German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish What would you like to have in ideCAD Static?
- Thread starter ideCAD
- Start date
1. SIMILAR FLOOR DRAWING IN RIBBON BEAMS 2. DRAWING REINFORCEMENT ON PILE FUNDAMENT 3. CORRECTIONS AT THE POINTS WHERE THE PANEL IS STRESSED TO THE RADIUS 4. DRAWING DONATİ PARADISE ON THE RADIUS 6. WORDS AND FILE CONVERSION OPPORTUNITY AS WE TURNED INTO PDF E IN THE REPORT, MOST PEOPLE HAVE TO DO THIS. 8.RİJİT in Bodrum in OR PROCEEDING curtain GRDG I KADARYL WALL LOAD DUE TO THE TAB for signs WALL LOAD GİRİLMY Cargo ADD TO BE BUT HOW MANY PEOPLE USE is YADA HATRLY is 9.KİRİŞ WALL LOAD AHEAD WALL LOAD CALCULATION on ME KNOW I ACCORDING TO BEAM CENTRAL POINT OF UNIFORM LOAD AS GRLY is OYSA WALLS BEAMS SCRATCH LOADING(SAMPLE BEAM IS 30/50 WALL IS 10 LEFT BEAM MIDDLE POINT 30/2=15 WALL 10/2=5 BECAUSE IT IS BURNED OR LOOKED FROM 15-5=10 CM LOADING. IS IT NOT circular? There should be a column drawing 11. We should have a chance to load on a continuous foundation on the singular foundation, not on the column, only on the raft foundation, as point and linear loads like nürmal slabs. he says, we are trying to do this, when we add another basement, we will not get rid of the raft foundation problem, it is true, it will stress, but the foundation attached to it will also increases in thickness
Dimensioning is one of the most time-consuming parts when preparing a mold plan. Especially if there are objects with oblique angles, dimensioning can sometimes turn into pain. In the formwork plan dimensioning in 2 dimensions, it will work very well if there is an internal dimensioning option as in 3 dimensions. I'm not talking about the intersection dimensioning in 2 dimensions. Because it can coincide with the rib gaps of the beams. Or we can throw the inner dimension in 3 dimensions to 2 dimensions without exploding.
Some requests regarding ease of use. * In automatic naming, raft foundations should not be named D. * In column-beam etc reinforced concrete tables, there should be a button to select all of them or ctrl A can be used. * Again, when the title row of the same tables is clicked, they are sorted according to the clicked column. * I wrote before; make the load library easy to derive and save. * Show the layer when you wait on the object or click on the object. Write the angles of beams and curtains on the plan. * When converting objects drawn on the black screen by import or by someone else, they should be converted to negative colors. The blocking is too much and I think it's weird. * It is too small to have 1/50 sprouts and trestle reinforcement drawing in the basic application. 20 would be better. I am growing every time. * colon appl. axle drawings and dimensions should be as in the formwork plan. etc small things.
What comes to my mind right now, in addition to the section and reinforcement tolerance in the Analysis settings, it will be beneficial for the engineer to add the negative tolerance to stay in the safe direction. Because the projects solved in the idecad environment are based on the principle of economic calculation. For example, reinforcement may be required when the project, which is designed as a laminate floor covering, is later converted to tile covering. Or, when a simple steel construction is desired to be built on the roof, reinforcement may be required in the existing structure. In such cases, it may be convenient for engineers who want to stay on the safer side for the required sections/reinforcements.
'Projects solved in the ideCAD environment are based on the economic calculation principle.' Then ideCAD is doing analysis and calculations. The 3 purposes of engineering are - Safety - Economy and Aesthetics. Real engineering is to bring the structure to the optimum point in terms of safety and economy. In other words, whether the design is economical or not is in the hands of the engineer. I could not figure out its relevance to ideCAD. Otherwise, I could not use this expression for ideCAD It means staying on the unsafe side."illaga":3356dp15" said:
saridurmus
New Member
Hi Nedim, You are tired of waiting today, you think you need innovation.
"saridurmus":h40vm7p8" said:
I agree.... For example, it would be nice if there could be a change in the interface that has been going on for many years. Looking at the same screen and interface, he looks for a change.They say, "There is comfort in Tebdil-i space", am I right?mhanifiata
New Member
I agree with nedim dress. The presentation of the product along with the quality is very important. Now, many expressions are made without using hundreds of words with visuals. visuality stands in the background a bit in idestatic. We can't say it's not important. We cannot say that this is the most important of all. an interface innovation is needed.
saridurmus
New Member
need to shake once in a while. As texting says, it is necessary to consider the visual aspect as well.
Automatically making the revisions made in the data entry later in the two-dimensional layouts, for example, if the beam dimensions are changed, they are also changed in the formwork plan. This feature is available in Tekla Structures (XSteel) software. In case of completion of drawings, due to changes made in architectural projects, etc. Changing the axle distances or making changes in the previously created plans and details after the adjustments made in the calculations will make the changes that develop after the end of the project not be an ordeal. Good work...
babisko_fet
New Member
I definitely don't want such a change, or rather a big change. Look at the Autocad app... it just changed the EXPLODE icon, which cracked the core until many people found it. And even he left the change optional. Wouldn't it be more important to ask for what you find missing in the output (calculation and/or drawing) rather than visuals"saridurmus":pnowqbvc" said:
When we take the plan, detail, etc. 2D drawings and close them from the corner of the screen, it will be better if it returns to the previous screen (the last active) instead of the empty screen when it is deleted (or closed) after the message "this drawing will be deleted, continue....". Or, in more general terms, would it be better if a screen with an x in the corner of the screen is turned off and it returns to the last active screen?
Tile edge, danny slab edge, line, circle etc. When editing (especially tiling with primitive objects, etc.), the same dialog screen (only "settings" is written including the title) does not give us a clear direction about which object we are editing. Combine text change and text properties command. (re)