German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish mhanifiata
New Member
Is it possible to save building 3D images and building plans in high quality image format in projects made with idecad static? Required to prepare presentation file. Is it possible to set the background color while saving pdf?
Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7
- Thread starter Ismail Hakki Besler
- Start date
HakanŞahin
Administrator
"mhanifiata":1eo4pudv" said:
YasinTezel
Member
"mhanifiata":26m1f7mk" said:
Mr. Sereze "Mr. Ünver, I also studied the project. When we look at the project from the 3D frame, all the beams and columns seem to be connected with a joint point. How do we check if there are any errors in the supports?" We can see the support nose by looking at the formwork plan without looking at the 3D frame. Attached "BREAK NAMES" as I have shown; 1- If we are going to accept columns and beams as support and write beams between them, it should write BEAM NAME and EBAD. If not, there is a problem. 2- When we go and click on the beam, we can see color change where it is supported. 3- From the reinforced concrete beam, we can examine the support situation by checking the drawing from the reinforced concrete configuration . Take it easy Unver ÖZCAN
Levent Özpak
Active Member
The tiles are deleted one by one to check that the tile analysis is done correctly after deleting which tile In the program, the analysis of the slabs at the same level on the floor is done in one go. If the slabs are solved piece by piece, it can be considered that there is a problem in the slab analysis. Moreover, when the slab results are examined in the 3d frame, it can be checked whether the finite elements of the slab at the same level and with no spaces between are formed as a single piece."sereze":dgdvk6x0" said:
Geometry control can be done. In the Beam Information and Static Results report, it can be checked to which objects the beam is attached. The 3d frame model of the structure can be checked in the perspective window. Beam-column, panel-column, panel -Nodal point appears at intersections like beams etc. Rigid arms are in the form of a green line.
Hello there. My question is about matte raft foundations. According to the theory of creases resting on elastic ground in mat foundations, just like in shoes, Vcr> Vd. Is the cutting force controlled? Or is it calculated only according to the moment? For example, is the shear force control carried out in a section where one arm rests on a mat foundation?
Levent Özpak
Active Member
Me
Hello, punching control is performed on mat foundations, not cutting control. Results are titled in the Raft Foundation Report "Rate Foundation Punching Control" printed below."nitasltd":167jrdcu" said:
While examining the shear analysis results under the reinforced concrete tab in one of my projects, I saw that the worst combination was 0.9 G + Ex1. M3 calculated according to 75,154 tm result for major moment, when I checked, yes it was the biggest moment result. I did not understand why the result of 2.54 in the same combination for M2 and 93 tons for the axial force was used in the same combination, but the result of 239 tons at 1.4 G + 1.6 Q for the axial force was not used, because I did not understand why the most unfavorable moment was not used in the M2 moment. Or am I wrong.
Columns and walls are designed not according to the greatest moment and normal forces separately, but according to the effects of the combination that will produce the largest reinforcement area. This is not often the combination with the greatest axial force. Remember the column bearing curve, even as the normal force increases in the lower sections, the capacity of the member increases (reinforcement requirement decreases). In members under axial compression and bending, the moment is often the determining factor.
It's good to think about the physical meaning of the loading combination. Each combination indicates the effects that may be present in the structure at a given moment. As a general rule, an effect in combination X does not act at the same time as an effect in combination Y. (Except for exceptions and regulations). For example, 1.4G+1.6Q is the situation where the building is affected by vertical effects in a stationary state in the long term (in the absence of an earthquake). Safety coefficients are used because additions can be made to the building in the long run, the live load can be very variable and the building will be in this state for the longest time. 0.9G+E is roughly the case of an earthquake while the building is under construction. In general, the most unfavorable situation in vertical load-bearing elements arises from this combination because the normal force is low and the moments are high. G+Q+E is the case of an earthquake while the building is in use. Therefore, at a given moment, only one of these states will be present in the structure and the elements will only receive influences under that combination. In other words, since the moment M2 in one load and the moment M3 in the other load or the normal force in another load will not act on the elements at the same time, the design is made on the basis of the reinforcement areas calculated from the internal forces of each combination, and the combination that requires the most reinforcement area is selected as the design combination. The axial force has an indirect effect on the design by changing the moment carrying capacity of the element (thereby changing the reinforcement requirement). As a direct axial force design, only the upper limits set by the regulation are checked whether it exceeds.
Actually, the comment was not very accurate 
, 0.9G+E represents the situation where the most unfavorable effects can occur for vertical load-bearing elements in the building, as I wrote above, because the normal force is low and the moment is high. This can happen during construction as well as during the lifetime of the building (eg when the building is empty), and is again considered to be a safety factor at a certain level (the normal forces are further reduced with a coefficient of 0.9). Returning to the topic, the main idea of the message is that the M2, M3 and N influences of the different combinations do not interact with each other. Good work.
, 0.9G+E represents the situation where the most unfavorable effects can occur for vertical load-bearing elements in the building, as I wrote above, because the normal force is low and the moment is high. This can happen during construction as well as during the lifetime of the building (eg when the building is empty), and is again considered to be a safety factor at a certain level (the normal forces are further reduced with a coefficient of 0.9). Returning to the topic, the main idea of the message is that the M2, M3 and N influences of the different combinations do not interact with each other. Good work.umutozalit
New Member
1) Especially in continuous foundations that are angled in the idea (eg with an auxiliary command), ensuring that the continuous foundations we have marked are seen and drawn as the continuation of them (for continuous foundations with a low angle, the reinforcement is extended 5 meters from the top and bottom or cut from a certain distance.) 2) The continuous foundation we used before. Re-creation of the freaks command.....
Levent Özpak
Active Member
Hello, in the Reinforced Concrete/Parameters/General Reinforced Concrete Parameters dialog, angled foundations can be drawn continuously by entering the angle value (maximum 30 degrees) in the "Continuously accept beams with small angle difference" line."umutozalit":2m9n2l9y" said:
This request you mentioned earlier is among our notes. We wish you good work.
umutozalit
New Member
As done in beams; Is it possible to write your jeans in the basic details?
mhanifiata
New Member
In the latest versions, there have been great beauties in beam drawings. We think it will..."umutozalit":3r2bvjrf" said: