"ottomancagatay":3u4zjr9x" said:
G'+Q'-Ey'-0.3Ex'+0.3Ez IN COMBINATION THE MAXIMUM GROUND SAFETY STRESS IS 20.53 I CANNOT SEE THIS VALUE FROM THE ANALYSIS RESULTS AND I CANNOT SEE IT FROM THE ACCOUNT REPORT. THERE IS MAX STRESS 15.02 IN THE ACCOUNT REPORT. There is a problem somewhere, I would appreciate it if you would be interested.
This project was examined in the technical service, and reported to R&D. There is no problem with the project. Combinations within the program are raw values. The values printed in the report are combined values in accordance with earthquake code 4.10 in buildings with basements. Raft reinforcement calculations and soil stress checks are made according to combined values. In future versions, we can provide additional information such as raw results and design results in soil stresses as in column-beam dilogs. they used to divide the carrying capacity by 3 and give us the value. The bearing capacity before dividing by 3 was the bearing capacity calculated according to 15 cm settlement, and when dividing by 3, we would have limited it for 5 cm settlement. Soil safety stress given by geotechnical engineer according to 16.8.3.2 is 200 kpa, soil bearing capacity is 500 kpa. bed coefficient 2400 kn/m3. There has been a bit of confusion for me, we are entering the bearing capacity with the new update, but it is compared as the ground safety stress in the calculation report, is it the bearing capacity that is called stress in the calculation report, I have a name mistake in the report, I could not understand here.
"2m project":3u4zjr9x" said:
"ottomancagatay":3u4zjr9x" said:
G'+Q'-Ey'-0.3Ex'+0.3Ez COMBINATION MAXIMUM GROUND SAFETY STRESSES 20.53, FROM THE ANALYSIS RESULTS, I FIND THIS VALUE I CAN'T SEE IT ON THE ACCOUNT REPORT. THERE IS MAX STRESS 15.02 IN THE ACCOUNT REPORT. There is a problem somewhere, I would appreciate it if you would be interested.
Hello; It seems that it gives the result you want when you download and analyze the file you added and get a report. Regards.
I didn't mean this part, I mentioned finite element raft results. Thank you for your interest.