Download ideCAD Structural v10.93

[Zumre]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Hello, Sorry for asking a few times. Is there a date for linear performance analysis and retrofit updates?

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

Hi Sorry for asking a few times, is there a date for linear performance analysis and boost updates?

The current version is 10.03. We are working on 10.04. The issue you mentioned will not be in the 10.04 version. The planning of 10.05 has also been done.

 

[MrtGrsl]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published 1- Where is the lambda calculation in the relative floor offset or is it done? It should be done according to DD2 and DD3 in this case, but we choose only DD2, shouldn't this option be in the data entry? (TBDY 4.9.1.4) 2- If the weight of non-structural elements is greater than 10% of the total floor weight, is their participation in the analysis resolved or will it be resolved? (TBDY 6.1.3)

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published

1- Where is the lambda calculation in the relative floor translation or is it done? It should be done according to DD2 and DD3 in this case, but only We choose DD2, shouldn't this option be in the data entry? (TBDY 4.9.1.4))

It is an option in the analysis settings

2- If the weight of the non-structural elements is greater than 10% of the total floor weight, they Is the situation of participating in the analysis resolved or will it be resolved (TBDY 6.1.3)

This item is not automatically applied in the program.

 

[MrtGrsl]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

1- Where is the lambda calculation in the relative floor offset or is it done? In this case, it should be done according to DD2 and DD3, but we only choose DD2, shouldn't this option be in the data entry? (TBDY 4.9.1.4))

It is optional in the analysis settings.

2- If the weight of non-structural elements is greater than 10% of the total floor weight, is their participation in the analysis resolved or will it be resolved? (TBDY 6.1.3)

This item is not automatically applied in the program .

1- Does it automatically calculate the ratio of spectral accelerations, that is, the municipality asked us to analyze according to dd2 and analyze according to dd3. 2- This is the request of the municipality, and also section 6 calculations are requested. We are waiting for a solution, thank you.

 

[nurgulkaya]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published

1- Does the municipality calculate the ratio of spectral accelerations automatically, that is, the municipality asks us to analyze according to dd2 and then to analyze according to dd3 2- This is the request of the municipality, wall analysis is requested, and also section 6 calculations are requested. Therefore, our projects are waiting and we are waiting for a solution. Thank you.

1 - Lambda value that should be done for relative floor drifts = DD-3 Spectral acceleration / DD-2 is Spectral acceleration. The program determines it in the background for DD-3 according to the point you select from the map or the Ss and S1 values you enter. It uses it in the calculation of the relative floor drift limit value. The necessary tests for this case were carried out manually and with ETABS, there is no problem If the request is for this parameter to be printed in the reports, this request can be realized.If asked by the control authorities, you can check that this value is taken at the limit value as follows: * Shown in the optional report Come to the floor drift section. You can know the values of delta, i, max and hi from the parameters in the limit value (lambda*Delta,i, max)/hi here. Obtain the necessary coefficients for DD-2 and DD-3 from the AFAD map. Determine the Sae(T) value corresponding to the T (period) value you obtained from the program. It is simply as in the image below. You can calculate and check the lambda value. You can also demonstrate in this way if the inspection engineers ask. This situation has been noted to be clearly written in the report. 2- The phrase "walled analysis" does not constitute a statement that is clear and the actions to be taken are clear. The infill wall account and the Chapter 6 account are not the same. First of all, it is necessary to clearly understand what is being requested. In accordance with Chapter 6 clause 6.1.3, the masses of elements or equipment with a weight of 10% or more of the structure weight must be included in the system. In other words, the linear load must be acted correctly at the points where it actually is. Model the walls in 3D in the program or you can activate the automatic load calculation depending on the floor height, if you wish, you can enter it. Then, by entering the tiling properties, you can get the finite element width of 0.4 m from the static section. If you want to see the effect better, you need to decrease this range value. Then analyze. In this case, your wall loads will be modeled where they should be in the building. *** In addition, in Chapter 6, the required control equipment or wall is to determine the earthquake load and to affect this load on the element or equipment center of gravity. In current version you need to follow these steps to add this account: 1) Infill wall weight - Equipment Weight / Floor weight should be checked for each floor. 2) If it is greater than 10%, the earthquake load on the infill wall should be calculated and applied to the center of gravity of the infill wall as an additional load. *** Due to the plans of the upcoming releases, this job is pending in the list. We are working on 10.04, the issue you mentioned will not be in the 10.04 version. You can observe the results in later versions. Necessary explanations will be added in our compatibility files. Good work.

 

[miralay]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published

2- The phrase "walled analysis" is clear and does not constitute a clear statement of the actions to be taken. First of all, it is necessary to clearly understand what is demanded. According to Section 6 article 6.1.3, the masses of the elements or equipment with a weight of 10% or more of the building weight must be included in the system. That is, the linear load must be acted correctly at the points where it actually happens. model or you can activate the automatic load calculation based on the floor height, if you wish, you can enter it. Then you can enter the flooring properties and get the finite element width of 0.4 m from the static section. If you want to see the effect better, you need to reduce this interval value. Then analyze. In this case, your wall loads it will be modeled where it should be in the structure.

Related article k He says that besides his iron, its connection to the building should be taken into account in its rigidity. What I understand from here is that it will not be enough just to have an effect as a burden. In my opinion, what is meant here is that if there is a machine and equipment, it should be modeled statically in its connection to the building as well as its mass. Of course this is my comment. However, it is obvious that only acting as a burden is not enough.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published It is clear that the calculation of machine connections with rigidity properties should be done. This account will be added in later versions (after 10.07) within the scope of section 6 of the regulation. Here, 10% means the ratio of the weight of a single machine element[/u] to the total floor weight. Because the sentence is like this; 6.1.3 If the weight of the non-structural element or equipment is greater than 10% of the total weight of the floor where it is located, the element or equipment shall be considered as a part of the building carrier system...... continues. As of version 10.00, clause 4.9.1.4 is applied automatically and the empirical coefficient (lamda) used to limit the relative storey drifts, taking into account DD-3 and DD-2, is automatically calculated and taken into account.

 

[MrtGrsl]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

1 - The lambda value required for the relative story translations = DD-3 Spectral acceleration / DD-2 Spectral acceleration According to the point you choose from the map or the Ss and S1 values you enter, the program determines it in the background for DD-3 and uses it in the calculation of the relative floor drift limit value. The necessary tests for this situation were carried out manually and with ETABS, there is no problem. If the request is to print this parameter in the reports This request can be fulfilled. If you are asked by the control authorities, you can check whether this value is taken at the limit value as follows: * Go to the relative floor drift section in the optional report. Delta from the parameters in the limit value (lambda*Delta,i, max)/hi) here You know the values of ,i, max and hi. Get the necessary coefficients for DD-2 and DD-3 from the AFAD map. Determine the Sae(T) value corresponding to the T (period) value you obtained from the program. as it is. You can calculate and check the lambda value. You can also demonstrate in this way if the inspection engineers ask. This situation has been noted to be clearly written in the report.

First of all, thank you for your answer. Yes, I would appreciate if the spectrum values of lambda and dd3 are also printed. 1- For example, if we calculate in the 3rd floor X direction +5% part: lambda=0.00222/(16.92/3340)=0.438, but in hand calculation it turns out to be 0.419 as seen in the appendix.

Fill wall calculation and Chapter 6 calculation are not the same.

2-"also chapter 6 calculations [ /color] is requested"- I guess it is obvious that I am not saying it is the same thing. At least at this stage, it would be good if 10% control is made or the total weight of the wall is given. Good work.

 

[nurgulkaya]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Hello; 1 - As you can see, the 2nd digits of the numbers in the program are different after the comma. The reason is that you are simply calculating manually. It will not be sensitive enough as you are dealing with the data you get from the program reports. The process is done with high precision, but limited digits are printed on the reports as it should be. 2 - If they are not the same thing as you stated, it is a very big demand for you to automatically expect the infill wall calculation from the program. If you have such a request, you must fill in the bottom. In TBDY 2018, in any of the sections related to the new buildings to be built, the infill wall must be modeled, how it will be modeled, what the material model will be taken, etc. No information is available on the subject. In this case, by requesting an infill wall calculation from the program, according to which article of the regulation and what exactly are you requesting. Nowhere does the 2018 regulation say that infill walls will be modeled. It only tells how the machines and equipment and their connections will be modeled and under what conditions. This account will be added in future versions (later than 10.07). Here, 10% means the ratio of the weight of a single machine element[/u] to the total floor weight. Because the sentence is like this; 6.1.3 If the weight of the non-structural element or equipment is greater than 10% of the total weight of the floor where it is located, the element or equipment shall be considered as a part of the building carrier system...... continues. Therefore, if the weight of a single infill wall exceeds 10% of the floor weight, this is done. Moreover, the inclusion of infill walls in the system can be considered in the nonlinear calculation rather than considering the strength in the design. Because no matter how you model it, the infill should not try to pull within the plane of the wall. a - Infill wall model i) 3D- SAT ii) Single Pressure Bar iii) Double Cross Bars b) Material Model i) idealized elastoplastic model ii) bilinear material model iii) Multi-curved material model If you provide TBDY 2018 references for these cases, we will We can also process the request. Or what you mean by the expression of infill wall calculation, please give TBDY 2018 references, except for Chapter 6. If you express your request clearly, control authorities, municipalities, etc. Even the report formats can be prepared as they want to see by interviewing the institutions. *** As stated in Section 6, it is already in business as required by TBDY 2018. Our responsibility in this matter will be fulfilled, and as explained in this section, the Fie values affecting the infill walls will be calculated and the necessary investigations will be added to the program within the scope of section 6. *** However, if you think that the demands of the municipalities are not limited to Chapter 6, you should express this situation correctly so that we can understand you correctly and quickly find a solution to whatever your problem is with the municipalities. You will appreciate that it is not possible to produce a solution when the situation is not clear. Good work.

 

[yusuf15hira17]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Hello; With the new program, my analyzes are completed in a time ranging from 10 minutes to 40 minutes. I had ram upgrades, ssd upgrades etc. as I thought it was caused by my computer. Although I increased the speed of my computer considerably, there was no change in the analysis time. Is there a way to shorten this analysis time?

 

[MaFiAMaX]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published

Hi; With the new program, my analyzes are completed in 10 minutes to 40 minutes. I had ram upgrades, ssd upgrades, etc., because I thought it was due to my computer. Although I increased the speed of my computer a lot, there was no change in the analysis time. Is there a way to shorten this analysis time?

Since most static operations occur in sequence, the processor makes the biggest contribution to the speed. Since it uses RAM, you will notice the SSD difference when opening the software or saving the file.The processor that you can see the most benefit from at the currently affordable prices is the i9 9900K on the Intel side and the Ryzen 7 2700X on the AMD side.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

Hi; With the new program, my analyzes are completed in 10 minutes to 40 minutes. I had ram upgrades, ssd upgrades, etc. I thought it was due to my computer. Although I increased the speed of my computer considerably, there was no change in the analysis time.Is there a way to shorten this analysis time?

When determining the column wall dimensions of your structure; Uncheck the semi-rigid option in the upper left corner of the screen Uncheck the Uz Rx Ry Rz freedoms in the modal parameters and make the wall finite element spacing 1m. After deciding on the design and taking care of the deficiencies, when performing the final analysis, if the structure does not require semi-rigid, do not solve it semi-rigidly. If there is no need to perform a response spectrum analysis for vertical earthquakes, remove Uz from the modal parameters. Do not mark Rx and Ry in the modal parameters

 

[YasinTezel]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

Hi; With the new program, my analyzes are completed in a time ranging from 10 to 40 minutes. I had ram upgrades, ssd upgrades etc. Although I increased the speed of my computer a lot, there was no change in the analysis time. Is there a way to shorten this analysis time? If you want to shorten the analysis time, you need to upgrade the processor / motherboard. We recommend Intel processors. Expected efficiency cannot be obtained in AMD processors. Choosing the highest speed supported by your motherboard (MHZ) when choosing ram will increase the ram speed and therefore the processing speed.

 

[MaFiAMaX]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

Uncheck Uz Rx Ry Rz freedoms in modal parameters

İsmail Bey, even if you remove RZ in modal analysis It is as if they are activated again during the analysis and the calculations are made.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

Uncheck Uz Rx Ry Rz freedoms in modal parameters [/quote ] Mr. Ismail, even if you remove the RZ in modal analysis, it seems like it is activated again during the analysis and calculations are made.

We took precautions to change it in a conscious way. Click the modal dialog twice in a row and change it. And check to make sure it changed last time. If you do this in your temlate project and save it, it will open like this every time.

 

[MrtGrsl]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

Hi; 2 - If they are not the same thing as you stated, it is a very big request for you to automatically expect the infill wall calculation from the program. In TBDY 2018, in any of the sections related to the new buildings to be built, there is no information on the need to model the infill wall, how it will be modeled, what the material model will be taken, etc. In this case, you can request an infill wall calculation from the program and according to which article of the regulation. and what exactly are you requesting. The 2018 regulation does not say anywhere that infill walls will be modeled. It only says how and under what conditions the machinery and equipment and their connections will be modeled. This account will be added in later versions (after 10.07). Here I mean 10% ] is the ratio of the weight of a single machine element[/u] to the total floor weight, because the sentence is exactly like this: 6.1. 3 If the weight of the non-structural element or equipment is greater than 10% of the total weight of the floor where it is located, the element or equipment shall be considered as a part of the building structural system...... continues . Therefore, if the weight of a single infill wall exceeds 10% of the floor weight, this is done. Moreover, the inclusion of infill walls in the system can be considered in the nonlinear calculation rather than considering the strength in the design. Because no matter how you model it, the infill should not try to pull within the plane of the wall. a - Infill wall model i) 3D- SAT ii) Single Pressure Bar iii) Double Cross Bars b) Material Model i) idealized elastoplastic model ii) bilinear material model iii) Multi-curved material model If you provide TBDY 2018 references for these cases, we will We can also process the request. Or what you mean by the expression of infill wall calculation, please give TBDY 2018 references, except for Chapter 6. If you express your request clearly, control authorities, municipalities, etc. Even the report formats can be prepared as they want to see by interviewing the institutions. *** As stated in Section 6, it is already in business as required by TBDY 2018. Our responsibility in this matter will be fulfilled, and as explained in this section, the Fie values affecting the infill walls will be calculated and the necessary investigations will be added to the program within the scope of section 6. *** However, if you think that the demands of the municipalities are not limited to Chapter 6, you should express this situation correctly so that we can understand you correctly and quickly find a solution to whatever your problem is with the municipalities. You will appreciate that it is not possible to produce a solution when the situation is not clear. Good work.

Based on the above picture, they expect an account like the one in the picture below.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published 6.1.3 If the weight of the non-structural element or hardware is greater than 10 percent of the total weight of the floor,[ i] elements or equipment will be considered as part of the [/i]building structural system. In this case, the stiffness properties of the element or equipment mass and its connection to the building shall be taken into account in the earthquake calculation of the building carrier system. Reading the above article, the ratio of the weight of a wall to the total weight of the floor can be understood. However, if you forcefully understand it as the total wall weight of the floor, it is necessary to approach the subject as I explained below. With the explanations that follow this article, it is explained how much earthquake load this machine part and equipment takes. Already at the point where the ideCAD equipment is located, it can perform dynamic analysis by taking its real mass. This article also says that this F force on this element should be connected to the structure with a bolt or another connection and it should be shown that this connection transfers this load safely. If you make a joint on the wall (which is a flexible joint), you will not have to make any calculations if you use this detail provided by the regulation (Figure 4C.1). And thus, you eliminate the harmful effect of the walls on the structure. At the same time, you will prevent the wall from being damaged in the frequently repeated DD3 and DD4 earthquakes. The control to be brought with Chapter 6 is: In case the structural infill walls are built without leaving joints to the columns, it is ensured that the extra stresses brought on the columns due to the wall-column interaction during the earthquake are taken into account. The calculation of the walls by inserting them into the analysis system is extremely wrong. The truth here is to leave a flexible joint between the wall and the column, as stated in the regulation. No, if you say that I will make the walls without joints, we will add this account with an update in the future versions as stated in the 6th section. Already when the walls are made without joints, by limiting the relative floor offsets, you prevent the wall from adding extra impact to the columns and damaging the wall. If you have selected the jointless option with ideCAD and calculated the relative floor hoteling accordingly, you do not need to do any extra work.

 

[afrasiyab45]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released Hello, when I run the TDBY 2018 wizard after installing the v10.03 update, it gives the following error. I don't know why I am having such a problem. I would be glad if you can help me fix it. Good work.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released

Hi, I get the following error when I run the TBDY 2018 wizard after updating. What should I do.

Hi, when I run the TDBY 2018 wizard after installing the v10.03 update, it gives the following error. I don't know why I am having such a problem. I would be glad if you can help me fix it. Good work.

Perform the following steps, if you continue to have problems, call our Istanbul office and we will try to identify the problem by connecting to your computer with remote access. - ideCAD installation Make sure it's OK, you can try uninstalling and reinstalling the program. - Make Windows updates - Update Internet Explorer to the latest version - If you are using antivirus adblocker style security software, deactivate them and try again. - If there are add-ons installed in Internet Explorer, disable the add-ons. It didn't work after updating. Have you tried the wizard in versions prior to 10.03 and it worked fine?