Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

"yagmurcankocak":2ndhpux8" said:
Good evening, Regarding the analysis of existing buildings, some beams (or columns) can use different diameters of reinforcement. For example, 2Ø12 + 2Ø16 flat reinforcement was used on top for a beam. But I could not define it in the program. I wonder if I Did I not see it or do we not have the opportunity to define it in this way yet? Because otherwise we have to choose a reinforcement that is below the existing reinforcement area, such as 2Ø14. And it is not easy to find reinforcements that will give similar values every time. Good work, Yağmur Can KOÇAK[/ quote] Hello, It is possible to enter different rebar diameters as major and minor in columns. However, it is important to be able to provide total rebar area for both longitudinal and transverse reinforcement. In short, a data entry depending on the diameter of the reinforcement is not required. Columns, beam supports and You can arrange the reinforcement in any diameter to provide the total reinforcement on the panels.In addition, there is stirrup tightening in the existing beams and columns o It is also important to inform you whether it is loupe or not... The relevant option is available in the beam, column object settings. Good work...
Click to expand...
 
Good evening. The wall passes over the floor. In this case, how much should I take the slab live load? Or how much G should I take when I define the slab linear load? Thank you
 
"yusuf_engineer":q7dbpvg6" said:
good evening.the wall is passing over the slab. in this case, how much should I take the slab live load? or how much G should I get when I define the slab linear load? thanks
Click to expand...
LinearFloorLoad_G = WallVolumeWeight * WallThickness *MasonryHeight + * Total PlasterThickness * Plaster Height Define the linear slab load length as the wall length. I assumed only plaster on the wall. If there are other layers, their load should be added to the total with the same logic. Also, if there are window gaps, the gap should be subtracted from the total. Good work
 
the project is currently solving in normal times. I left the analysis open and left the workplace. When I came back, I saw that it was solved in 86 minutes, I received SS, there was no such problem in the next analyzes, good work
 
I wish you a good week everyone, The subject I want to ask is about personnel naming. In my model related to a retrofit project, I give my columns numbers such as S101, S102....S205 in accordance with the original project. But when I get the floor plan (or in the reports), the program automatically prints the basement columns as SK101 (or SZ201 or S1301). Is there an option to cancel this or to print only the column numbers I entered? Thank you now, Yağmur Can KOÇAK
 
"yagmurcankocak":1ttqjjor" said:
I wish you a good week everyone, The subject I want to ask is about staff naming. In my model, which is related to a retrofitting project, I give my columns numbers like S101, S102....S205 in accordance with the original project. When I receive the plan (or in the reports), the program automatically prints the basement columns as SK101 (or SZ201 or S1301).Is there an option to cancel this or to print only the column numbers I entered?Thank you, Yağmur Can KOÇAK
Click to expand...
] Hello, if you delete the indices written in the Index column in the Analysis/Floor parameters dialog, you will get the results you want. Good work.
 
"HakanŞahin":1icgc5zi" said:
"yusuf_engineer":1icgc5zi" said:
good evening.the wall passes over the floor.In this case, how much should I get the slab live load?or how much G should I get when I define the slab linear load?thanks[/quote ] LinearSlabLoad_W = WallVolumeWeight * WallThickness * WallHeight + PlasterVolumeWeight * TotalPlasterThickness * PlasterHeight Define the linear slab load length as the wall length. I assumed it was just plaster on the wall. If there are other layers, their load should be added to the total with the same logic. In addition, if there are window gaps, the gap should be subtracted from the total. Good work
Click to expand...
Hello, I think that the software I have prepared for myself on the subject can help you. I prepared the program to facilitate data entry with ideStatik. Best regards. Erbil ÖZÜM Note: I could not complete the software due to my busy schedule.
Click to expand...
 
Hakan, I had a question. While solving a system with different floor slabs in the İdecad static program, does it make any difference whether we take any of the floor elevations in the floor general settings? For example, it is a single storey building but +2, 80 m; + 3.00 m ; Let there be slabs at + 3.50 m and + 4.20 m elevations. Does it matter in terms of Static calculation if we write the elevation of +2,80 or +4,20 m of the elevation we will take here in the floor general setting? Whichever we take, we will make more logical solution. good work...
 
"saridurmus":2nbsyuk6" said:
Hakan, I had a question. When solving a system with different floor slabs in the İdecad static program, does it make any difference if we take any of the floor elevations in the floor general settings? For example, it is a single storey building but +2, 80 Let there be slabs at m; + 3.00 m; + 3.50 m and + 4.20 m elevation. Is it important for static calculations that we write the elevation of +2,80 or +4,20 m of the elevation we will take here in the floor general setting? Whichever we choose, we will make a more logical solution. Good work...
Click to expand...
Hello Mr. İbrahim, It does not matter in terms of static. You can base any jeans. Good work
 
Mr. Hakan, that's what I say, but I am the director of the Youth and Sports Provincial Directorate. In the project I did, I bought the middle quota, but it was insisted that I do it according to the highest quota. I fixed it, but I asked if there was something I didn't know about. thanks.
 
"saridurmus":dl1d7qtg" said:
Hakan, that's what I say too, but in the project I did as the director of the Youth and Sports Provincial Directorate, I bought a middle dent, but it was insisted that I do it according to the highest quota. I fixed it, but I asked if there was something I didn't know about. Thanks .
Click to expand...
The important thing is that the element sizes are taken correctly (as they should be) on an element basis... In this sense, there will be no difference between the two projects.You can compare if you already have both projects.
 
Hello, In the wide opening on the front of the attached villa project, vertical displacement values of 8 mm on the ground floor and 10 mm on the first floor are seen. I couldn't decide whether these values are appropriate or not. Thanks in advance for your help and system-based suggestions. The file is attached:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"windtalker":16mpbkka" said:
Hello, In the wide opening on the front of the attached villa project, vertical displacement values of 8 mm on the ground floor and 10 mm on the 1st floor are seen. I could not decide whether these values are appropriate. The file is attached:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
I solved it by transferring the system to Sap2000. The displacement values of an example joint point (979) calculated in sap2000 and ideCAD Static are attached Note: The deformity image in the picture is 273 times more. DN=979 ideCAD Lz=9.68 mm Sap2000 U3=9.73 mm Also, there is no deformation problem in your project... Good work
 
Take a look at the attached picture. The thickness of the entered staircase is 17 cm. Although the program takes the value as the thickness given in the landing parts, in the inclined regions (in the area where the steps are) it is not 17 cm in the direction perpendicular to the slope where the steps are placed, but (not the entered value) it still takes the thickness in the vertical direction on the floor or landing plane. In other words, since the slope is 32 degrees in this drawing: cos32 x 17 cm =14.4 cm step part slab thickness. However, my expectation is that the floor thickness is homogeneous at every point. am i wrong? Good luck with...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top