Download ideCAD Structural v10.93

Soil Safety Stress Increase Ratio Hello.. According to 2007 DY, we were able to increase 50% in A,B,C group floors. I couldn't see this option in Idecad v10. My question is: did I not see this option in the program or was this option removed according to the 2018 regulation?
 
Re: Soil Safety Stress Increase Ratio
"huseyinakkus56":3f1dzmar" said:
Hi.. According to 2007 DY, we were able to increase by 50% in A, B, C group soils. I couldn't see this option in Idecad v10. My question is: Did I not see this option in the program or was this option removed according to the 2018 regulation?
According to the 2018 regulation, this increase is not made.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Published After performing nonlinear analysis, there is no performance-related title in the reports, where can I read these results? more precisely, we can't even understand that we are doing this analysis, I couldn't find any data anywhere?
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released Bys=6 ike. I wonder how we will overcome the bys=5 because of the tower floor. Shouldn't it take the tower floor into account?
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released
"yusuf15hira17":z78u5mo1" said:
Bys=6 ike. I wonder how we will overcome bys=5 because of tower floor. Shouldn't it not take tower floor into account.
In v10.02, "attic" marking has been added next to the "rigid floor" marking in the Floor settings window. Mark this place on the last floor.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released
"yusuf15hira17":7omhrvu0" said:
Bys=6 ike. I wonder how we will overcome bys=5 because of tower floor. Shouldn't it not take tower floor into account.
Mark the elevator floor and come down from the top to the recording stage in the wizard, record and analyze.In this case, the program does not add the elevator tower to the total Hn.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released I think I can't do it, can you help me with the image Mr. Ismail. I would be very pleased. Thank you in advance.
"Ismail Hakki Feeds":39m902i4" said:
"yusuf15hira17":39m902i4" said:
Bys=6 ike. I wonder how we will overcome the bys=5 because of the tower floor. Shouldn't it not take the tower floor into account.
Mark the elevator floor and come to the recording stage from top to bottom in the wizard, record and analyze. In this case, the program does not add the elevator tower to the total Hn.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Published
"yusuf15hira17":3bqdr6db" said:
I think I can't do it, can you help me with the image Mr. Ismail. I would be very pleased. Thank you in advance.
"Ismail Hakki Besler":3bqdr6db " said:
"yusuf15hira17":3bqdr6db" said:
If bys=6. I wonder how we will overcome the bys=5 because of the tower floor. Shouldn't the tower floor be taken into account.
Mark the elevator floor and come to the registration stage from the top to the bottom in the wizard, record and analyze. In this case, the program does not add the elevator tower to the total Hn.
Sorry, I am not at the computer.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released I would appreciate it if you could help me as well. Performance analysis of the three works we have done before is requested, I have no idea how to do this due to some modifications.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released
"Zumre":10tl2imp" said:
I would be very grateful if you could help me. Performance analysis of three works we have done before is requested, I have no idea how to do this due to some modifications Now.
There is a push analysis option under the Analysis menu. After analyzing and designing the structure with DGT (for newly built structures), you are doing this SGDT step. Monday, friends will help you in detail.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released I didn't notice the roof tab next to the rigid floor tab. It solved my problem. Thank you for your interest, Mr. Ismail. By the way, thank you to a friend named Mafiamx.
 
GROUND SAFETY IS NEGATIVE G'+Q'-Ey'-0.3Ex'+0.3Ez COMBINATION MAXIMUM GROUND SAFETY STRESS IS 20.53 I CANNOT SEE THIS VALUE FROM THE ANALYSIS RESULTS, I CAN'T SEE IT FROM THE ACCOUNT REPORT. THERE IS MAX STRESS 15.02 IN THE ACCOUNT REPORT. There is a problem somewhere, I would appreciate it if you could take care of it.
 
Re: GROUND SAFETY NEGATIVE
"ottomancagatay":mkrjemf9" said:
G'+Q'-Ey'-0.3Ex'+0.3Ez COMBINATION, MAXIMUM GROUND SAFETY STRESSES 20.53 FROM THE ANALYSIS RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS RESULTS ,I CAN'T SEE IT FROM THE ACCOUNT REPORT. THERE IS MAX STRESSES 15.02 IN THE ACCOUNT REPORT. There is a problem somewhere, I would appreciate it if you're interested.
How many floors does your ground bearing strength give in the report. If this value is given as the Soil safety stress and for example, if its value is 15, your ground bearing strength is approx. It can be taken as 37.5. About 2.5 times. Is there a special reason why you use capital letters. Please do not use capital letters in your next messages. It makes it difficult to read and follow.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Published
"ottomancagatay":1yjandfp" said:
G'+Q'-Ey'-0.3Ex'+0.3Ez COMBINATION MAXIMUM GROUND SAFETY STRESSES 20.53 FROM THE ANALYSIS RESULTS I CAN'T SEE IT, I CAN'T SEE IT ON THE ACCOUNT REPORT. THERE IS MAX STRESS 15.02 IN THE ACCOUNT REPORT. There is a problem somewhere, I would appreciate it if you're interested.
 
Re: GROUND SAFETY NEGATIVE
"ottomancagatay":25lo1sl0" said:
G'+Q'-Ey'-0.3Ex'+0.3Ez COMBINATION MAXIMUM GROUND SAFETY STRESSES 20.53 FROM THE ANALYSIS RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS RESULTS ,I CAN'T SEE IT IN THE ACCOUNT REPORT. THERE IS MAX STRESS 15.02 IN THE ACCOUNT REPORT. There is a problem somewhere, I would appreciate it if you are interested. Combined values in buildings in accordance with earthquake code 4.10. Raft reinforcement calculations and soil stress checks are made according to combined values. In future versions, we can provide additional information such as raw results and design results for soil stresses as well as column beam dilogs.
 
Column shear force, shear Mdev and slab stress warnings Hello, I never encountered such problems when I analyzed my project in 8.62. Due to the change in the regulation, many accounts have changed, so many sections of my current project have changed. Normally, we prepared this project according to the old regulation before the New Year, but due to the changes in the architecture, we could not get it approved before the New Year and the municipality did not accept my old drawings and report as right. When I do my analysis, I cannot fix the errors in the report I mentioned in the title. (DTS:1 is chosen because the spectral acceleration coefficient of my project is 0.83, although the majority of the flooring system is hollow block, I could not choose the hollow floor slab because it does not comply with the regulation, select the beam system and select the ductility level in the following tabs of the wizard: Mixed, R Coefficients in X and Y directions 5 (A22) and analyze it. I did it.) When I apply the 4/5R formula in the article 4.3.4.2 in the regulation for rollover and analyze it, more errors occur on the curtains. I am waiting for your advice that I can only fix the mistakes I have mentioned in the regulation. In each analysis, I made my corrections and analyzed on my backup file. Otherwise, the program would crash and give different errors. Despite this, my file size is about 240 mb, I don't know if there is an anomaly here? It's Sunday, but I'm asking for help from experienced and interested elders who are available today, if possible. Thanks in advance.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: GROUND SECURITY NEGATIVE
"Ismail Hakki Feeds":3u4zjr9x" said:
"ottomancagatay":3u4zjr9x" said:
G'+Q'-Ey'-0.3Ex'+0.3Ez IN COMBINATION THE MAXIMUM GROUND SAFETY STRESS IS 20.53 I CANNOT SEE THIS VALUE FROM THE ANALYSIS RESULTS AND I CANNOT SEE IT FROM THE ACCOUNT REPORT. THERE IS MAX STRESS 15.02 IN THE ACCOUNT REPORT. There is a problem somewhere, I would appreciate it if you would be interested.
This project was examined in the technical service, and reported to R&D. There is no problem with the project. Combinations within the program are raw values. The values printed in the report are combined values in accordance with earthquake code 4.10 in buildings with basements. Raft reinforcement calculations and soil stress checks are made according to combined values. In future versions, we can provide additional information such as raw results and design results in soil stresses as in column-beam dilogs. they used to divide the carrying capacity by 3 and give us the value. The bearing capacity before dividing by 3 was the bearing capacity calculated according to 15 cm settlement, and when dividing by 3, we would have limited it for 5 cm settlement. Soil safety stress given by geotechnical engineer according to 16.8.3.2 is 200 kpa, soil bearing capacity is 500 kpa. bed coefficient 2400 kn/m3. There has been a bit of confusion for me, we are entering the bearing capacity with the new update, but it is compared as the ground safety stress in the calculation report, is it the bearing capacity that is called stress in the calculation report, I have a name mistake in the report, I could not understand here.
"2m project":3u4zjr9x" said:
"ottomancagatay":3u4zjr9x" said:
G'+Q'-Ey'-0.3Ex'+0.3Ez COMBINATION MAXIMUM GROUND SAFETY STRESSES 20.53, FROM THE ANALYSIS RESULTS, I FIND THIS VALUE I CAN'T SEE IT ON THE ACCOUNT REPORT. THERE IS MAX STRESS 15.02 IN THE ACCOUNT REPORT. There is a problem somewhere, I would appreciate it if you would be interested.
Hello; It seems that it gives the result you want when you download and analyze the file you added and get a report. Regards.
I didn't mean this part, I mentioned finite element raft results. Thank you for your interest.
 
Re: Column shear force, shear Mdev and slab stress stimulation Hello. Please read the answers given by Mr. İsmail Hakkı BESLER in the section titled "My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O" in the forum. Unver ÖZCAN
 
Re: SOIL SAFETY NEGATIVE
"ottomancagatay":wg5ij9p6" said:
Soil safety stress given by geotechnical engineer according to 16.8.3.2 is 200 kpa, soil bearing capacity is 500 kpa, bearing coefficient is 2400 kn/m3. I am confused, now we enter the bearing capacity with the new update, but it compares it as the ground safety stress in the calculation report. Is it the bearing capacity in the calculation report, or is there a name mistake in the report? I could not understand here. Does the program calculate the ground safety stress?
500 kpa given to you soil bearing capacity, if characteristic, divide this value (500/1.4) by 1.4 and find 357 kpa, that is, 357 kn/m2. In the program, make the unit kn in the soil bearing force field and enter this value. The tf/m2 equivalent of this value is 37 tf/m2
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Published
"Ismail Hakki Feeds":5k2e3zg0" said:
"Zumre":5k2e3zg0" said:
I would be very happy if you could help me. Performance analysis of the three jobs we have done before is being requested, I have no idea how to do this due to some modifications.
There is a push analysis option under the analysis menu. After analyzing and designing the structure with DGT (for newly built structures), you are doing this SGDT step. On Monday, friends will help in detail.
Hello, as you said, I met with idecad bursa and understood how this analysis was done and the results were checked from the vebinar training with their advice, but as far as I understand, we cannot transfer these results to the report, am I wrong now? because I couldn't find it in the reports
 
Back
Top