German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish Download ideCAD Structural v10.93
- Thread starter Ismail Hakki Besler
- Start date
Re: Column beam joint security is not displayed v10
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
Ismail Hakki Besler
Administrator
Re: Elevator side curtains v10
You can do as you say. So you can use the 70 cm vertical part as a headboard. This 70 cm and long curtain is a shell element. your grouping is correct. Enter information as the left only title for the curtain with 70 cm. In the curtain properties, the length of the title region, the left title, is 70, the right 0. For the other long curtain, set the left title as zero. After the calculation, reset the middle part of the 70 cm curtain. The moment capacity of the curtain group increases in the moment curvature relation of the curtain group when the curtain is only the head."Apocalpyse":1kkeemif" said:
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Published
If the lower limit condition mentioned in the article is not met, how will the "one more than the maximum allowed BYS" part be done? After all, it is determined automatically according to the floor height, how do we change it? How do we fix the error in the report even if we change the R coefficient with the method you said?"nurgulkaya":1bmwr9g7" said:
Apocalpyse
New Member
Re: Elevator side curtains v10
Mr. İsmail, thanks for your reply. It was very useful."Ismail Hakki Besler":38noq2pg" said:
MehmetYılmaz
New Member
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released Do you plan to release the demo version?
nurgulkaya
New Member
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released
"MrtGrsl":3jrr0jlv" said:
First of all, the above-mentioned rollover controls are 2 different controls, and the case that we mentioned Rnew= (4/5)R is item 4.3.2.4. R value is changed if it does not provide the ratio of the whole system to the ratio of the whole system and the overturning moment of the bulkheads on the side axes. This warning is given in the reports. You can edit the R coefficient in the Analysis Settings TBDY 2018 Options tab. If the material you are confused with does not meet the limit values in the items 4.3.4.5 - 4.3.4.6 -4.3.4.7, you may encounter penalties such as changing the ductility level and changing the R and D coefficients in some cases, since the BYS you need to use will rise to a higher class. Instead of these penalties, you can regulate the system rigidity as an engineer so that you do not have a tipping problem. Or if you want to design according to this penalty as an engineer, you don't have to do it from the wizard. All of these adjustments can be made from the TBDY Options tab in the analysis settings. The wizard is a tool created for you to see the conditions in the regulation. The program does not completely restrict you through the wizard. Good work."MrtGrsl":3jrr0jlv" said:
nurgulkaya
New Member
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Published
Hello; The demo version is still working, we cannot give a precise date. Please follow"MehmetYılmaz":uwrjmkqj" said:
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
Good work.Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released
"MYSA.MUH.":2cx2z7m1" said:
Hello. First of all, I would like to say that I agree with Mr. İsmail on this issue. If you search my messages in the forum, you can see that I am one of the users who scrutinize and criticize the program the most. There is a subject that I did not open that much and that I found by researching myself. However, your criticism here is very ruthless and without research. The steel module of one of the other domestic programs does not yet support the Turkish Steel Regulation, which was issued in 2016. There are parts in the reinforced concrete modules of both that do not comply with the latest earthquake regulations. The fact that the municipality control skips those parts does not make those softwares fully compliant with the regulation. Of course Idennin has its shortcomings, but the dev teams are working well and updates are coming fast. By the way, I am not saying that idecad is superior to other domestic software in every aspect. There are worse parts. But in general they are quite ahead."Ismail Hakki Besler":2cx2z7m1" said:
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released I also share with the technical team many points that I think are missing or need improvement. There is no software in the world that is not lacking. The important thing is are they trying to turn them off or not? There are also very important shortcomings in the other 2 domestic software, and when you ask whether you are fully compliant with the regulation at the moment, they can say yes, we are compatible. I spoke to the direct owner of one and he was able to tell me that. ideCAD, on the other hand, published pages of documents a few months ago, with what the software could do and what it could not do yet. It has no equal in Turkey, it makes respectable software in the world. It is not a nice attitude that they deem the name worthy of being given a 10 instead of a 9 in the face of the difficulties encountered while developing the software and you despise it. As miralay said, yes, there are points where it is behind compared to other software, but if you write it one under the other and sum it up, you will say that you are using ideCAD. For years in this country, a software did not check the minimum stirrups on the columns defined in the earthquake code. Then one day they made this control optional in options. Of course, they are aware of this situation, but I don't know if the quantity is in the print now, they didn't care... Having the other 2 software on the market is of course a plus. ideCAD also looks at them and makes up for their deficiencies, and they look at ideCAD and do the same. It's always good to have variety in the market. From time to time, İsmail Bey responds with a somewhat harsh attitude. But I try to empathize and understand it too. As with many other things in the country, producing software does not have much value compared to the world; software business is a business that requires investment for a long time. I don't know him personally, but thank you for bringing this software to the country. Yes, I buy it with money, but I feel comfortable because it's worth every penny.
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Has Been Released Hello, I have detailed many foreign and domestic structural engineering software, especially ideCAD Static, such as Dlubal Rfem, Midas Gen, Staad.Pro, RAM, Robot, SAP2000, Etabs. I am using. Among them, ideCAD Static; * Software update reports are kept and presented in a smooth, explanatory, transparent and professional manner, * Having technical support and software developer group, all of whom I know closely and who work at a really high quality, professional, academic level, * Design, combination with comprehensive modeling, domestic / foreign regulation-controlled analysis, It is a rare software even in the global field where designs, general construction drawings, manufacturing drawings and reporting are all integrated under a single software with practical ease of use. In IdeCAD Statik, I personally follow closely that all user feedbacks and problems detected in internal audits are handled in detail and tried to be solved in a professional and transparent manner with technical support and software updates. Since our new earthquake regulation contains much more detail than the previous one and requires application progress flow diagrams that are complex, enterprising, and require many different analyzes for a structure, which are difficult to understand, it is obvious that it will take time to fully set them up in the software infrastructure. In the meantime, new features have been added to the software in many subjects, including steel structures, apart from the new regulation compliance. I think that İsmail Bey and his entire team, who are based on full compliance with the new regulations in force, deserve great respect.
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10 Released I would like to add a different atmosphere with a small memory: In a version where many innovations came years ago, one of the users insisted, "Is there a dome solution?" he had asked. Ismail's answer is very meaningful: brother, maybe you will build a domed structure once in your life, you always ask this. He said that we have done so much work, why can't you see it. 
I remember again, when the dome solution was added to the program; we did it he said that your head will reach the sky. 
:lol: Yes, İsmail has a different attitude and style. I attribute this to his enthusiasm for his work. In the work done, the issue of solving the problem that the general suffers from is kept in the foreground. In IdeCAD, reality is at the forefront rather than popularity. IdeCAD is far beyond other software in terms of R&D. Beyond individual efforts, this business is trying to be carried out professionally. So there is a team. In other software, you cannot come across such a large team both in the foreground and background of the work.
I remember again, when the dome solution was added to the program; we did it he said that your head will reach the sky. :lol: Yes, İsmail has a different attitude and style. I attribute this to his enthusiasm for his work. In the work done, the issue of solving the problem that the general suffers from is kept in the foreground. In IdeCAD, reality is at the forefront rather than popularity. IdeCAD is far beyond other software in terms of R&D. Beyond individual efforts, this business is trying to be carried out professionally. So there is a team. In other software, you cannot come across such a large team both in the foreground and background of the work.Matmuhendislik
New Member
Re: My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O Ingenuity is subject to compliments, our ancestors say, I am grateful to the ide team for both their architectural and static-steel software.
Re: My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O One of the reasons for this harsh attitude towards domestic software is the academic environment. They have chewing gum in their mouths, they don't say anything but a cow-sausage. Recently, I had the opportunity to have a short conversation with the professors at the regulation introductory meeting in Izmir. In general, they say that domestic software blinds engineering and allows even non-skilled people to produce projects. Their detections are correct, but is this the fault of the native software? In this market, where thousands of new graduates participate every year, where there is no proper project control and where projects are made with ridiculous numbers, the demand for software developers is of course software that can produce projects automatically as much as possible. They also mentioned that there are serious errors in domestic software. A large part of the structures produced in our country are made with domestic software. If there are serious errors in these software, as the professors say, it is their duty as much as us engineers to detect them and take necessary action. Academician is the general professional title given to people who teach at universities and similar higher education institutions, conduct research and contribute to their field with their original research. I hope that one day they will stop insulting the engineers and local software they have trained and deal with the real problems of the engineering community.
Re: My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O First of all, thank you for your work for the V10 program. However, in regions with DTS=1 in the regulation, the building height limit is 17.5 meters for one-way ribbed floors. For this reason, many reinforced concrete structures turn to non-beam slab (mushroom) flooring. I think there are serious shortcomings in the program, not for solution, but in terms of drawing and control. Especially in the parts where there are beams between two curtains, in the beams around big shafts and in places where there are perimeter perimeter beams, instead of calculating the thickness of the slab without slab plate without beam from L/30, it calculates more thickness like unidirectional or bidirectional slab slabs with one-way or two-way running. This tells us that we did not provide the minimum thicknesses in the calculation report. Apart from this, slab punching control cannot be made on the column heads. Apart from this, there are also deficiencies in the drawings, but I believe that the issues I have mentioned in terms of calculation should be urgently addressed for companies doing business in the market.
Ismail Hakki Besler
Administrator
Re: My questions about ideCAD Static IDS v1O
Thanks for your interest, we are working on a very comprehensive update regarding the beamless slab drawings. However, this will not be an interim update and will be given free to 10.xx users."Uska":dznlinz4" said: