Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

Mr. Hakan, it is not a problem in the case of Parapet, I shared it with you because I do not want this lack of drawing to remain in the program when reverse beams are made on the top floors, that is, when the column does not continue.
 
"sates":cmtnw06f" said:
Hakan, I shared this with you because I don't want this drawing deficiency to remain in the program when the reverse beam is made on the top floors, that is, when the column does not continue, in case of parapet it is not a problem.
Hello, In the program, as data input beams are given positive elevation, then the columns to which these beams are connected must be given an upper level. In this case, there is no problem with the drawing. In your definition, this drawing problem occurs because the columns are not given an upper level. Good work
 
hello, if we can see the axles in the cassette break openings, I think we will be able to give more painful drawings ... take it easy
 
LEVENT MAY ALSO DEFINE INCLINED FLOOR, WHEN WE ENTER BEAM AND COLUMNS BY RAISING, THE AUTOMATIC FLOOR IS CREATED WHILE THE FLOOR SHOULD BE PARALLEL TO THE INCLINED BEAM IT IS NOT INCREDIBLE WHY? TSK.
 
"MEHMETSIRAY":9cb8pky7" said:
LEVENT MAY ALSO DEFINE INCLINED FLOOR, WHEN WE ENTER BEAM AND COLUMNS BY LEVELS, AUTOMATIC FLOORING IS CREATED WHEN WE CREATE A FLOORING TOOL, [INCREDITED FLOORING TOOL] [INCREDITED FLOORING TOOL] QUARELEK quote NEKOREKUE FLOORING? Do you also have problems when you create the bevel tile with the objects[/u] command?
 
English version 7 demo version is out I wonder if you said next week on July 12 can I get some information I wonder if there is a short problem in the bidet concrete uses m3 iron kg units in the quantity I am not sure about dime help or because there are only numbers in the quantity good days may come easy
 
"mc_signal":3s1lkf4l" said:
I wonder if the English version 7 demo version is out, I wonder if you said next week on July 12, can I get some information?
I wrote a reply to your message last week but it was not noticed... Nedim Bey gave the demo links, but I asked again Let me give you...
"HakanŞahin":3s1lkf4l" said:
"mc_signal":3s1lkf4l" said:
7 Is there a download link for the .17 or 7.14 English demo version, I wonder if an English civil engineer friend of mine will have it installed for review.
Good work
 
By intervening the hairpin reinforcements on the balcony console floors according to the calculation axes, I make the 8-gauge reinforcements, but I see that the reinforcements of some of the symmetrical balconies on the floor did not change in the drawing even though I intervened. I wonder what could be the reason for this? According to which point of view is the right-left direction on the account axes evaluated?
 
Hello everyone..As a civil engineering student, I was curious about idecad..I had a question..Although it was immediately used for the structure after entering the data and making the analysis, M, As, Br (pursantange, reinforcement, torsion. .) errors appeared.. To solve the stripping issue, I will either increase the cross section or decrease the amount of reinforcement.. But the program throws out an unbalanced amount of reinforcement that the cross-section cannot take.. When the reinforcement is played, the reinforcement warning comes. If you increase the cross-section, it is not aesthetic. In addition, in this reinforced concrete/beam menu, there are colors such as red, purple, dark purple in unfavorable situations. What does this mean? Best regards..
 
"akeldan":1kz60hva" said:
by interfering with the hairpin reinforcements on the balcony console floors according to the calculation axes, I make the 8-gauge reinforcements, but I see that the reinforcements of some of the symmetrical balconies on the floor did not change in the drawing even though I intervened.
Hello, could you add your related project to your message by writing a step-by-step explanation such as "I am changing the following on this floor, on those floors"?
 
"illaga":wc17vpc6" said:
hi everyone..As a civil engineering student, I was curious about idecad..I had a question..After entering the data and making the analysis, even though it was immediately used for the structure, M in Reinforced Concrete/Beam control, Errors such as As, Br (pursantaj, reinforcement, torsion..) appeared. In order to solve the pursantaj issue, I will either increase the cross section or decrease the amount of reinforcement. no aesthetics.. I'm waiting for your opinions on this subject..Also, there are colors such as red, purple, dark purple in this reinforced concrete/beam menu in unfavorable situations. Best regards..
If you add your project, we can check it for the accuracy of data entry. We can give accurate answers.
 
Dear programmers; Do you plan to write an application where we can see and review our projects on iPhone? (Someone did it for their own program :D )
 
We think that such an application is not an important need "for now" and is not practical.
 
If you save your project as a PDF, you can view and check your floor plans, expansions etc in Iphone and Ipad. This feature is available in ideCAD since version 6
 
Hello there; Projects can be viewed on iPhone and iPad with AutocadWS without the need for PDF. In addition, with the TeamViewer application that you can install on iPhone or iPad, it is possible to access your computer in the office and study or review. But a MAC compatible ide version would be nice. After the 64 bit attack, we are waiting for the MAC compatible version from ideYapı. Best regards.
 
Hello, Does İdecad calculate the punching effect of reinforced concrete curtains on beamless raft foundations? If so, in which report do we see this?
 
Hello there; I'm not sure if this is the place on the forum but I thought I'd post it anyway. How is your work on 3D analysis of steel structures? Steel software that can be used with the existing IdeStatik interface would be great.
 
In the attached project, I entered the bed coefficient as 10,000, but it did not save many foundations. but when I reduce the bed coefficient, for example, to 4000-5000, then all the foundations save. so what is the reason for this? Why don't the foundations save when you increase the bed coefficient? In this case, is there a solution other than increasing the basic dimensions? I would also like to ask if you can explain the soil safety control options of the foundations (according to earthquake, average stress, etc.) in the analysis options I would like to ask, in which situations and where they are used. Also, one last thing (I know it's happened a lot :) ) It would be great if a general check of my project was done. thank you
 
Back
Top