suggestion is to reduce the curtain ratio by turning the perimeter curtains into columns. Try to place 2 curtains in the middle area in the X and Y directions. In all beams, stirrups are tightened from the face of the column, only the beams are not tightened when they are stuck in the columns. There is no problem here, as the regulation states that the compaction will be made from the column face. If you're talking about columns. With TBDY 2018, the column length reinforcements are made in the middle of the column. Since the column wrapping area is made both in the middle region and at the lower and upper ends, the entire column is tightened. The wrap zone length at the lower and upper ends was changed to 1.5 bmax. (TBDY was as much as b max in 2007.)

Yasin, first of all, thank you for your interest. When I selected the ductility level as mixed and removed the 4/5R option, there was a decrease in reinforcement in the s1(30/60) and s2(30/60) columns, but it calculates 24 22 reinforcements even though I increased their dimensions. By the way, we get an error that the ductility level Mdev calculation should be chosen as 4/5r and limited in the report, as you said in the report, that is, we chose mixed in hollow systems according to the regulation, how can we fix this? The final version is in the link, thanks

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

UAV_GUNER.ide10.html

 

[servany2]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published Ignore the ductility level limited text. Add curtains to the system or play around with curtain positions until you achieve 0.75 ratio so it gets more moment on the outer axles. Also, if you have to add curtains to the system, if the curtain size is larger than 150 cm so that the pz1 curtain meets the condition 4.2.3.4 (a), I would reduce this curtain if I were you, instead of using 4/5R

 

[fathhh]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published As you said, we tried to design the curtains from the corners of the building to the middle of the building as much as possible in the x and y direction. It only stayed in the x direction for the 0.75 rule, but it looks like it's because of the fraction. Column reinforcements have returned to normal, albeit a little, but we still have shortcomings (in beam shear safety, insufficiency of column reinforcement), I would be very pleased if you could examine it. Thank you. Good luck everyone.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[unver]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Hello

As you said, we tried to design the curtains from the corners of the building to the middle of the structure as much as possible in the x and y direction. Column reinforcements have returned to normal, albeit a little, but we still have some shortcomings (beam shear safety, column reinforcement deficiency) I would be very pleased if you could examine it. Thank you. Good luck to everyone.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Balanced project is attached Unver ÖZCAN

 

[inş.müh]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Good day, take it easy, as you can see in the attached image, although the y direction does not meet the overturning moment condition, there is no warning, there is a tick sign.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

good afternoon, as you can see in the attached image, although the y direction does not meet the overturning moment condition, there is no warning, there is a tick sign .

Can you add the project?

 

[inş.müh]

Re: ideCAD Statik IDS v10.03 Yayınlandı

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

good afternoon, as you can see in the attached image, although the y direction does not meet the overturning moment condition, there is no warning, there is a tick sign .

5% tolerance is entered in Analysis Settings. You do not see a warning or tick due to tolerance ratio margin. Tolerant condition value = 0.75 - 0.75 * 0.05 = 0.7125 < 0.72 no warning. If tolerance is removed (0% is given), a warning will appear. = 0.75 > 0.72 warnings.

 

[Oznb]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Sometimes we need to mirror the building in symmetrical blocks. It will make our job easier if the complete mirror option is added as in the option to rotate the structure. If possible, can it be added to the new version?

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

Sometimes we need to mirror the building in symmetrical blocks. It would be easier to add a complete mirror option as in the rotation option. If there is, can it be added to the new version?

Hello, you can select the whole structure on the Perspective screen with Ctrl+A and get the symmetry of the structure with the symmetry command.For more detailed information:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[yekmuh]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Is the date of the update after 10.03 certain? I know that an update with improvements for the cork flooring system will come in March. Is this date known? Thanks for your hard work.

 

[fathhh]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released When we want to turn any column into a curtain, do we need to delete the beams and slabs it is attached to and define a new curtain? so we couldn't do this by right-clicking on the column or I couldn't find it because it takes some time to do this one by one on the other floors. Is there such a method or is it something that can be added with updates as you say? Or can I learn how to do it? Thank you from now. Good luck with.

 

[YasinTezel]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published Hello We have request notes about converting columns to screen. Now you can edit as you mentioned.

 

[tevekkül]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019) Hello... In my attached project, with 10.03, the solution had a curtain rollover rate of 80% in the Y direction. I have updated to 10.05, it is below 40% and the ductility level should be limited.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019)

Hello... In my attached project, with 10.03, 80% curtain rollover rate in the Y direction in the solution I updated 10.05, now it gives a warning that it is below 40% and the ductility level should be limited.

Consider 10.05. Add a bulkhead in the X direction. Check apply item 4.3.2.4. Comprehensive about overturning moment control in 10.05 version A change has been made and an improvement has been made to Equations (4B.7) and (4B.2.4) used in the calculation of the base tipping moment

 

[Oznb]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Published *New* (14.03.2019) shaped curtain systems trim the curtain when the beam is entered as much as the curtain misalignment.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019)

The curtain systems in the figure also trim the curtain when the beam is entered as much as the curtain misalignment.

Hello, Give the eccentricity of the beam as 0.01 cm. The curtain will not be trimmed. This has been included in our notes. Thank you. Good work

 

[YasinTezel]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019) Hello, Thank you for your report. To solve the problem, try to connect the beam from the curtain end as in the 2nd model. In this case, there is no problem. 1. When you continue to the curtain axis as seen in the model, the curtain is trimmed.

 

[YasinTezel]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019)

Hi... In my attached project, with 10.03, 80% curtain rollover rate in the Y direction in the solution I have updated to 10.05, now it gives a warning that it is below 40% and the ductility level should be limited.

Hello, in the 10.05 version, the arrangement explained by İsmail has been made, take into account the 10.05 version. Since you have already made a solution to your project with a limited ductility level, there does not appear to be a problem.

 

[tevekkül]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019)

Hello... In my attached project with 10.03, the solution had a curtain rollover rate of 80% in the Y direction. I have updated to 10.05, now it is below 40% and it gives a warning that the ductility level should be limited.

Consider 10.05. Add curtains in the X direction. Check the Apply clause 4.3.2.4 option. In version 10.05, a comprehensive change was made regarding the tipping moment control and an improvement was made regarding Equation (4B.7) and (4B.2.4) used in the calculation of the base tipping moment

Since item 4.3.2.4 is DTS=3 in my project, this item is I understand that it doesn't need to be marked. Also, since BYS=7, I can make a solution with limited ductility. In this case, there is no need to add curtains in the x direction. Since I can't meet the 75% condition in the y direction, I can make the strength excess 2.5 and continue with a limited ductility level.