Download ideCAD Structural v10.93

Re: My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O Hello ; I am making a solution with high ductility level for the slab flooring project that I have solved in the system I sent in the attached picture, but as I add curtains, the total overturning moment/Mo rises above 0.75. I can't stay between 0.40 and 0.75. I need to delete my curtain so that I can stay in this range. Logically, as I add curtains, shouldn't I be able to meet the relevant requirement?
 
Re: My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O
"yusuf15hira17":30gs3ud2" said:
Hi ; I am making a high ductility solution for the slab flooring project that I have solved in the system I sent in the attached picture, but as I add curtains, the total overturning moment/Mo It goes over 0.75. I can't stay between 0.40 and 0.75. I need to delete my curtain to stay in this range. Isn't it necessary to meet the relevant condition as I add curtains logically.
Hello, It is natural that the rate will increase as you add curtains. Send your project to ideYAPI technical support and contact technical support by phone . We have detected a similar situation in the program, the situation in your project may be similar. If you send your project, we can forward it to R&D for testing. We are working on the subject. An update (v10.03) will come in the future. In the next version, explaining the situation instead of X Cross A statement will be written. Thank you for your interest.
 
Re: My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O If we look at it with straight logic, you are looking at how your system is. If it is less than 0.40, we can say that your system is a column-beam-framed system; but there is an error according to the screenshot you added.
 
Re: My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O Hello; Your Mdev/Mo ratios seem to be a little high, but it is quite logical that this ratio increases as the curtains in the system increase. If you want to keep the Mdev/Mo ratio in the range of 0.4 to 0.75, it would be logical to use less pitch. As Yasin said, if there is a situation that causes the Mdev/Mo ratio to be too high, that is a separate issue, of course. If you had added your model, I think a healthier interpretation could be made. Best regards.
 
Re: My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O
"yusuf15hira17":1yexabvr" said:
Hello ; I am making a high ductility solution for the slab flooring project that I have solved in the system I have sent in the attached picture, but as I add curtains, the total overturning moment/Mo It goes above 0.75. I can't stay between 0.40 and 0.75. I need to delete my curtain so that I can stay in this range. Isn't it necessary to meet the relevant condition as I add curtains logically.
We are working hard on this situation and other updates. It will be updated as soon as possible and automatic update Thank you for your patience, goodwill, understanding and support.
 
Re: My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O first of all, thank you for your work, it's a nice version. I think the shortcomings will be corrected over time. In v.10.02, even if the shear overturning moment ratio is 0.88 in a structure with a high ductile level, it does not give a warning (y direction). When I decode the structure as a hash, the program does not give any warning when it is 0.70 (x direction). Although dts 2 is in a structure of hollow floor slab, I can choose it as a system with limited ductility. As far as I understand, it should not be selected according to the regulation article 4.3.4.3. I may have misinterpreted the article. Another issue is that when I select the same project as mixed ductility level and do not use curtains, the program does not give a warning. What needs to be done to use punching reinforcement in columns with insufficient stapling? Curtain punch calculation is still not done in v10.02? To define l,u section curtains as a group, is it enough to just double click and type group1 or is it necessary to do something before? Does the program carrier system automatically take the effective absolute stiffness factors?
 
A question about İde v10.02 Hello, have you ever made a license project with v10.02? In the account report, 2007 regulation is written in some places. Has anyone had such a problem or are we making a mistake in data entry? I wish everyone good luck.
 
Despite V10.02 update, Mdev. no checks Hello. Even though I updated the program to v10.02, M does not control the overturning moment. And I get many errors. I wonder if I am making a technical error, can you check my project?
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Despite V10.02 update, Mdev. no controls Hello, although I updated V10.02, mTipping torque control says user control in the report. Am I making a technical mistake? I would appreciate your help, good work
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: A question about İde v10.02
"zekaikc":2cdtz074" said:
Hi, I wonder if I've ever made a license project with v10.02 version? 2007 regulation is written in some places in the account report. Did anyone have a problem or are we making a mistake in data entry? I wish everyone good luck.
Hello, There are some places that we found about the reports as 2007. It will be fixed with the upcoming update. If you report the situations you have detected in detail, we will see if there is a new status, you can add pictures from the report. Most of these cases are typo
 
Re: Despite the V10.02 update, Mdev. not checking Hello; If you mean the phrase "user control" in the image on the R selection page, this phrase says the sentence if you are careful: * According to 2 different rollover controls, if there is an error in 4.3.2.4 a and b, you should enter (4/5)*R instead of R. If you go to the rollover controls page in the optional report, you can see that these controls are made and if they do not provide a warning. For example, in your project, you have 1 curtain that is not provided in item a, so you have received a warning. In this case, you can make this control in the analysis in the new situation by adding the curtain that will work in the same direction to correct the situation in your only 1 curtain. Or you need to change your R value in the analysis settings as R=(4/5)*R. Good work.
 
Re: My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O
"bkrclk":sbxhof9t" said:
first of all, good luck with your work. I think the deficiencies will be corrected in time. In v.10.02, the curtain tilting moment ratio is high and the ductile level is high It does not give a warning even if it is 0.88 in a structure (y direction). When I solve the structure as mixed, the program does not give any warning when it is 0.70 (x direction). Although dts 2 is in a structure belonging to hollow floor, I can choose it as a system with limited ductility level. As far as I understand, the regulation article 4.3 It is necessary not to choose according to .4.3, I may have misinterpreted the item. Another issue is that when I choose the same project as ductility level mixed and do not use curtains, the program does not give a warning. What should be done to use punching reinforcement in columns with insufficient punching? Wall punching calculation in v10.02 Is it still not done? l To define u-section curtains as a group, is it enough to just double-click and type group1 or is it possible to use an i-section before? Do you need to act? Does the program automatically take the active rigidity factors of the carrier system?
is automatically taken in seismic load combinations as specified in the regulation. ---According to 4.3.4.3, hollow floors have to be used with curtains as a mixed system in DTS 1 and 2, you have interpreted it correctly. Curtain control is also included in geometry control and will be added over time. What needs to be done to use punching reinforcement in columns with insufficient stapling? It is stated that it will come in the next updates. Curtain punch calculation is still not done in v10.02? It is stated that it will come in the next updates. To define l,u section curtains as a group, is it enough to just double click and type group1 or is it necessary to do something before? check the header area in the drawings, if not, enter the header length from the reinforcement settings yourself. There was a topic answered by the brain of ismail, there is a detailed explanation in the forum.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O
"bkrclk":35vw0oxy" said:
first of all, good luck with your work. I think the deficiencies will be corrected in time. In v.10.02, the curtain tipping moment ratio is high and the ductile level is high. It does not give a warning even if it is 0.88 in a structure (y direction). When I solve the structure as mixed, the program does not give any warning when it is 0.70 (x direction). Although dts 2 is in a structure belonging to hollow floor, I can choose it as a system with limited ductility level. As far as I understand, the regulation article 4.3 It is necessary not to choose according to .4.3, I may have misinterpreted the item. Another issue is that when I choose the same project as ductility level mixed and do not use curtains, the program does not give a warning. What should be done to use punching reinforcement in columns with insufficient punching? Wall punching calculation in v10.02 Is it still not done? l To define u-section curtains as a group, is it enough to just double-click and type group1 or is it possible to use an i-section before? Do you need to act? Does the program automatically take the effective exact stiffness factors of the structural system?
- Studies on reporting the errors of the New Earthquake Code on the first pages of the report continue. You can see it as an addition in the next process. - Note has been taken to add to the TBDY 2018 Wizard. - Work continues for stapling controls. - It is enough to create a group name by selecting the curtain arms, entering their properties and giving a common name -Effective section stiffness factors are used automatically. You can find it used in the explanations in the reports. Good work.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released hello my questions are as follows: 1. when will performance and reinforcement analyzes come? There are many errors I encountered in the 2nd program, when will the program fully work? 3. Don't you really think you're still too late?
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Published Hello, what is meant by the new version's soil bearing capacity, is it the maximum load that the ground can pull with the factor of safety undivided, or is it the value given to us by the geological engineers and divided by the safety coefficients? Because it cannot be increased in the new version in case of earthquake. I didn't understand that part
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released
"Zumre":2k3wm2hs" said:
hi my questions are as follows: When will the 1.performance and reinforcement analyzes come? 3. Still don't you think it's too late?
1) Performance analysis (Nonlinear push analysis) is already available in v10.02. Retrofit will be discussed later. 2) Any errors you encounter are technical with project and screenshot send it to service or add it here and we'll fix it 3) We don't think it's too late except for retrofit
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Published
"nitasltd":1lbgvn37" said:
Hello, is it the maximum load that the ground can pull without the factor of safety, which is meant by the new version's soil bearing capacity, or is it the safety factor given to us by the geological engineers? Is it the value divided by its coefficients? Because it cannot be increased in the new version in case of earthquakes. I couldn't understand that part
In the past, where you entered the soil safety stress, the soil bearing capacity will be entered. This value is included in the soil report. You can think of it as 3 times the soil safety stress.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Published
"Ismail Hakki Feeds":3qlsk32x" said:
"nitasltd":3qlsk32x" said:
Hi, the ground bearing capacity of the new version is meant by the factor of safety undivided. Is it the maximum load that the ground can pull or the value given to us by the geological engineers divided by the safety factors? Because it cannot be increased in the new version in case of earthquake. I couldn't understand that part
Where you used to enter the ground safety stress, the ground bearing strength will be entered. The floor report has this value. Think of it like 3 times the ground safety stress.
3 times or about 2 times? In the past, we used to divide the carrying capacity by 3, now we divide it by 1,4 and enlarge it roughly 2 times, as if I am not mistaken. Otherwise, the areas that need improvement become salvageable without the need for improvement.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Published If the characteristic strength value is given in the soil report, divide this value by 1.4 and find qt. The base pressure must be less than this qt value in all combinations. You will enter the ground carrying power qt value in the program.
 
Back
Top