Advice about the project

[unver]

Hi Suggestion project is attached.

Easy. I can't solve the problem of column-beam shearing safety problem that I am constantly experiencing. Can you help. The project is in the link below. Thanks for your attention

INFO NOTE: In this case, there is an error in the project no, but it would be better if you combine the outer columns as a frame (In my province, if the outer columns are not combined as a frame, the project will not pass the inspection.) Ünver ÖZCAN

 

[batuhann28522]

Hello, the proposal is attached to the project. INFORMATION NOTE: In this case, there is no error in the project, but it would be better if you combine the outer columns as a frame (In my province, if the outer columns are not combined as a frame, the project structure It doesn't pass inspection.) Ünver ÖZCAN

Thank you very much, Mr. Unver. You are right, we don't want it actually, but this kind of overhangs occur in this area. I'll ask one more thing because I always get stuck with this beam-column connection error. What are your suggestions. What are your suggestions? How did you solve it? Thank you for your interest.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Easy. I can't solve the problem of column-beam cutting safety problem that I am constantly experiencing. Can you help. The project is in the link below. Thanks for your attention

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

TBDY 2018 item 7.5 and "Frequently Asked Questions" document 9 for column beam joint shear safety (B) deficiency You can review the item .

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[duriy3]

Hello. I have a project with B+5 floors. Although the dimensions and spans of the beams around the elevator curtain are the same on each floor, in the 2 beams on the basement floor (K05, K07); When I don't give dimensions like 50/70 to the beams, I cannot solve the Nmax errors. I would be very happy if you could share what you see as missing for the project as a whole. thanks in advance

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[HakanŞahin]

hello. I have a project with B+5 floors. Although the dimensions and spans of the beams around the elevator curtain are the same on every floor, in 2 beams (K05, K07) on the basement floor; when I do not give dimensions like 50/70 to the beams, Nmax

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Basement and upper floors are not the same.There is a rigid basement in the basement. K05 and K07 beams receive more horizontal force than the upper floor.Increasing the beam dimensions and increasing the concrete strength contributes to the solution.Depending on the semi-rigid(elastic) diaphragm solution in your project: Making a superstructure-foundation interactive solution Rigid basement floor Floor thicknesses Inside the floor the integrity of the slabs connected to the elements The choice of load-bearing system is the factors that affect the normal forces of the beam.Another solution is to resize and reinforce the beams like columns.(The program does not do it automatically.) Note: "Rigid diaphragm creation option" is marked on the D07 slab. tted. It does not need to be marked.

 

[duriy3]

hello. I have a project with B+5 floors. Although the dimensions and spans of the beams around the elevator curtain are the same on each floor, in the 2 beams on the basement floor (K05, K07); I can't solve the Nmax errors unless I give dimensions like 50/70 to the beams.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Basement and upper floors are the same not. There is a rigid basement in the basement. K05 and K07 beams receive more horizontal force than the upper floor. Increasing the beam dimensions and increasing the concrete strength contribute to the solution. Depending on the semi-rigid (elastic) diaphragm solution in your project: Making a superstructure-foundation interactive solution Having a rigid basement Floor Thicknesses of the floors within the floor The integrity of the floors connected to the elements Choosing the load-bearing system Factors affecting the normal forces of the beam. Another solution is to size and reinforce beams like columns. (The program does not do it automatically.) Note: "Rigid diaphragm generation option" is checked in the D07 tile. It does not need to be marked.

Thank you for the information you provided. I made the concrete class C35, I changed the beam dimensions, I increased the reinforcements, but it still does not save in normal dimensions. What size and reinforcement would you recommend?

 

[tayfuner]

Good night friends, I couldn't save the K error on the elevator curtain, it's only on 1 floor

 

[Levent Özpak]

Good night, friends, I couldn't save the K error on the elevator curtain, it's only on 1 floor, I'd appreciate it if you could help me

Hello, check the curtain group cutoff safety report; -And <Vemax ise; Perde grubu Betonarme diyaloğunda büyük etriye çapları seçerek ve/veya daha yüksek dayanımlı beton kullanarak çözüme ulaşabilirsiniz.
-Ve> On the other hand, Vemax wall dimensions can be enlarged, higher-strength concrete can be used, and options to reduce the shear force of the wall design can be evaluated with the changes to be made in the carrier system. Some notes: -When the Curtain Roll Moment Control report is examined, it is seen that there is no need to mark the &quot;Apply 4/5R&quot; lines in the Analysis Settings. (In this case, the problem of shear safety on the elevator curtain is resolved.) - With the &quot;Determine Object Direction&quot; command, it is appropriate to change the view direction of the K92 beam and ensure its continuity with the other beams. - When the final design is started, I recommend that the finite element widths of the floor and curtain be reduced (for example, 25 cm) and analyzed.

 

[49emrah49]

Plug error in the basement floor columns hello, although the basement floor has full curtain wall, I am getting a pursantage error on the columns. I keep getting this error lately. I tried it in another package program, it doesn&#39;t give this error. Can you help me please I want to learn the logic. thank you . good work

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[[email protected]]

The amount of reinforcement is too much Hello Idecad user friends I am a civil engineer who normally works as a site supervisor, I just started the project drawing business and I got a job, but although I drew the attached project, the contractor gave the same project to another colleague 10 tons less reinforcement professional users and admins, can you please inform me, what is my mistake? I&#39;m about to lose the job because it costs 30.000 TL per 10 tons. I would appreciate it if you could help urgently

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[2m proje]

Re: REINFORCEMENT QUANTITY URGENT ANSWER.. Hello; With a few small touches in your project, the quantity can be reduced from 87968kg to 79638kg. I list them below: 1- Set the beam width limit value to 41cm for double stirrups in beams. Thus, single stirrups will be defined in beams. 2- Cancel the Multiple stirrups option in the columns. 3- Disable stirrup tightening option for continuous foundations. Apart from these, the quantity may decrease further with the interventions to be made to the carrier system. For example, defining a raft foundation instead of a continuous foundation will not change the quantity, but will reduce the labor. Note: You must enter the beams defined from column to column as one piece. Straighten your horizontal beams. Best regards.

 

[[email protected]]

Re: EQUIPMENT QUANTITY URGENT ANSWER..

Hi; With a few small touches in your project, the quantity can be reduced from 87968kg to 79638kg. : 1- Set the beam width limit value to 41 cm for double stirrups in beams. Thus, a single stirrup will be defined in the beams. 2- Cancel the option of Multiple stirrups in columns. 3- Cancel the option of stirrup tightening in continuous foundations. Apart from these, the quantity may decrease further with interventions to the carrier system. For example Defining a raft foundation instead of a continuous foundation will not change the quantity, but it will reduce the workmanship. Note: You must enter the beams defined from column to column as one piece. Fix your horizontal beams. Best Regards.

God bless you, what is the main logic of 41 cm? If I grasp it, there is a difference of 4 tons, are there any other tips you can give?

 

[s_f_d]

Re: REINFORCEMENT QUANTITY URGENT ANSWER.. Hello; In the floor general settings (although there is no basement curtain in the plan), a rigid pipe floor definition is made, you should consider this situation as it will change the analysis and quantity. Good work.

 

[[email protected]]

Re: REINFORCEMENT QUANTITY URGENT ANSWER..

Hi; In the floor general settings (although there is no basement curtain in the plan), a rigid pipe floor definition has been made, since this situation will change the analysis and the quantity Good work. Should I change the rigidity on the basis of

? (Please excuse my ignorance, it&#39;s my first project )

 

[s_f_d]

Re: REINFORCEMENT QUANTITY EMERGENCY ANSWER.. You cannot change the foundation stiffness. The program does not allow.

 

[[email protected]]

Re: REINFORCEMENT QUANTITY URGENT ANSWER..

You cannot change the foundation stiffness. The program does not allow it.

thank you, God bless you ..

 

[[email protected]]

Re: REINFORCEMENT QUANTITY URGENT ANSWER.. From Analysis and Design section &gt;&gt; where it says reinforced concrete Beam parameters &gt;&gt; min b for double stirrups. &gt;&gt; The minimum b value should be 1 cm above the widest beam you use in the project. (For example, if 60/32 beams are used, this value should be 61 cm, if 50/32 is used, this value should be 51 cm.) Beam parameters &gt;&gt; H for the body iron. &gt;&gt; H value is 1 cm from the deepest beam used in the project. must be large. (For example, if 60/32 beams are used, this value should be 33 cm, if 25/60 is used, this value should be 61 cm.) From the Rib and Cassette Parameters &gt;&gt; For the Body Iron, the H value should be 1 cm larger than the deepest rib with the same logic. do . In Rib and Cassette Parameters &gt;&gt; Set the min .B &gt;&gt; value for Double Stirrup 1 cm larger than the widest rib with the same logic. From the Continuous Basic Parameters section, untick the Stirrup Tightening. From the Continuous Basic Parameters section &gt;&gt; For Double Stirrup, min. Make the B value 1 cm larger than the widest baseline value. From the Continuous Basic Parameters section &gt;&gt; Min. Make the H. value 1 cm greater than the deepest base value. THANKS A LOT TO THANK YOU, ESPECIALLY TO 2M, I SHARE IT SO THAT THOSE WHO ARE IN LOOKING CAN BENEFIT IT EASY..

 

[2m proje]

EQUIPMENT QUANTITY URGENT ANSWER.. Hello; There are requirements to be complied with in the regulation for double stirrups and body reinforcement, you should consider these when determining limit values! For example: If the beam height is greater than 600mm for the body reinforcement, it is said that the body reinforcement is required (TS500). In other words, body reinforcement may not be placed in a beam of h=60cm, but you have to put it when it is 61cm. Likewise, it is said that the distance between the stirrup arms will not exceed 350mm (TBDY2018). At this point, you are at the limit. Therefore, it would be wrong to generalize. Best regards.

 

[[email protected]]

Re: REINFORCEMENT QUANTITY URGENT ANSWER..

Hi, There are requirements to be complied with in the regulation for double stirrups and body reinforcement, you should consider them when determining limit values! For example: For the body reinforcement, it is said that if the beam height is greater than 600mm, it is said that the body reinforcement is required (TS500). That is, the body reinforcement may not be placed in the beam of h=60cm, but you have to put it when it is 61cm. Likewise, it is said that the distance between the stirrup arms will not exceed 350mm (TBDY2018). It would be wrong to generalize. Regards.

ok thanks for enlightening

 

[@HRS0571]

INSUFFICIENT RAFT REINFORCEMENT IN A 2-STORY BUILDING I MADE THE FOUNDATION HEIGHT EVEN 80 CM IN THIS 2-STOREY BUILDING, THE ERROR CONTINUES. OVERDOWNLOAD IS COMING, PLEASE HELP? IS NOT THAT MUCH REINFORCEMENT IN SUCH A BUILDING?

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

İZ.ide10.html