"windtalker":3peg2j9y" said:Hello There is also a shutdown problem in the following section. When the mode number is set to 50, the porogram is closed during the analysis. There is an incorrect combination that I cannot catch. Is there an easy way to see these errors? Thank youYou do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
The analysis is completed smoothly in the project you added. How much ram is your computer? (According to the semi-rigid diaphragm option, there must be at least 8 GB of RAM in the analysis. Recommended 16 GB) Otherwise, contact the voice. Let's try to identify the problem by connecting to your computer remotely."Levent Özpak":3peg2j9y" said:....Also, even if the mod number is 60, the analysis is completed.( Your computer's ram may be insufficient.)
Your project can also be analyzed on a 64-bit operating system with 4 GB of ram. If you contact us, you can access your computer remotely. Maybe we can identify the problem."windtalker":c1ghmod4" said:Ram 6 gb in this case I think I will have to analyze with full rigid diaphragm.
Hello, *Since the analysis method was chosen as a fully rigid diaphragm, the stair abutments were subjected to structure-independent solution conditions. (Stairway loads can be entered as additional loads to the relevant elements.) *Select Earthquake load determination method -Mode combining method- in Analysis Settings. Good work"windtalker":35g87qk5" said:Hello Even though I have increased the number of modes to 300 in the attached file, I still get the warning that the number of modes is insufficient in dynamic analysis. There was no such problem before adding the stairs. I guess this is because it found more than one rigid diaphragm. What is the solution? Thank youYou do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
"aykut_k":31eshb4p" said:Hi; Although the reinforcements of the continuous foundation and tie beams in my project are larger than 12m, they are not divided. How can I ensure that it is divided by 12m? I am sending the project in the attachment. an 12 meter reinforcement length control is not done automatically.
* Arrange the stair supports according to the support conditions independent of the structure Select the earthquake load determination method -Mode combination method- in Analysis Settings *Rat slab thickness control It is done by looking at the distance between the two columns in the two systems. Since there is no column in the RD18 raft, the raft opening is taken into account in the thickness control. Enter the value you see appropriate in the Reinforced Concrete Calculation Axle Edit command line -clear clearance for thickness control- line."windtalker":s1g13esn" said:Hello In the attached project, I get the error that the number of modes is insufficient and the thickness of the mat is insufficient. I increased the thickness of the raft quite a bit (90 cm), but it does not provide. What is the reason? Thanks.You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Mr. Levent, thank you for your answer. I interpreted the situation as you described. However, I wanted to confirm that the reinforcement line may have slipped. Of course, I think there is no technical equivalent to saying Q../30 when describing the tooth-longitudinal reinforcement in the drawing. because there is no distance to apply /30 (the thread sizes in my example are 30*50) I think it would be more accurate to show the number of reinforcements and their locations instead, thanks again."Levent Özpak":g3y2nymk" said:Hi, The reinforcement shown as fi14/30 in the drawing you attached refers to the longitudinal horizontal reinforcements on the base tooth, not the stirrup. I think there was a misunderstanding since the reinforcement line is a little lower and the longitudinal reinforcements are not evenly spaced. Good work
"windtalker":29wz4utc" said:Hi, I am getting an error about increasing the system rigidity on the 2nd floor. What can I do. ThanksYou do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Hello, If I understood your question correctly; Layers/Drawing while on the data entry screen If you turn off the name and dimensioning options for column, curtain and beam in the Details dialog, the element name and size texts will not appear on the formwork plan after you get the formwork plan."aykut_k":33ef2jbk" said:Is there a practical way to select and/or delete only the names and dimensions of column, beam, curtain elements in formwork plans?
"aykut_k":1b3i6kj4" said:Thanks, but that's not what I said.
For example, to delete the names and dimensions of all beams in the drawn formwork plan, You can try the method Layer settings / turn off all / only beam layer / enter text command / select all / delete, then layer settings / turn all on[ /u] You can use the same thing for walls, columns or other elements.This is the method I sometimes use.But sometimes when entering data in drawings, there is a problem if the beam element is not in the beam layer (or the column element is in the column layer)."aykut_k":3d775r4v" said:Is there a practical way to select and/or delete only the names and dimensions of column, beam, curtain elements in formwork plans?
German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish