Opinions questions about the use of Reinforced Concrete Design

Re: Opinions about the use of ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions
"EmreT":1ehy9vl2" said:
Hi. We can divide the raft foundations of different thicknesses from the models by the slab edge and give both foundation thicknesses separately. As can be seen, the bottom reinforcement coming from the 80cm thick foundation is seen to penetrate into the 40cm foundation. Is this a problem because we divide the foundation with the slab edge? The relevant model is attached.
Hello, In the raft slab, the neighboring reinforcement relations are adjusted according to the upper level of the raft. As a solution to you I can suggest this: Before getting the basic application plan, give 0.01 cm level to the raft slab on the right.
 
Re: Opinions about using ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions
"HakanŞahin":33j80s2g" said:
"EmreT":33j80s2g" said:
Hello. We can divide the raft foundations of different thicknesses from the models by the slab edge and give both foundation thicknesses separately. Only when taking the drawing, it is seen that the bottom reinforcement coming from the 80cm thick foundation penetrates into the 40cm foundation as seen in the picture. Is this a problem because we divide the foundation by the slab edge? The relevant model is attached.
Hello, in raft flooring, neighboring reinforcement relations are adjusted according to the upper level of the raft. As a solution, I can suggest the following. Before getting the basic application plan, level the raft slab on the right by 0.01 cm.
If the option to draw the reinforcement calculation axes without stopping at the slab edge while making the basic models, this problem will be eliminated. Drawing a project is not an easy task, but one expects relatively simple skills from the software that does so much :)
 
Re: Opinions about using ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions In my project with 8.504, I couldn't see any problem with the floor mesh, only the pink lines of the columns are getting longer in some places, does it show any problem as seen in the picture or is it correct in terms of shape? I can add data if needed.
 
Re: Opinions about using ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions
"celikus":q3dq6y45" said:
In my project with 8.504, I couldn't see any problem with floor meshes, only the pink lines of the columns are getting longer in some places, does it show any problem as seen in the picture? Is it correct in terms of shape?I can add the data if necessary.
Hello, Those lines are rigid arms from vertical carriers to finite elements and beams.
 
Re: Opinions about using ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions
"HakanŞahin":622pv3lt" said:
"celikus":622pv3lt" said:
8.504 I couldn't see any problem in the floor mesh, only the pink lines of the columns are in some places does it get longer, does it show any problem as seen in the picture or is it correct in terms of shape? If necessary, I can add the data.
Hello, Those lines are finite elements from vertical carriers and rigid arms connected to beams. There does not appear to be any problem in the flooring webs.
Thank you, Mr. Hakan.
 
Re: Opinions about the use of ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions Hello, The number of crossties on the curtain body is automatically drawn as 10 /m2 in case of critical curtains, and as 4 pieces /m2 in the absence of it, as in the regulation. In my project, when I want to make the critical curtain height higher than the calculated one on some curtains, I have to manually correct the drawing and the quantity since I cannot interfere with the number of cross-ties. Is there any other solution?
 
Re: Opinions about the use of ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions
"MaFiAMaX":3nafvv86" said:
Hello, The number of crossties on the curtain body is 10 /m2 in case of critical curtains, as in the regulation, and 4 /m2 in case of absence. It is drawn automatically. In my project, when I want to make the critical curtain height higher than the calculated one on some curtains, I have to manually correct the drawing and the quantity since I cannot interfere with the number of cross-ties. Is there any other solution?
Hello Mr. Erhan, I want to set the critical curtain height on the curtains in accordance with the TDY conditions. We cannot change it in the program.Since the crossties are automatically determined according to the critical curtain height, we do not have the opportunity to intervene as you said.
 
Re: Opinions about the use of ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions Hello, When I have the column application plan of the ground floor with soil curtains drawn, the reinforcement of the curtains is not drawn because the ground floor is selected as rigid in the general settings of the floor. If I remove the rigid sign it is drawn. Does the relevant floor need to be non-rigid to get a drawing? In addition, when there are small angles between the soil curtains in the basement floors, as in the picture, the horizontal reinforcements go up to the end of the curtain and are squared. Can we change this situation? Vertical reinforcement is not drawn at the junction of the curtains.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: Opinions about the use of ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions
"EmreT":1ql2k9ff" said:
Hi, When I have the column application plan of the ground floor with soil curtains drawn, the reinforcement of the curtains is not drawn because the ground floor is rigid in the general settings of the floor. If I remove the rigid sign, it is drawn. Does the relevant floor need to be non-rigid to get a drawing?
Hello, Yes, it is related to the definition of rigid floor. Since the panels are on one floor, if rigid basement is defined, no expansion is given because the basement curtain and body reinforcements are fixed. If the curtain is not in a rigid basement, the opening is given.
"EmreT":1ql2k9ff" said:
In addition, when there are small angles between the soil curtains in the basement floors, as in the picture, the horizontal reinforcements go to the end of the curtain and are squared. Can we change this situation?
We can't change it.
"EmreT":1ql2k9ff" said:
Vertical reinforcement is not drawn at the junction of the curtains.
hw/lw condition is checked. Since the title condition is not met, the curtains are drawn without a title. If you want to make a headboard, you can define it in curtain settings.
 
Re: Opinions about using ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions Hello, Sometimes there is a slab edge that we decide to make a beam later on. I do not want to delete the edge of the tile so that the tile is not deleted. Is joist identification on the slab edge a problem?
 
Re: Opinions about using ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions
"MaFiAMaX":1k1prot2" said:
Hi, Sometimes there is a slab edge that we decide to make a beam later. would it be a problem to define the beam on it?
Hello, In this case, the slab will not transfer the load to the beam that will be attached to the slab edge. After deleting the slab edge and defining the beam, you need to create the slab again. Good work
 
Re: Opinions about using ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions Did you want a command like [/u][/b] to convert slab edge to beam? ;)
 
Re: Opinions about the use of ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions Hello, in the basic interactive analysis of my B+Z+5 storey building example; Relative storey drift and storey displacements remain within the limits. The period of the building is 1.15, and on the last floor, the modal analysis displacement is 14 cm in the x direction. I wonder what kind of way I should follow about whether the modal analysis is within the final floor displacement limits.
 
Re: Opinions about the use of ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions
"lookindoors":r327d0ox" said:
Hi, In the basic interactive analysis of my B+Z+5 storey building example; Relative storey drift and storey displacements remain within limits. The period of the building is 1.15, and on the last floor, the modal analysis displacement is 14 cm in the x direction. I wonder how I should follow whether the modal analysis is within the last floor displacement limits.
ideCAD officials will give the most correct answer, but if we do not count the basement, it is 6 For a one-storey building, the period of 1.15 seconds seems a bit too much. Also, there seems to be a problem with the 14 cm displacement in the model analysis.
 
Re: Opinions about the use of ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions The displacement values calculated for each mode in dynamic analysis are pseudo displacements. Their values mean nothing. If you add the project, friends will take a look.
 
Re: Opinions about using ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions
"MaFiAMaX":3s79n399" said:
"lookindoors":3s79n399" said:
Hi, in basic interactive analysis in my B+Z+5 storey building example; Relative story translations and storey displacements remain within the limits. The period of the building is 1.15, and on the last floor, the modal analysis displacement is 14 cm in the x direction. I wonder how I should follow the modal analysis whether it is within the displacement limits of the last floor.
ideCAD officials will give the most correct answer, but if we do not count the basement, the 1.15 sec period seems a bit too much for a 6-storey building. Also, there seems to be a problem with the 14 cm displacement in the model analysis. Since the period is too high, I wonder if you did the slab loading too much?
"Ismail Hakki Besler":3s79n399" said:
The displacement values calculated for each mode in dynamic analysis are pseudo displacements. Their values are meaningless. If you add the project, friends They'll look.
I'm attaching the project
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: Opinions about the use of ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions Hello, When we manually enter the slab additional reinforcements and have them analyzed and corrected, the reinforcement we entered does not save. Isn't there a locking option like other accessories?
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: opinions on using ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions
"lookindoors":ugjic7ra" said:
"MaFiAMaX":ugjic7ra" said:
"lookindoors":ugjic7ra" said:
Hi, B+ In the basic interactive analysis in my Z+5 storey building example, the relative storey drift and storey displacements remain within the limits.The period of the building is 1.15, and on the last floor, the modal analysis displacement is 14 cm in the x direction.I wonder if the modal analysis is within the last floor displacement limits or not. How should I proceed.
ideCAD officials will give the most correct answer, but if we do not count the basement, the 1.15 sec period seems a bit too much for a 6-storey building. Also, there seems to be a problem with the 14 cm displacement in the model analysis. did you overdo it?
"Ismail Hakki Besler":ugjic7ra" said:
The displacement values calculated for each mode in dynamic analysis are pseudo displacements. Their values mean nothing. If you add the project, friends will take a look.
I am adding the project.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Hello, Analysis in project There does not appear to be a problem with the model. The displacement values appear to be normal, and the relative displacement values are within the limits of the regulation. The high building period is due to the basic interactive solution. In the non-interactive solution, the period is 0.75 sec. comes out around. Good work
 
Re: Opinions about using ideCAD Reinforced Concrete 8 questions
"EmreT":lnodu75w" said:
Hi, When we correct and analyze the slab additional reinforcements manually, it does not save the reinforcement we entered. url=http://hizliresim.com/MkGJo7]
MkGJo7.png
[/url]
Hello Emre, Ability to lock additional accessories in raft flooring However, by selecting larger reinforcement diameters in the Raft reinforcement selection dialog, AS(-) warning can be avoided in the next analysis.
 
Back
Top