Advice about the project

Re: PROJECT DUCTILITY LEVEL
"CLOUD YÜCEL":3t0a7jra" said:
YASİN MR. ONLY TWO DIFFICULT COLUMNS LEFT CAN YOU HELP ME SOLVE THE ROJE? S26 AND S08 COLUMNS [url. /t-g9pAQnrzOM]https://we.tl/t-g9pAQnrzOM[/url] WE UPLOAD TO TRANSFER
Click to expand...
Hi Columns with Error B have emerged when the beams are connected to the column from the side as shown in the picture. You can solve these errors by extending the edge to the beam.I fixed most of them in the attached project.You need to make this beam into a single beam with the "Combine" command.
 
Re: project errors
"pelinagcan":11oltgwd" said:
I can't fix the errors in my project, I would appreciate it if you could help me
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
Hello. Ground bearing capacity (qt) appears to be 0.80 t/m2, the value is very low. Get it checked again. Currently, the average is 18t/m2 and the maximum is 46t/m2. You cannot solve the project without soil improvement or Pile foundation application with soil values. There is a relative floor drift problem because there is no curtain in the system and ground values. There is only one wall in the Y direction and there are relatively less problems in this direction than in X, and the relative floor drift ratios are in the X direction at the borders There are problems on all floors because there are no curtains. At least two curtains must be defined in both directions. First of all, you can try the elevator perimeter by making a U Curtain Group. In the TBDY 2018 Analysis settings wizard, A15 should be selected as the carrier system type in the directions with curtains. Column beam connection shear safety problems for below Check out Article 9 at the link.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: project errors Hello My suggestions: --Remove basement rigidity ticks since there are no curtains around the building on the basement floor, --4. and 5th floor Elevator/machine floor ticks, -- Floor bearing strength qt=0.8 t/m2 is given. This value must be corrected incorrectly. (For the purpose of giving an idea, a soil value with a soil safety stress of 10 t/m2 compared to the past, now approximately the soil bearing capacity should be qt=18 t/m2.) --X direction Rx=8, Y direction Ry=7 should be selected, - -Add curtains to prevent floor drifts (make a group curtain around the elevator) Ünver ÖZCAN
 
First of all, good job everyone. I was using a different design program before. This is my first project with İdecad and unfortunately in the city I live in, no frame is created on the columns on the outer contour. By stating this, I wanted to consult you about a problem in my project. I noticed that 0 reinforcements were thrown in the detail of a cantilever beam during the laying phase. In the section (Fiber) design part, the beam looks hollow. Moreover, when I press the button to change the reinforcement on the K01 beam while adjusting the reinforcement, the reinforcement in K02 changes. I can only change K01 with the button on K02. Have you encountered zero reinforcement in beams like this before? BEAM DETAIL
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
CONSOLE TIP
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
MESNET
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
MODEL LINK
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"fuatmuh":3grz03j6" said:
First of all, good work to everyone. I was using a different design program before. This is my first project with İdecad and unfortunately in the city I live in, no frames are created on the outer contour columns. I noticed that 0 reinforcement is thrown in the detail of the cantilever beam. In the section (Fiber) design part, the beam looks hollow. Moreover, when I press the button to change the reinforcement on the K01 beam while adjusting the reinforcement, the reinforcement in K02 changes. With the button in K02, I can only change K01. BEAM DETAIL
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
CONSOLE END
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
MESNET
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
MODEL LINK
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
teacher, which city do you live in?
 
"Fuat1":nixlw07v" said:
"fuatmuh":nixlw07v" said:
First of all good work everyone. I was using a different design program before. This is my first project with İdecad and unfortunately in the city I live in, no frame is created on the columns on the outer contour. By stating this, I wanted to consult you about a problem in my project. I noticed that 0 reinforcements were thrown in the detail of a cantilever beam during the laying phase. In the section (Fiber) design part, the beam looks hollow. Moreover, when I press the button to change the reinforcement on the K01 beam while adjusting the reinforcement, the reinforcement in K02 changes. I can only change K01 with the button on K02. Have you encountered zero reinforcement in beams like this before? BEAM DETAIL
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
CONSOLE TIP
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
MESNET
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
MODEL LINK
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
teacher, which province do you live in?
Click to expand...
Yozgat
 
Hello
"omer.faruk":21tpdvuh" said:
hello. My project that I solved as a partial basement is attached. Can I get your opinions and suggestions
Click to expand...
My suggestions; It would be better if you frame the outer columns in such a high structure, a solution without making the elevator curtains a group don't do it, don't lower the raft foundation level while calculating under the elevator curtains, (IDECAD recommendation)
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Unver ÖZCAN
 
"unver":258bke3l" said:
Hi
"omer.faruk":258bke3l" said:
hello. My project that I solved as a partial basement is attached. May I have your opinions and suggestions
Click to expand...
My suggestions; It would be better if you frame the outer columns in such a high structure, Do not make a solution without grouping the elevator curtains, Do not lower the raft foundation level under the elevator curtains while calculating, (IDECAD recommendation)
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Ünver ÖZCAN
Click to expand...
Thank you very much for your suggestions.
 
"omer.faruk":26ljp50a" said:
hello. My project that I solved as a partial basement is attached. Can I get your opinions and suggestions. Also, due to your level geometry, your raft foundation on the upper floor does not seem to be compatible with the lower floor.
Click to expand...
 
"fuatmuh":2bsaha3c" said:
First of all, good work to everyone. I was using a different design program before. This is my first project with İdecad and unfortunately in the city I live in, no frames are created in the columns on the outer contour. I wanted to consult you about a problem in my project by stating this. I noticed that 0 reinforcement is thrown in the detail of the cantilever beam. In the section (Fiber) design part, the beam looks hollow. Moreover, when I press the button to change the reinforcement on the K01 beam while adjusting the reinforcement, the reinforcement in K02 changes. With the button in K02, I can only change K01. BEAM DETAIL
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
CONSOLE END
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
MESNET
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
MODEL LINK
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
Hello, In case the two consoles you are experiencing are supported by each other, cross-section not being drawn is among our notes. For K01 and K035, which are stuck together with the consoles command for now, if it is called "not console", the lower and upper reinforcements are thrown in the beams in a normal way. You can access the not console command in Ribbon menu->Change->Beam/Foundation->Consoles. After this, reset additional reinforcements K01 and K035 so that the drawings are created correctly. Manually select the reinforcement that will provide the required As for the beam, such as 2Ø12 - 2Ø14 for assembly and flat reinforcement.
 
Its Architecture and Statics are attached; Is it possible to find a more economical approach in the single-storey building that I have analyzed? Is my basement floor definition correct? Is it correct to connect individual foundations with one part continuous foundation and one part tie beam? I would appreciate it if experienced friends can criticize in general. Thank you in advance. Happy holidays from your sentence.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
How to make the most suitable foundation design Hello, First of all, I need urgent help. There is a place to zipline. Concrete will be poured under the pillars and they asked me for a project. The weight of the poles shall not exceed 700 kg as a point of the concrete to be carried by 380 kg in total. The excavated area is 1.5 m wide and 1.5 m long and 2 m long. 1.5 m steel pole will be buried in this concrete and concrete will be poured around it. My questions are: 1. If I make a raft foundation and make a depth of 1 m, do I need to open a raft space for the poles? Can the foreman understand by looking at this and will there be any changes in the static account? But here, I thought I wouldn't need to open a raft space since I'm going to bury the steel with concrete and pour concrete. Still, I would like to get your opinion. Since it is 2.2 m by 1.5 m, can the dimensions be made on the foundation all the time, or how can the most suitable design be made in idecadd?
 
"Sucree":1l4e6mxh" said:
hello, I'm waiting for your comments on the overall design, with errors in the foundation and a few columns in the basement in my project
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
Hello, Some observations and suggestions for your project are as follows: -Both of the curtain arms in the b1 curtain group do not provide the ratio of 1/6. In order to enter as a curtain, at least one of the arms must provide the ratio of 1/6. Dimensions If it will stay like this, it would be appropriate to enter it as a polygon column. - There is a rigid basement floor in your project. It would be appropriate to choose the "bi-load state" calculation method in the Analysis Settings / General Settings tab. (In this case, there is no negative gun problem at the base) You can review the information on the subject given in the link below .
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
-Axial Capacity Insufficient Problem in Column, TBDY 2018 7.3.1.2 and TS 500 7.4. Satisfy any of the conditions specified in 1. occurs if it does not. Detailed information is given in the "Column Axial Force Control" report. To solve the problem; -The dimensions of the columns can be enlarged, -Higher strength concrete can be used, -New columns/walls can be added to the carrier system to reduce the effects on the column, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top