Download ideCAD Structural v10.93

[MrtGrsl]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published

Hello, in your notes, will the crossties wrapping the stirrups in column application plans come with an update? Is it?

It is among our subject notes. It will be added in future updates. It may not be in the first update.

Although stirrup and cross tie openings are 3 cm in the column application plans, the stirrup lengths are determined according to 3.5 cm. For example, 23 cm stirrups in a 30 column should be 24, but how can we fix this?

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019)

How can I get an analysis done according to the equivalent earthquake load method according to the new regulation?

ideCAD automatically calculates according to the Equivalent earthquake load method according to the new regulation. These results are used in the A1 torsional irregularity calculation, where the equivalent earthquake load must be used, B2 soft It is used in the floor calculation and in the magnification of the internal forces and displacements found as a result of the modal calculation. However, the structure only calculates the earthquake with the Mode combining method as the linear calculation method in the earthquake calculation. ] Why can't we choose? Shouldn't A1 and B2 be used to solve the structure without irregularities or even if it has BYS>=5?

It's not a requirement, we do it dynamically anyway.The dynamic method is much more accurate Because it is a calculation method that is guided by the regulation and gives economic results and can be used for any type of structure. Maybe in the future we will add the solution with the equivalent method as the calculation method. But not anytime soon.

 

[YasinTezel]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Published *New* (14.03.2019) As you said, Yasin Bey, I converted the floors on the ground floor to cassette, the final version is in the link and there seems to be no violation of the regulation as far as I have examined. In fact, if we solve the entire system as cassette flooring, the regulation tells me that you can solve high ductile without curtains, right? A curtainless solution can be made by choosing the A11 carrier system type at high ductility level. Your project meets the BMS condition.

 

[emir16]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019)

Hi. We tried to solve a static project with 3 floors, but on the Ground and 1st floor We could not solve the relative floor translation error. I would appreciate your help. Good luck. We need to raise it. I would appreciate it if you could help me..

 

[Medeniyetmuhendisi]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019)

Hello. We tried to solve a 3-storey static project. However, we could not solve the relative floor offset error on the ground floor and the 1st floor. I will be glad if you help. Good luck with.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

We need to finish the project by Friday. I would appreciate your help..

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

In the link above Mr. Hakan has explained the solution of the problem, there is such a problem in v10.05, I think it will be fixed in v10.06.

 

[YasinTezel]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019)

Hello. We tried to solve a 3-storey static project. However, we could not solve the relative floor offset error on the ground floor and the 1st floor. I will be glad if you help. Good luck with.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

We need to finish the project by Friday. I would appreciate it if you could help me..

Hello, I guess you didn't enter the building coordinates from the TBDY 2018 Analysis settings wizard. If you share the spectrum parameters so that we can control them, we will perform the control. The relative storey drift problem occurs in the Y direction. You can turn some of your columns in the Y direction. Also, there is no curtain in your building. You can add curtains in the Y direction. When you use the flexible connection method, you can double the relative floor translation ratios. It is preferable to use this option.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019)

Hello. We tried to solve a 3-storey static project. However, we could not solve the relative floor offset error on the ground floor and the 1st floor. I will be glad if you help. Good luck with.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

We need to finish the project by Friday. I would appreciate it if you could help me..

In your project, the coordinate information of the structure appears as the default coordinate information of the template project. However, the parameters entered for DD2 seem to be entered manually. I guess you didn't do the same for DD3, because DD3 Sds and Sd1 values appear to be zero. If you share the coordinates of the structure, we can check it.

 

[emir16]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019) First of all, thank you. I entered the values written in the ground survey report, but I guess it wasn't saved because I did it manually. ZE (DD-2) Bearing coefficient: 1000 tf/m³ soil bearing capacity: 17 tf/m² Latitude: 40.081975 Longitude: 29.517248

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released *New* (14.03.2019)

Thank you first of all. I entered the values written in the ground survey report but it was not saved because I did it manually ZE (DD-2) Bearing coefficient: 1000 tf/m³ ground bearing capacity: 17 tf/m² Latitude: 40.081975 Longitude: 29.517248

Hello, I made some adjustments in your project according to the coordinates information you provided and the bearing coefficient. The solution also affects the system. The element dimensions you defined in your project are sufficient. I tried to stick to the structural system you entered, and I controlled the relative floor drift by changing the directions and increasing the dimensions of the vertical bearing elements. Since the superstructure interactive solution affects the system, I also increased the raft thickness. Recommended structural system: Relative floor drift report with the proposed carrier system: If you wish, you can continue with the project I have added, or alternatively, especially in the mer You can try core curtain systems at once. If you want to use the carrier system you have determined instead of the carrier system I suggested, you can evaluate the application of the walls with flexible joints (TBDY Figure 4C.1). In this case, you can increase the relative floor drift control limits by 2 times. Good work

 

[MaFiAMaX]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released (14.03.2019) Hello, when will the retaining wall be updated according to the new regulation?

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released (14.03.2019)

Hi, When will the Retaining wall be updated according to the new regulation?

When will it be updated yet? There is no set date for the update. However, it will not be included in the upcoming update. The next update will include risky builds, while the next update will include linear performance analysis.

 

[miralay]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released (14.03.2019) A few points I would like to add; 1-) The edges of the raft spaces opened with the raft space command are not visible in the basic application plans. 2-) In the 3D viewing menu of the beam dialog, where the beam results are examined, sometimes unusual stirrups appear at the ends of the beams. 3-) The capacity design and diagrams in the column dialog where the column results are examined are opened very slowly. The program crashes when clicking the next steps in the moment curvature diagram. 4-) If short parapet slabs are defined as long in the program, the program does not divide the reinforcements. It draws much longer than 12 meters.

 

[fathhh]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released (14.03.2019) Hello. We solved our annexed project as cassette slab by providing minimum cassette dimensions and slab thickness conditions. however, the relevant municipality thinks that it is no different from the hollow floor (ribbed in one direction) flooring system, and that we should define curtains in the cassette system. However, we stated that the regulation tells us that cassette flooring, that is, double-sided gear flooring, can be solved with plate beam logic as high ductility. My question to you is, is the project that I have added a violation of the regulations according to the conditions I have mentioned. Thank you in advance.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[MaFiAMaX]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Published (14.03.2019) Hello, You can solve the cassette flooring system exactly as you specified, without curtain, within the scope of the A11 system. The regulation allows this. The person in the municipality does not have any legal basis, we, as the municipality, took such a decision, look, if this is the decision, it will take longer. But I don't think there will be such a decision. I just looked out of the corner of my eye; -Give all cantilever floor live loads 0.5t/m2. -The height of the rib beams is 32 cm, while the main beams are 35 cm. If the cassettes are to be filled with styrofoam and a flat mold will be installed, the heights of the main beam and rib must be the same. - If a heavier filler other than styrofoam will be used, add this load to the slab G load.

 

[YasinTezel]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released (14.03.2019)

A few points I would like to add; 1-) The edges of the raft spaces opened with the raft space command are basic application 2-) In the 3D viewing menu in the beam dialog where the beam results are examined, sometimes unusual stirrups appear at the ends of the beams. 3-) Capacity design and diagrams in the column dialog where the column results are examined are opened very slowly. When the next steps in the moment curvature diagram are clicked on, the program crashes. -) If short parapet slabs are defined in the program as long around the building, the program does not divide the reinforcements. It draws much longer than 12 meters.

1- Your request is among our notes. 2- There are cases that we have identified. If you want, I will forward your project to R&D. If you add the project you are experiencing, we will review it. 4- There is no general problem with this situation. If you add the project you have a problem with, we will review it. Normally, below 12m reinforcement length is controlled as in the following.

 

[fathhh]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released (14.03.2019)

Hi, You can solve the cassette flooring system exactly as you specified, without curtain, within the scope of the A11 system. Regulation allows this The person in the municipality has no legal basis, we, as the municipality, took such a decision, look, if this is the decision, it will take longer. But I don't think there will be such a decision. I just looked at it out of the corner of my eye; -The height of the rib beams is 32 cm and the main beams are 35 cm. If the cassettes are filled with styrofoam and flat formwork is to be installed, the height of the main beam and rib must be the same. /quote] Thank you for your answer. There is nothing that the municipality has stated as a decision we took between us, but in the A11 system, the phrase "buildings in which all the effects of the earthquake are met with reinforced concrete frames with high ductility level transferring moments" It was argued that the cassette floor is not suitable for cassette slabs, and since cassette slab is not a frame system (as they say, it is not connected with deep beams), we should consider it as a hollow block structure. Since there is no clear statement about the cassette in the regulation, it is misunderstood by the authorities as it only makes a distinction between one-way ribbed filled and unfilled hollow blocks. That's why I asked you if there is a place that is against the regulations and we missed it, thank you.

 

[YasinTezel]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Published (14.03.2019) Hello, in TBDY 2018, it has been specifically mentioned as unidirectional gear flooring in the sections about determining the carrier system type.

 

[fathhh]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Published (14.03.2019) This is how we tell Yasin to the necessary authorities. Because it is highly ductile, bidirectional (cassette) can be dissolved according to the regulation, but sometimes the relevant administrations feel the need to make "Comments" and make wrong directions. Thank you. Take it easy.

 

[yusuf15hira17]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Released (14.03.2019) Hello ; I saw such a difference in the regulation regarding loads that affect basement curtains. How should we enter the system according to the new regulation? I wonder if this has anything to do with the 1.4g+1.6q+1.6h and 0.9g+1.6h we entered in the previous regulation?

 

[siromar]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.05 Published (14.03.2019)

Hi ; I saw such a difference in the regulation regarding the impact loads on basement curtains. how should we enter according to the new regulation I wonder if this has anything to do with the 1.4g+1.6q+1.6h and 0.9g+1.6h we entered in the previous regulation?

Formulas given for the determination of H (soil load) in the load combinations you wrote. The horizontal load it will apply to the curtain means that it is in triangular or trapezoidal form = 0.2*2t/m3 (unit volume weight of soil)*3 m = 1.2t/m2. Of course, you will also add q live load to this calculation.