What would you like to have in ideCAD Static?

"tavekkul":3u9bekcq" said:
do I need to fasten it with a rigid fastener from the bottom of the column to do this?
Click to expand...
Hello; In this type of analysis, you don't need to make any special definitions other than the normal basic definition process, the program does not need to make a rigid connection. It will automatically create its own elements.
 
"tavekkul":2wmr1owq" said:
"cassabotanic":2wmr1owq" said:
the periods of dilated structures are calculated completely independently of each other.
Click to expand...
can you show this in an example project... also curtain shear ratios to be calculated for dilated structures important example... that is, an independent calculation must be made according to the earthquake code.
Click to expand...
Hello; Attached are excerpts from the dynamic analysis reports of the two dilated structures. If you look carefully, you will see that the 1st and 2nd modes occur in RD1 (left structure) and 3rd and 4th modes occur in RD2 (right structure). Period calculations for the structure are calculated independently for each structure depending on the modes. In addition, it is recommended by the ideal structure that the structures that you think should have different R coefficients (even two structures that are completely separated from each other by dilatation) should not be solved in the same project. If you are going to solve it together, you have to make a joint solution according to the most negative situation. Despite all this, I think that there should be an option to calculate by entering different R coefficients for dilated structures, I mentioned this a long time ago :)) Best regards.
 
Suggestion Dear IdeYapi administrators; I would like to express an issue that I think would be good to include in the next update of the program. While working in any floor window, when any settings/properties window related to the command you are working on are opened, it will bring great ease of use if the zoom and pan commands continue to work in the floor window below. Could you please take it into consideration and add it to the update if possible. Thank you.
 
Basic, application drawing and poses Hello, In the program, the pose numbers of the shoots left in the foundation do not appear in the drawing. When we look at the basic donut table, we see that the sprouts are located together with their pose. The same shoots are also shown in the column application plan with a different pose number and in the column and curtain details and are included in the tables. In this case, the basic shoots are mentioned in the tables twice, but with different pose numbers. I think some regulation is needed here. There may be errors when checking the quantity by collecting the tables. (This repetitive problem is not found in the quantity reports. The figures in the report are the correct numbers.) Also, if it is possible to name the related reinforcement poses globally, I think it would be better if the renumbering is not done on a sheet basis, but rather the numbering in general? (At least, excluding beams, it would be better if global exposure could be done.) Another issue is the article numbering next to the column and curtain reinforcements in the column application plans. These poses go unnoticed when given in normal writing style. I think it would be better if they were in other pose styles, in a circle or an ellipse. Respects
 
Soil pressure, water pressure, etc. lateral thrusts... Suggestion... It is a nice feature that shear walls can be modeled as shells. Your mesh algorithm is also very nice. Besides all these features, for example, to be able to exert lateral load on shell elements (eg water pressure, soil pressure etc.) It would be nice to add an algorithm similar to the "joint pattern" in . I think this would be a breakthrough for ideCAD. In this way, there would be no lateral load that we could not affect on the building. If you remember, for this process in SAP2000, first of all, after permanently meshing the shell element, it is necessary to assign the "joint pattern" (lateral load change) we created to the formed nodal points. A similar approach can be applied in ideCAD. Good work...
 
Hello. As seen in the picture I added, I think it would be better if the reinforcement texts are written a little further inside (as in the right figure) rather than at the end of the reinforcement as in the left figure.
 
1) pushover (pushover analysis) (it happens in idecad5), we want to use this option for reinforcements, but the building made in idecad 6 is not included in 5th. 2) Eurocode 7 regulation (other static programs have it, why not?)
 
As seen in the attached picture, it is expressed in writing as Column application plan, Column vertical expansions, Curtain detail. It takes up a lot of space in the toolbar. It would be better to display them as dimge. Good luck with.
 
Greetings, I would like to draw column sprouts on the base or at the height of the floor above the base without sprouts while optionally applying the column reinforcements. In the project I drew in Romania, they wanted the column reinforcements on the foundation in the vertical plan of the column without interruption throughout the floor. In other words, they say that the column reinforcements should come out full size from the foundation element. give this option later. Can it be optional?
 
Menu Clean Hello. The dialog where we enter numerical values in the Axle, Column, Offset etc. menus fills up unnecessarily over time, this section needs to be cleaned from time to time, the situation does not change even if I start the program with the defult setting. it takes up space somehow. For example, I wrote 0.75 and then another value, 0.75 again, and it stays in the memory repeatedly in the list. However, different values should not remain in the list, the same values should not extend the list unnecessarily, so that it is easy to choose between rows..
 
General Settings/ Font Selection Hello.. When we start the program with the first settings, all texts appear as Arial fonts.. Can't this situation be changed at once? After making the font selection for all elements at once, the desired font size or text placement can be adjusted according to their own preference.
 
Hello there; I wanted to share a few issues that I think should be in the updates. 1. Inclined Axes: As it is known, inclined axes are not automatically dimensioned in drawings such as formwork plan or column application in the program. In order to overcome this problem, I draw 3 axes with the same name and create a single axis whose parts outside the contour continue straight. In both architectural projects and static projects, the parts of the curved axes outside the contours are not drawn obliquely. It would be nice if possible to draw straight parts of inclined axles outside the contours. 2. Beam Supplementary Reinforcements: In some cases, beam support additions may overlap each other in short beams. In this case, it would be nice if there is a reinforcement selection logic by increasing the number of flat reinforcements and decreasing the number of additional reinforcements, taking into account the beam flat reinforcements. 3. Cassette and rib slabs: a- Especially in rib-cassette slabs that do not have a rectangular plan or are continuous with different slabs, the inability to define a sufficient number of rib beams both causes a lot of effort and prevents a healthy solution. In order to eliminate such problems, an arrangement that would free the number of type beams, that is, allow the selection of as many types of beams as desired, would be very good. b- It would be very nice if it is possible to define the FINISH TEETH WIDTH in addition to the STARTING TEETH WIDTH, which will make it easier for us to create the formwork plan drawings for application in cassette slabs, or if an arrangement can be made that will enable us to create the attached cassette slab formwork plan. Best regards.
 
1- modeling gusseted beams 2- making the beam stirrups in two different dimensions such as inside and outside instead of equal arms 3- one-click pleated design option for floors 4- not being supported on the beams when solving the floors, but taking into account the bending rigidity of the beams (for example, using safe for floors) We have to.) 5- not changing the dimensions of the elements after solving, having a lock as in sap2000 6- automatic updating of the quantity if the user makes changes in the reinforcement drawings (for example, I added a cross in the column, it is not included in the quantity.)
 
The reinforcement axle edit command fulfills your request number 3. Select all the tiles you want to change, and give the command to edit the reinforced concrete axis from the right-click menu. (You may need to click a few times :) ) It's a bit of a utopian idea that everything can be done with "one click", then there will be tens of thousands of different "one click do this" commands to the program, it becomes inextricable... With the option to solve the floors together with the carrier system, your request will be met as one step further. If we make your request number 5, complaints may come that "we want to change" this time, because this possibility creates the need to analyze again and again for minor changes. Now, for example, it provides an opportunity to increase the beam width by 5 cm and quickly make reinforced concrete and see if the beam is saved. Of course, full analysis+reinforced concrete is required for full consistent results.
 
I don't know if this has been asked before; I don't even know if there is a solution. What I want to do is this. Some of the floor slabs will be at different elevations such as 100 cm. We did it, no problem. However, I want to draw a fringe on the part given 100 cm jeans. However, it is not possible due to the flooring underneath. It doesn't make much sense to add a new floor for 100 cm either. If there is a solution for this, what is it?
 
"muhendismy":30efjiyn" said:
I don't know if it's been asked before; I don't even know if there is a solution, but what I want to do is this. Some of the floor slabs will be at a different level, like 100 cm. I want to draw eaves. However, it is not possible due to the flooring underneath. It doesn't make much sense to add a new floor for 100 cm either. If there is a solution for this, what is the solution? Otherwise, it would be good to add the option to draw the tiles freely in the new version?
Click to expand...
I think you have the answer
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Column line layer and text layer, beam line layer and text layer (in the screen) are not the same... When we send the picture to autoca, there is a problem in the same layer as the lines and texts... It would be better if the layers were separate, at the same time, it gives the number of stirrups in the dimension layer in beam expansions. it would be nice to be different...thanks...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top