German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish What would you like to have in ideCAD Static?
- Thread starter ideCAD
- Start date
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hello, 4 -7 meters in hollow slabs etc. After the opening is passed, automatic transverse threading is possible in the program: Enter all your ribs as a cassette object that defines the transverse thread (There is no difference between the cassette and rib objects except for the notification possibilities.) Please see the information given in the link below:"telvin":1mf7an4p" said:
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
Good work...mhanifiata
New Member
Hi mhanifiata, This email was sent to you by ammer via your account on the "ideCAD Forum" message board. If you think this e-mail is spam or you are disturbed by its content, please contact the e-mail address below. [email protected] This email was sent to you by ammer. The following message was sent to you: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ dear sir i'm so happy to write to to at the first time,i'm acivil engineer from iraq,i heard idecad software which is a greatest design software in the turkey form civil engineers users.i have downloaded a copy of idecad static v 6.5 but i don't have a crack of it.i wounder if you can to help me to sending me a copy of idecad static crack to my email below [email protected] many thanks to you by regards ammer ide I wanted to bring it to the attention of building authorities...
excalibur_24
New Member
-I FIRST WANTED THAT THESE BALCONY REINFORCEMENTS CAN BE SELECTED SEPARATELY LIKE STAIR REINFORCEMENTS. THE PROGRAM USES AUTOMATIC 8 PIECE IRON. IT TAKES A LOT OF OUR TIME TO THICKEN EVERY FLOOR ONE BY ONE. -WHEN WE DON'T WANT TO DEFINE THE FLOOR SPACES IN THE MOLD PLAN, THERE IS AN EXAMPLE CAVITY DETAIL AT THE END OF THE SHEET BECAUSE WHEN WE DEFINE THE SPACE ON THE FLOORINGS, THE FLOOR SECTION IS INSUFFICIENT ERROR MAY OCCUR. - WHEN WE SELECT THE COLUMNS IN SCREEN SIZE, THE PROGRAM DEFINES IT AS AUTOMATIC SCREEN BUT WHEN WE LOOK AT THE REINFORCED CONCRETE, WE CANNOT SELECT IT AS A SHELL. -IN COLUMN-BEAM JOINTS, MAKE THE BEAM DIMENSIONS 1 CM. B ERRORS CAN BE CORRECTED WHEN WE ENLARGE OR MAKE 1 CM MADE. 25 CM. INSTEAD OF BEAM 26 CM. THE BEAM IS ENTERING AND MILLING THEIR PLANS. - THE ELEVATOR GIVES A LOT OF ERRORS IN THE CURTAINS.
excalibur_24
New Member
-I WANTED TO HAVE AN INDEX AT THE HEART OF THE REPORT -I WANTED THE DETAIL OF THE LADDER TO BE OUT OF 1/20 SCALE. THERE IS A VERY LARGE OUTPUT IN THE DETAIL OF THE LADDER. WE HAVE TO CHANGE IT. WE CHANGE IT FROM THE SETTINGS, BUT THEY DRAW THE SAME WAY
Levent Özpak
New Member
"excalibur_24":2kijydeg" said:
Levent Özpak
New Member
After receiving the report, you can display and print the index by clicking the "show index" icon."excalibur_24":1dntkd5n" said:
Ladder detail is drawn as 1/1 on the drawing screen. I think your problem will be solved if the scale is 1/20 when printing out the drawing.
excalibur_24
New Member
- When we define the elevator six foundations, there should be reinforcement details in the plan - there should be typical details such as parapet detail, column compaction detail entering the foundation, curtain foundation compacting detail entering the foundation, floor space detail, etc...
Görkem2007
New Member
For a retrofit project, we had to model an old structure with idecad static. Both 12 and 14 gauge reinforcements were used for the tie beams in this old project. I can enter them into the İdecad model, but every time I make an analysis, the reinforcements of these tie beams I mentioned are changed by the program. This is not a big problem. I can fix these reinforcements from the tie beam window before I get the report. However, it would be nice if we could lock the reinforcements of the tie beams (as we do for beams, slabs, etc.).
yılmaz polat
New Member
I think that weight type and ribbed retaining wall reinforced concrete designs should be added in addition to the existing reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall... thank you for your interest...
ottomancagatay
New Member
1-The thing that bothers me the most is the hollow slabs, it is necessary to adjust each slab, in another static program it automatically adjusts all the secondary beams to the opening according to the size of the slab, it would be great if this feature was added, it would be great if additional styrofoam, brick etc. It would be nice. 2- In some buildings (mostly basement curtains), columns and curtains that go up give different reinforcements, I think this should be fixed. 3-dome, vault, pile foundation, it would be good to give their reinforcements. It would be better to arrange the reinforcements on raft foundations with 4-stage and elevator pits. 5-When we transfer it to the Autocad program, it would be better if there were different layers, layer thicknesses and example details. 6-Sometimes small beams remain under the beams and a work can be done to resolve this. 7-For example, when the upper elevation of the SZ01 column is -61 cm, it analyzes when we forget to lower the elevation of the S01 column on the upper floor. If we did not look at the geometric control, we can notice it when we get the column details. it would be fine. When we make the 8-column 175/25, the program perceives it as a curtain, but we model it as a rod. According to my knowledge, it is more appropriate to model it as an acceptance, that is, to enter it as a panel object. It is necessary to enter it, there is no problem in small projects, but it is very difficult in big projects, maybe you can put the option to convert to this or model as an acceptance to the column properties. 9-Some projects need to be solved semi-rigidly, I made projects that took 12 minutes, 25 minutes or even 63 minutes to analyze, which is pretty annoying, there is an option to close the floor, foundation, etc. in order to be able to analyze faster, but there is no possibility to reduce the analysis time in semi-rigid what about? Some of my requests may not be possible, after all, we do not know the software, I just wrote it as a suggestion because I wanted it to be a little more practical, which bothered me. What I want most to happen is what I wrote in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd items. I wish everyone a good work, good, halal and easy profitable business 
2- This is idestatic skin In your design, it means that there is a column with a margin equal to or lower than 1% in the basement, and a column with a margin of greater than 1% in the upper floor. As t, it shows that it is more difficult than the lower floor. If this column had more pursant than the lower floor, but still below 1%, both would have the same reinforcement. Here, ideStatik adds as many sprouts as the number of reinforcements missing from the upper column to the lower column, which I think is correct... Of course, it's up to you to manually intervene and equalize these reinforcements or increase the column dimensions... 7- A problem related to data entry and geometry control warning is given. I think there is no problem, I think it would not be appropriate for the program to intervene directly in the project. However, there may be an option to perform automatic geometry check before analysis. 9- This is a result of the nature of the semi-rigid diaphragm. It takes a long time to make a solution with so many shell elements in the system. As you say, can optimization be done, programmers will know..."ottomancagatay":2hh5rzn3" said:
it is necessary to select an existing load in the load library, derive it and save it as. For example: I should easily derive another one from the low slab load. I should make one 30 cm lower and the other 25 cm and use both in the same project. Or: I should easily produce two from 18 cm aerated concrete wall at beam loads. Let the wall height be 2.50m in one, and 2.80 in the other. After all, every time; create new load aerated concrete height unit h. network. plaster height unit h. network. create new load tile thickness, weight mortar thickness, weight plaster thickness, weight fill thickness, weight.... ..... not reasonable. In short, I should be able to hover over a load and derive and change it with a command called "derive".
A few requests 1. IN BASIC ACCOUNTS, SOIL STRESS VALUES OF BOTH EARTHQUAKE AND NON-EARTHQUAKE COMBINATIONS ARE SHOWED IN THE SAME TABLE IN THE REPORT, CONTROL AUTHORITIES MAY SOMETIMES ASK, WHICH SITUATION IS MORE NEGATIVE. 2. STAIRS WITH DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS CAN BE MADE WITHIN THE SAME PROJECT, WE CAN NAME THEM IN THE STAIR SETTINGS, BUT THESE NAMES ARE NOT PRINTED IN THE REPORT. SOMETIMES WE HAVE ANY DIFFICULTY TO UNDERSTAND WHICH LADDER HAS ACCOUNT RESULTS. 3. IS IT POSSIBLE TO ADD THE OPPORTUNITY TO SELECT DAMAGED ELEMENTS ON THE FLOOR WINDOW IN EARTHQUAKE PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTS? IT MAY HAVE DIFFERENT COLORS DEPENDING ON DAMAGE LEVELS, CAN CUT DAMAGED ELEMENTS BE SHOWED DIFFERENTLY? WE ARE TRYING TO NOTE THE NAMES OF THE DAMAGED ELEMENTS IN THE PROJECT AND TAKE A LOOK AT THE PROJECT, TAKING SERIOUS TIME ON LARGE PROJECTS. I would like to thank all idecad employees in advance and take it easy.