Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

Table of slab and beam loads Greetings, I will make a request on the formwork plans drawing. The drawing is sometimes confused when using the command to show tile loads. Building inspections and related administrations also want to control floor loads more easily. Is it possible to put a table option for this, such as a counter deflection table, showing the floor and beam loads? Take it easy, good work.
 
I am getting an insufficient reinforcement error on some console slabs in a project. It gives insufficient reinforcement error even though the required pursantan is provided. There is no problem in geometry control. I would be glad if you help.
 
"proisa":3lluzlmx" said:
I am getting insufficient reinforcement error in some console slabs in one of my projects. It gives insufficient reinforcement error even though the required pursanta is provided. There is no problem in geometry control. I would be glad if you could help.
Click to expand...
we work...
 
Hello, in the attached file I named "LOAD PROBLEM", my 7 t and 0.25 ton loads corresponding to 3.01 m are not visible in the 3D frame window. I need to define these loadings at the intersections of the beams. When I select the beam and open the change loads window, there appears to be a load. As far as I understand, the beam length does not include the green parts of the beam junctions. My uploads are concentrated loads from the steel superstructure and I have no way of getting the impact note back and forth. Are loads included even though they are not visible on the 3D frame screen? I also have a question about column loads in the attached picture. The relevant file is attached.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Hello, -User defined loads are always visible in the Perspective window. Not being visible may be due to the load not being placed on the beam. - Since the point loads defined on the column act on the center of gravity of the column, the moments resulting from these loads are not taken into account. -You can create a separate point load for all loads and moments acting on the column by clicking the add point load command. Your project file cannot be downloaded. (Site gives banned warning)
 
Mr. Levent, I renewed the link and it is attached. Attachment:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
I had one more question. According to the article below, due to the loads I applied on the beam in the attached project, I need to increase the internal force values of the beam by 50%. I don't know how to do this. DBYBHY 2007 article: 2.3.2.4 (b) In case the column rests on a beam supported at both ends, in all sections of the beam and also in all sections of the other beams and columns that join to the nodal points where this beam is connected in the direction of the earthquake, all interior loads formed by the combined effect of the earthquake and vertical loads. force values will be increased by 50%. Thanks
 
The program takes the beam length as the clear span and does not show the load at that point, as it does not take the beam length up to the center of the point where the two beams meet. So how can a load acting on this point be defined? Can't we add a module where we can draw straight lines, etc., on the screen where I write this article, on the send answer screen in the forum? In some cases, it would be possible to express what we wanted by drawing simple shapes. :D
 
"windtalker":13fk2acu" said:
Can't we add a module where we can draw straight lines etc. on the forum posting screen, that is, on the screen where I'm writing this article? You can use the website ://sketchtoy.com[/url] You can draw a figure, save it and share the link.
Click to expand...
 
"windtalker":uq1pejx7" said:
The program takes the beam length as the clean span and does not show the load at this point because it does not take the beam length to the center of the point where the two beams meet. So how can a load acting on this point be defined.
Click to expand...
Add Node load Load can be defined with command. Select Show Node Points in the Options Section of the Structure Tree. Select the Node Point in the perspective window and press the right button. Click the Add Node Load command in the dialog that opens.
According to the following item, due to the loads I applied on the beam in the attached project, the beam internal force I need to increase the values by 50%. I don't know how to do this. I don't know how to do this. I don't know how to do it.
Click to expand...
 
Hello, For the above project, I have defined 1 cm high columns to the places where I will affect the loads coming from the steel feet in the superstructure and I have applied the loads from the superstructure to the 0 elevation of the column. I did this both to create B3 irregularity and to make the program detect it, and to affect the load exactly where I want it. In the shear diagrams on the beams, I do not see any discontinuity in the notes on which the columns act. I guess the loads I apply to the columns do not affect the basement. The file is attached. Thanks in advance for your help. APPENDIX:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"windtalker":36pr05iw" said:
Hi, For the above project, I defined columns with a height of 1 cm where I will affect the loads coming from the steel feet on the superstructure and applied the loads from the superstructure to the 0 elevation of the column. This is both creating B3 irregularity and allowing the program to detect it. I did it to apply the load exactly to the points I wanted. I can't see any discontinuity in the shear diagrams of the beams, in the notes that the columns affect. I guess the loads I applied to the columns do not affect the basement. The file is attached. Thanks in advance for your help.
Click to expand...
Hello, The columns are not defined to create B3 irregularities on the beams. The beam on which the column sits is entered in two parts. The coordinate of the joint point where these two parts are connected must be the same as the coordinate of the joint point of the column resting on the beam. The column is defined in its own coordinates on the upper floors of the beam on which the column sits. number It should be seen that they are numbered sequentially. In addition, in the Earthquake Regulation report, information about the application of B3 Irregularity appears under the heading B3 Irregularity control, in the Column and Beam Information and Static Results report. Good work
 
I think there is a problem with the beam drawings. I can't solve it, I would be glad if you help me. especially beams 13 and 14 on 2 axles...
 
"ALKN":1cpq91eu" said:
I think there is a problem with the beam drawings. I can't solve it. I would appreciate it if you could help me. Especially the 13 and 14 beams on the 2 axis...
Click to expand...
Hello, K13-K14 beams are not straight beams, they are single beams with curved beam command. define it as a beam. In beam settings, give the number of curved beam points 1. Good work
 
good day, I've searched the forum but haven't found a satisfactory answer. I wonder if the mold plans, reinforcement expansions, etc. that we created in ideCAD Static. Do we have a chance to import drawings like DWG files at once, or do we have to export them separately for each sheet? Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK
 
"yagmurcankocak":a5147hbo" said:
good day, I searched the forum but couldn't find a satisfactory answer. I wonder if we can import the drawings we created in ideCAD Statik, such as mold plans, reinforcement openings, etc. into a DWG file at once, or for each sheet Do we need to export separately?Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK
Click to expand...
You can transfer dwg at once after collecting all the drawings in one sheet by using the layout design possibilities.Video about Drawings and Sheet Design:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Hello dear idecad users, I just joined you. I'm still a fresh engineer. I just started learning idecad program. Since I do not have much experience in practice, I would like to get your valuable opinions. How can I continue with the system you have seen in the add-on, where are the beams needed, are there any places where there should be studs or something, how will the balcony flooring be, how would you continue it, please help me, thank you in advance..
 
Good afternoon, To the clear statement "The smallest dimension of rectangular columns shall not be less than 250 mm and their cross-sectional area shall not be less than 75000 mm². The diameter of circular columns shall be at least 300 mm" for the cross-sections of the columns in the column cross-section area control (TDY 3.3.1.1). However, when I define a circular column with a diameter of 300 mm in the program, I get a "column with low section" warning. I think cross-sectional area control is applied in circular columns as well. I wanted to share. Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK
 
"yagmurcankocak":3rfmhgk2" said:
Good afternoon, For the cross-section of columns in the column cross-section control (TDY 3.3.1.1), "The smallest dimension of rectangular columns shall not be less than 250 mm and cross-sectional area not less than 75000 mm². Despite the clear statement that "the diameter of circular columns will be at least 300 mm", when I define a circular column with a diameter of 300 mm in the program, I get a "column with low cross section" warning. I think cross-sectional area control is applied in circular columns as well. I wanted to share. Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK
Click to expand...
]
"siromar":3rfmhgk2" said:
I noticed something wrong in the column cutting safety section of the report, take it easy, good work
Click to expand...
Thank you, good work
 
Good evening, Regarding the analysis of existing buildings; Different diameters of reinforcement can be used in some beams (or columns). For example, for a beam, 2Ø12 + 2Ø16 flat reinforcement is used at the top. But I couldn't define it in the program. I wonder if I couldn't see it or do we not have the opportunity to make such a definition yet? Because otherwise, we have to choose a reinforcement that is below the existing reinforcement area, such as 2Ø14. And it is not easy to find reinforcements that will give such close values every time. Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top