Re: ideCAD Static 6.2005 Update (19.07.2010) Hello First of all, thank you to everyone who contributed. IdeYapı is progressing rapidly on its way to becoming better and is completing its existing shortcomings. I will have some criticisms and suggestions in this regard. In my opinion, there is a mistake made like this: We say that we are building ALL KINDS of pools, stairs, domes, vaults we want at the moment in the Ide building, but I bet that no one has made a project using any of these facilities and passed it through any institution. We say that we are doing pool analysis, but we cannot use it because there is no reinforcement calculation in the reports. The same is true for the dome and vault. In addition, the dome and vault are always placed on any system, but we cannot do this either. We say that we do a staircase analysis (even a fantastic staircase), but we cannot analyze the most common staircases, such as the most commonly used double-arm staircase or helix staircase. because we cannot define a curvilinear axis. Wouldn't it be more useful if he could analyze the most frequently used models (5-6 types), especially in pools and stairs, and give reinforcement calculations in their reports instead? I removed the pool, vault, dome elements and analysis buttons from the toolbar. Because I never use it. We say that we are making an inclined slab without beams, but we cannot fit another slab on the slanted slab we made by angling. I mean, for some of the features you've developed with so much effort; It is more important to be able to do specific and most general things than to say we can do everything and do nothing. Some of my requests 1) Please find a solution to the index part of the floor parameters. Either the program defines it automatically (like B, Z, 1,2.. in the most general form) or we can define them without copying layers. I'm tired of noticing this while taking the drawings and making arrangements in every project and going back to the beginning. At least, the program will warn us about this when we start the geomatric control or analysis. 2) Let the program automatically determine the multiple stirrups in the columns, or let's set a value for the long side as in the beams, and the columns that pass this will be automatically dissolved into double stirrups. 3) The possibility of hydrostatic loading on the curtains so that we can make the pool in the model we want. 4) After the analysis, we can't find enough results about the elements in the reinforced concrete section. We can view values such as deflection and buckling in beams from the reports section. We can see the values by getting a report for the beam joint shear safety control of the columns. It would be much better if we could reach such values more quickly. 5) Arranging the drawing of floor plans of structures with slab spaces. 6) Possibility to define beams to the open side of the polygon U column. These criticisms are purely well-intentioned. I am writing these because I want the program I use as an ide build user to be the best among its competitors. Thanks again to everyone who contributed. Take it easy everyone.
German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish