Download ideCAD Structural v10.93

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New*
"YasinTezel":2viqumm3" said:
In our tests, sub-basement curtains are not included in the calculation. Sample report and project are attached. You can examine them from the pictures. A different situation Add your project if you have it. We can't detect your situation without adding your project.
it is not included in those controls, but it is included in the 4.3.4.6 control. I am talking about the control for being greater than 0.75 in the mixed system, it includes mdev> 0.75m0 in the mixed system
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New* I also made a check. No problem appears. Basement bulkheads 4.3.4.6. not included in the control. PZ02 screen is a screen entered in the x direction:
"ibrahim93":22rewubl" said:
I could not upload a file, can you send your e-mail address? //wetransfer.com/]https://wetransfer.com/[/url]
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New* -It still comes out as Z4. -Why is the tensile stress value so high, how can it be reduced?
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New*
"ibrahim93":b1b01oo3" said:
I couldn't upload a file, can you send your e-mail address? There is no such thing as not including the basement curtains in the analysis model. When you define the sub-basement curtains, it will have an effect on other curtains as they will be solved together with the system. Also, since you include them in the model, a reinforced concrete design will be made under the soil loads that you can add as required in all loadings or basement curtains. Since there is no system curtain, these curtains are neglected in the determination of the structural system and behavior coefficients of 2018 TBDY Chapter 4 when determining the structural system type. Also, if such a curtain is to be manufactured on-site in practice, you should include it in the model. The effects that may occur on the system due to this curtain have not been taken into account. please z. (Such as additional ground effect, short column etc.)
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Published *New*
"ibrahim93":6frnrdie" said:
https://we.tl/t-4xIb0Oet5H, I added this, can you delete the basement curtains and see the difference?
The presence and absence of basement walls in the system are two different situations. When you enter the basement walls, it contributes to the total overturning moment of the system and affects the system. If you want to ignore these basement walls as a rigid basement floor and these curtains will have the effect of a rigid basement floor in your building, If it is surrounded from the side and at the same time you are connecting the basement walls and the middle elements with a floor slab at this level, define a floor at the height of the basement curtain and put a rigid basement sign. In the stiffness reduction tab, enter a small value such as 0.001 by reading the earthquake loads stiffness reduction factor.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New* Hello; In order for the sub-basement curtains not to affect the system, it is necessary to make the production by leaving joints between them in a way that cuts off the connection with the column and earthquake curtains. If the production is not done in this way, it would be a mistake to think that the curtains will not affect the system in calculation and in reality. Best regards.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New*
"MrtGrsl":250d4w5e" said:
-It still shows as Z4 -Why is the tensile stress value so high, how can it be reduced?
Hello; Can you send your project for stress values?
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New* I understand, but in a basement building, shouldn't this inspection be done from the ground floor where the basement curtains end? Why do we include the curtains in the basement in this case? Isn't this control to compare the overturning moment of our curtains and columns continuing along the main building and to put curtains on the system at that amount?
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New*
"ibrahim93":2ujgz684" said:
I understand, but in a basement building, shouldn't this inspection be done from the ground floor where the basement curtains end, why include the basement curtains? In this case, we have taken this into account. Isn't this check
Yes, that's why I say you can do it.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New* If the bond beam dependency degree is less than 1/3 and the R and D values of the hollow curtain system are used (from the wizard, A12, A14, A21, A23 type carrier system selected), a warning can be issued and the system can be changed. It's not giving a warning right now.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New* When calculating the total overturning moment of the program, for Ex it only takes the sum of the overturning moment of the bulkheads in the x direction. It does not add the value of m 3-3, which occurs under the ex loading of the curtains in the y direction. While the curtain overturning moment totals should be 73,853 tm, the program shows 64.49 as Mdev value is less than 0.75. As far as I know in the regulation, the ratio of the total overturning moment of not only the bulkheads in that direction but also all the bulkheads to the total overturning moment occurring at the base must be greater than 0.75. The same is true for the Y direction. In v.10.03, the ductility level can be selected on a limited basis for the hollow system dts 1 and dts 2. The ductility level should be chosen limited is a wrong term in some cases. For example, dts 1 and 2 structures containing hollow floor slabs have to be solved with mixed ductility level.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New*
"Ismail Hakki Besler":2nxi0efj" said:
"ibrahim93":2nxi0efj" said:
I understand, but in a basement building, this investigation does not mean that basement curtains Shouldn't it be done from the ground floor where it ends? Why do we include the curtains in the basement in this case? Isn't this control to compare the overturning moment of our curtains and columns continuing along the main building
Yes, that's why I say you can do it.
Mr. Ismail, then the program ignores the basement curtains in this control is it necessary? will the fix come? will it stay like this?
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New*
"bkrclk":2xw0e7m1" said:
The program calculates the total overturning moment for Ex, it only takes the sum of the overturning moment of the bulkheads in the x direction. m under ex loading does not add the value of 3-3. While the total overturning moment of the curtain wall should be 73,853 tm, the program shows 64.49 as the Mdev value, which is less than 0.75. As far as I know in the regulation, the total overturning moment of all the curtains, not just the walls in that direction, is the total overturning moment occurring at the base. its ratio to the overturning moment must be greater than 0.75. The same is true for the Y direction. In v.10.03, the ductility level can be selected as limited for the hollowed-out system dts 1 and dts 2. The ductility level must be selected limited is a wrong term in some cases. dts 1 For example, structures containing hollow floor slabs with a ductility level of 2.
Yes, you are right, but that is not the main problem. pertaining to science. Anyway, this tipping issue will settle down after a while. The regulation article clearly does not say that this control will not be done in mixed systems. However, if you think that this check will not be done in mixed systems. You do not do this check at all and enter the R and D coefficients suitable for you as an engineer. The program does not prevent you from manually entering the R and D coefficients. Can you add this project that does not provide 0.75. In the situations we encounter, lowering it below 0.75 is usually a problem. Is there a group curtain in this project of yours, LTU etc.?
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New*
"ibrahim93":37s6u8me" said:
Mr. Ismail, then, shouldn't the program ignore basement curtains during this control. We can easily ensure that it is greater than 0.75 if we take into account the basement curtains. In the report
There will be no corrections on this issue. The program already ignores basement curtains. It performs this check from the rigid basement top to the ground floor. If your basement level is 1 m 1.5, whatever it is, it is more If you want it to be above, give the 1st basement floor level as the upper basement curtain elevation.No, if there is no basement, your building starts from the ground floor and you only have basement curtains, enter a floor below the ground floor equal to the height of the basement curtain and mark this floor as rigid.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New* Dear İbrahim93, If your system does not have a basement but you have curtains from the foundation to the basement, you should create the system as follows. The ground floor height should start from the top of the foundation level and be up to the ground floor slab. Again, according to the architecture, if you do not mark these curtains as basement curtain / curtain that does not continue on all floors when you enter the basement curtain, it will be like a curtain with a gap in your project, but this time it does not comply with the rules of leaving a gap on the curtains. If İsmail Bey tells you, if you want the overturning investigation to start after the flood level, he says, create a basement floor equal to the height of the inundation, and the program will calculate it. No, if you say that I do not enter the floor as a sub-basement curtain, it should be taken from the upper level of the foundation for rollover control. It says so in the regulations.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.03 Released *New*
"Ismail Hakki Feeds":29lkzxz1" said:
"bkrclk":29lkzxz1" said:
while the program calculates the total overturning moment, only x for Ex takes the sum of the overturning moment of the curtains in the direction of It does not add the value of m 3-3, which occurs under the ex loading of the curtains in the y direction. While the curtain overturning moment totals should be 73,853 tm, the program shows 64.49 as Mdev value is less than 0.75. As far as I know in the regulation, the ratio of the total overturning moment of not only the bulkheads in that direction but also all the bulkheads to the total overturning moment occurring at the base must be greater than 0.75. The same is true for the Y direction. In v.10.03, the ductility level can be selected on a limited basis for the hollow system dts 1 and dts 2. The ductility level should be chosen limited is a wrong term in some cases. For example, dts 1 and 2 structures containing hollow floor slabs have to be solved with mixed ductility level.
Yes, you're right, but that's not the real problem, it's about tipping. Anyway, this tipping issue will settle down after a while. The regulation article clearly does not say that this control will not be done in mixed systems. However, if you think that this check will not be done in mixed systems. You do not do this check at all and enter the R and D coefficients suitable for you as an engineer. The program does not prevent you from manually entering the R and D coefficients. Can you add this project that does not provide 0.75. In the situations we encounter, lowering it below 0.75 is usually a problem. Is there a group curtain in this project of yours? LTU etc.
I do not think that this control will not be done in a mixed system, I think it should be provided, I add curtains until that ratio is achieved. You misunderstood, Mr. Ismail. The only thing I'm curious about is why while checking the overturning moment in idecad v10.03, why does the Ex earthquake only take the moment value of the shears in the x direction? Do not the curtains in the Y direction contribute to the overturning moment for the ex loading? while the program finds the total overturning moment, it does not take into account the elements in the y direction for ex loading.
 
Back
Top