Advice about the project

There are many places about my project that I haven't solved and I tried many ways and it didn't work. I think there was a problem with the installation, I reloaded the project, thanks.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Suggestions and help about the project Good work. I would appreciate it if you could give advice and help about my mistakes and basic modeling in my current project. In the project that I am really curious about, the part that we define as the raft is the part that has 10 floors on it, and in the other two parts, only 3 floors are loaded up to the mezzanine floor. That's why we tried to make modeling more economical in this way. However, as a result of the ground survey, it indicates separate bearing coefficient and bearing capacity for the parts where continuous foundations come and for the raft section. Therefore, the municipality wants us to use the lowest value among them or to define separate bearing coefficient and bearing capacity for 3 separate sections. Since it is already problematic architecturally, it is unfortunately not possible to separate the project with dilatation and solve it only with a raft. The most important thing for me is that I can define the ground data separately. I can download the file to 12mb. That's why I uploaded it from a different site and shared it. Thank you from now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
urekli_radye.cde.html
 
RELATIVE FLOOR DELAY AND WEAK FLOOR PROBLEM I CONTINUOUSLY GET A WARNING TO INCREASING SYSTEM RIGIBILITY EVEN IF I DID NOT DEFINE SHUTTERS IN THE X DIRECTION, THE SYSTEM CANNOT SAVE ANY KIND. IF YOU HELP, I LOVE IT: [http://urlgool.com ?id=1Ci8s96UM2SqHNA1sa8nG5_Db1pbU5Aaj]https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ci8s9 ... Db1pbU5Aaj[/url]
 
Hello
"ltfoncl":330vqbhb" said:
I GET CONTINUOUS WARNINGS TO INCREASE THE SYSTEM RIGGING, EVEN IF I DID NOT DEFINE CURTAINS IN THE X DIRECTION, THE SYSTEM DOESN'T RECOVER ANY KIND I'D LOVE TO HELP
My suggestions for diaphragm errors, in diaphragm control: --Geometry -Increase the column-beam-floor dimensions, --There are curtain groups at the bottom of the project, and there is none at the top, add an unbalanced curtain, --Increase the concrete value, --Remove the BAP8-BAP14 that is not connected to the floor, -- There are unsuitable places in the terrace floor formwork plan, fix it, --There are too many mistakes (137), we can look again if you want after making the corrections.
 
Re: RELATIVE FLOOR SHIFT AND WEAK FLOOR PROBLEM
"ltfoncl":tkralyc2" said:
I GET CONTINUOUS WARNINGS TO INCREASE THE SYSTEM RIGIBILITY, EVEN IF I DO NOT DEFINE CURTAINS IN X DIRECTION: THE SYSTEM CANNOT SAVED A KIND OF SYSTEMS. =https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ci8s96UM2SqHNA1sa8nG5_Db1pbU5Aaj]https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ci8s9 ... Db1pbU5Aaj[/url]
-TBDY2018 Wizard/Design Spectra DD-3 values are entered incorrectly in the mezzanine tab. -There is more than one rigid diaphragm formation in the mezzanine. Check the "Rigid diaphragm creation" option in the Static tab from the properties of D21 and D23 slabs and D20 and D22 slabs at -180 cm. The elevations of the beams to which the D23 floors are connected are not compatible.)
 
RELATIVE STORY DELAY AND WEAK FLOOR PROBLEM I get the warning of increase system rigidity in the x direction, it does not save even though I add curtains, can anyone help
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: RELATIVE FLOOR DELAY AND WEAK FLOOR PROBLEM You have not taken into consideration the suggestions of Mr. Levent and me. Unver ÖZCAN
 
Re: Floor increase in existing buildings Hello; I'm trying to solve my project as Semi-Rigid, but it gives errors on the tiles that I can't solve. In the fully rigid solution, I get many B errors in the columns. Can you review the link I sent and help? thank you..
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
The beam height condition does not meet the beam height condition in the beamed slab In the project that I am trying to prepare the project for, it gives an error that the beam height does not meet the beam height requirement in the beamed slab. What can I do to fix the error. I would be glad if you help.
 
Is the cork floor formwork plan design that I have added correct hello Is the formwork plan design that I added is correct. Is this way of equipping done correctly?
 
Good afternoon, As can be seen in the attached file, the foundation system of our reinforced concrete structure, which will be used as a residence with 14 floors in total, has been chosen as pile foundation. The raft foundation depth was taken as 150 cm. The raft foundation ground safety stress and the bearing coefficient were taken as 0 (for the purpose of carrying the whole system by the excavations). What is recommended in this case. (note that the file is higher than 4mb so I couldn't add it)
 
I'm getting Nmax errors on beams in my project. When I give very large dimensions to the beams, only the errors are resolved. When I solve the ladder outside the building, the number of error beams decreases. Is there any other way I can troubleshoot? Also, I couldn't fix the cut-safe error on curtain P01 in the basement. can you help me? I would be very grateful if you could indicate what you see missing in the project in general
 
Hello
"duriy3":11royncd" said:
I am getting Nmax errors in the beams in my project. When I give the beams very large dimensions, the errors are only resolved. When I solve the ladder outside the building, the number of error beams decreases. Is there any other way to fix the problems? Also, P01 in the basement floor I couldn't fix the error of providing shear safety on the curtain wall. Can you help me? I would appreciate it if you could point out the things that you see missing in the project in general
My suggestions: --Fix the errors in the geometry control, --The ladder is not supported (all edges seem recessed.) In semi-rigid solution If you do not support the ladder correctly, the horizontal displacements of the building will be incorrect because the place where the ladder is located is rigid, --Take the K03 beam in the middle of the floor to support the ladder, --Let the K7 beam press the curtain, --Increase the thickness of the P02 curtain, if not, increase the curtains on the sides, (or add additional curtains.) --There is stapling, increase the height of the mat board, - -Insufficient raft reinforcement, increase the diameter of the reinforcement, -Do not indent in the upper right corner of the raft, go straight, --1. Increase the width of the K11 beam in the basement, --Make the concrete value C30, --Add flooring for the elevator machine, Ünver ÖZCAN
 
"unver":1qhao3i4" said:
Hi
"duriy3":1qhao3i4" said:
I am getting Nmax errors on beams in my project. When I give very large dimensions to the beams, only the errors are resolved. When I solve the ladder outside the building, the number of error beams decreases. Is there any other way I can troubleshoot? Also, I couldn't fix the cut-safe error on curtain P01 in the basement. can you help me? I would be very grateful if you could indicate what you see missing in the project in general
My suggestions: --Fix the errors in the geometry control, --The ladder is not supported. (all edges seem to be recessed.) If you do not support the ladder correctly in the semi-rigid solution, the horizontal displacements of the building will be incorrect because the place where the ladder is located is rigid (contained). Increase the thickness of the P02 curtain, if not, increase the curtains on the sides (or add additional curtains). . Increase the width of the K11 beam in the basement, --Make the concrete value C30, --Add flooring for the elevator machine, Ünver ÖZCAN
I did what you said, my report is no longer a problem. Thank you so much
 
Good afternoon, As can be seen in the attached file, the foundation system of our reinforced concrete structure, which will be used as a residence with 14 floors in total, has been chosen as pile foundation. The raft foundation depth was taken as 150 cm. The raft foundation ground safety stress and the bearing coefficient were taken as 0 (for the purpose of carrying the entire system by the piles). What is recommended in this case.
 
Back
Top